Spatial analysis of road traffic crashes and user based assessment of road safety: A case study of Rotterdam

References

• Aarts L, Wijlhuizen GJ, Gebhard S, Goldenbeld C, Decae R, Bos N, Bijleveld F, Mons C, Hoekstra T. 2021. De Staat van de Verkeersveiligheid 2021; Doelstellingen voor 2020 definitief niet gehaald – hoe nu verder? SWOV. The Hague. https://swov.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/rapport/r-2021-21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulhafedh A. 2017. Identifying vehicular crash high risk locations along highways via spatial autocorrelation indices and kernel density estimation. World J Eng Technol. 5(2):198–215. doi:10.4236/wjet.2017.52016.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Wasim S, Irfan S, Gogoi S, Srivastava A, Farheen Z. 2019. Qualitative v/s. quantitative research–a summarized review. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 6(43):2828–2832. doi:10.18410/jebmh/2019/587.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson T. 2007. Comparison of spatial methods for measuring road accident “hotspots”: a case study of London. J Maps. 3(1):55–63. doi:10.1080/jom.2007.9710827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H. 2011. Perception of own death risk: an assessment of road-traffic mortality risk. Risk Anal. 31(7):1069–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01583.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. 2016. Local spatial autocorrelation clusters.
   Google Scholar
• APA Dictionary of Psychology. n.d. Perception [accessed 2021 Dec 6]. https://dictionary.apa.org/perception.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek J, Ciobanu SM, Man TC. 2016. Hotspots and social background of urban traffic crashes: a case study in Cluj-Napoca (Romania). Accid Anal Prev. 87:117–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.026. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíl M, Andrášik R, Sedoník J. 2019. A detailed spatiotemporal analysis of traffic crash hotspots. Appl Geogr. 107(April):82–90. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Black K. 2010. Business statistics for contemporary decision making. 6th ed. Houston (TX): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/business-statistics-for-contemporary-decision-making-by-ken-black_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Blaeij AT, Van Vuuren DJ. 2003. Risk perception of traffic participants. Accid Anal Prev. 35(2):167–175. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00100-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucsuházy K, Matuchová E, Zůvala R, Moravcová P, Kostíková M, Mikulec R. 2020. Human factors contributing to the road traffic accident occurrence. Transp Res Procedia. 45(2019):555–561. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.057.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Arnau C, Prieto Curiel R, Bishop SR. 2020. Uncovering the behaviour of road accidents in urban areas. R Soc Open Sci. 7(4):191739. doi:10.1098/rsos.191739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson J, Jost G, Meinero M. 2022. Ranking EU progress 16th road safety performance index report. Brussels. https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/16-PIN-annual-report_FINAL_WEB_1506_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. 2021. 610 Traffic deaths in 2020. CBS [accessed 2022 Mar 11]. https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2021/15/610-traffic-deaths-in-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary J, Ohri A, Kumar B. 2015. Spatial and statistical analysis of road accidents hot spots using GIS Spatial and statistical analysis of road accidents hot spots using GIS. 3rd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India (3rd CTRG); Kolkata, India.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. 1999. The discovery of grounded theory. 1st ed. New York (NY): Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351522168.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero TE, de Dios Ortuzar J, Raveau S. 2020. Traffic accident risk perception among drivers: a latent variable approach. Transp Plan Technol. 43(3):313–324. doi:10.1080/03081060.2020.1735763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett C, Lambert A, Regan MA. 2012. Text messaging amongst New Zealand drivers: prevalence and risk perception. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 15(3):261–271. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes BD, Haglund K, Beyer KMM, Cassidy LD. 2019. Qualitative methods of road traffic crash research in low- and middle-income countries: a review. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 26(2):194–199. doi:10.1080/17457300.2018.1535512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadaan K, Al-Braizat E, Al-Rafayah S, Gammoh H, Abukahlil Y. 2018. Traffic safety in developed and developing countries: a comparative analysis. J Traffic Logist Eng. 6:1–5. doi:10.18178/jtle.6.1.1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Javadi S-M-H, Tahmasebi S, Azari-Arghun T, Arshi M, Alipour F. 2017. The youth and experience of traffic accidents (grounded theory). Health Emerg Disast Q. 2(2):79–88. doi:10.18869/nrip.hdq.2.2.79.
   Google Scholar
• Kutela B, Langa N, Mwende S, Kidando E, Kitali AE, Bansal P. 2021. A text mining approach to elicit public perception of bike-sharing systems. Travel Behav Soc. 24:113–123. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Martin EA. 2009. A dictionary of law. Oxford University Press [accessed 2021 Jun 8]. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199551248.001.0001/acref-9780199551248.
