Driving errors as a function of listening to music and FM radio: A simulator study

References

• Briem V, Hedman L. 1995. Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics. 38(12):2536–2562. doi:10.1080/00140139508925285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky W. 2001. The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 4(4):219–241. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00025-0.
   Google Scholar
• Catalina CA, García-Herrero S, Cabrerizo E, Herrera S, García-Pineda S, Mohamadi F, Mariscal MA. 2020. Music distraction among young drivers: analysis by gender and experience. J Adv Transp. 2020:1–12. doi:10.1155/2020/6039762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton BH, Behm DG, Kibele A. 2008. Effects of sound types and volumes on simulated driving, vigilance tasks and heart rate. Occup Ergon. 7(3):153–168. doi:10.3233/OER-2007-7302.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben N, Williamson VJ. 2007. An exploratory survey of in-vehicle music listening. Psychol Music. 35(4):571