   Google Scholar
• Lund IO, Rundmo T. 2009. Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes and behaviour. Saf Sci. 47(4):547–553. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Zhang J, Robbins G, Clarke K, Lam M, Pickett W. 1997. Factors affecting the severity of motor vehicle traffic crashes involving young drivers in Ontario. Inj Prev. 3(3):183–189. doi:10.1136/ip.3.3.183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Sozialforschung. 11(3):8. doi:10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
   Google Scholar
• Ngueutsa R, Kouabenan DR. 2017. Accident history, risk perception and traffic safe behaviour. Ergonomics. 60(9):1273–1282. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1259508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe A, Okunuki K-I, Shiode S. 2006. The SANET toolbox: new methods for network spatial analysis. Trans GIS. 10(4):535–550. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01011.x.
   Google Scholar
• Okabe A, Satoh T, Sugihara K. 2009. A kernel density estimation method for networks, its computational method and a GIS-based tool. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 23(1):7–32. doi:10.1080/13658810802475491.
   Google Scholar
• Okabe A, Sugihara K. 2012. Spatial analysis along networks: Statistical and computational methods. Chichester (UK): Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119967101
   Google Scholar
• Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Charutha R, Geetha N. 2011. Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 21:317–325. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.020.
   Google Scholar
• Ram T, Chand K. 2016. Effect of drivers’ risk perception and perception of driving tasks on road safety attitude. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 42:162–176. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat. 2020. Handleiding product Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (BRON). https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/apps/geoservices/geodata/dmc/bron/Documentatie/Handleiding product Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sajed Y, Shafabakhsh G, Bagheri M. 2019. Hotspot location identification using accident data, traffic and geometric characteristics. Eng J. 23(6):191–207. doi:10.4186/ej.2019.23.6.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafabakhsh GA, Famili A, Bahadori MS. 2017. GIS-based spatial analysis of urban traffic accidents: case study in Mashhad, Iran. J Traffic Transp Eng. 4(3):290–299. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2017.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifian S, RK, Mh V, Mohammadi R. 2021. A model to explain road traffic data collection and registry in Iran: a grounded theory. J Inj Violence Res. 13(2):87–98. doi:10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva C, Moeckel R, Clifton K. 2020. Proof of concept for a grounded theory approach to understanding interactions occurring on bicycle facilities. Transp Res Rec. 2674(10):94–104. doi:10.1177/0361198120943588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg L, Moen E, Rundmo T. 2004. Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Trondheim. http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:x8G44WOi3ssJ:www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Psychometric_paradigm.pdf+Explaining+risk+perception.&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk.
   Google Scholar
• Soltani A, Askari S. 2017. Exploring spatial autocorrelation of traffic crashes based on severity. Injury. 48(3):637–647. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth DL, Srikanth I, Arockiasamy DM. 2019. Identification of traffic accident hotspots using geographical information system (GIS). Int J Eng Adv Technol. 9(2):4429–4438. doi:10.35940/ijeat.B3848.129219.
   Google Scholar
• Steenberghen T, Aerts K, Thomas I. 2010. Spatial clustering of events on a network. J Transp Geogr. 18(3):411–418. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenberghen T, Dufays T, Thomas I, Flahaut B. 2004. Intra-urban location and clustering of road accidents using GIS: a Belgian example. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 18(2):169–181. doi:10.1080/13658810310001629619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SWOV. 2021a. Dutch road safety targets for 2020 out of reach. SWOV [accessed 2022 Jun 14]. https://swov.nl/en/nieuws/dutch-road-safety-targets-2020-out-reach.
   Google Scholar
• SWOV. 2021b. Road deaths in the Netherlands [accessed 2021 Oct 15]. https://www.swov.nl/en/facts-figures/factsheet/road-deaths-netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Knodler MA, Park M. 2013. A comparative study of the application of the standard kernel density estimation and network kernel density. 16th International Conference Road Safety on Four Continents; Beijing, China. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-7401.
   Google Scholar
• Ulak MB, Ozguven EE, Spainhour L, Vanli OA. 2017. Spatial investigation of aging-involved crashes: a GIS-based case study in northwest Florida. J Transp Geogr. 58:71–91. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Yi J, Chen X, Zhang W, Qiang T. 2021. Spatial and temporal distribution analysis of traffic accidents using GIS-based data in Harbin. J Adv Transp. 2021:1–10. doi:10.1155/2021/9207500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2021. Decade of action for road safety 2021–2030. Geneva. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/health-topics/road-traffic-injuries/global-plan-for-road-safety.pdf?sfvrsn=65cf34c8_33&download=true.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Yan J. 2008. Kernel density estimation of traffic accidents in a network space. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 32(5):396–406. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Yan J. 2013. Detecting traffic accident clusters with network kernel density estimation and local spatial statistics: an integrated approach. J Transp Geogr. 31:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao S, Loo BPY, Yang BZ. 2016. Traffic collisions in space: four decades of advancement in applied GIS. Ann GIS. 22(1):1–14. doi:10.1080/19475683.2015.1085440.
   Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Jannasch-Pennell A, DiGangi S. 2014. Compatibility between text mining and qualitative research in the perspectives of grounded theory, content analysis, and reliability. Qual Rep. 16(3):730–744. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1085.
   Google Scholar
• Ziakopoulos A, Yannis G. 2020. A review of spatial approaches in road safety. Accid Anal Prev. 135:105323. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar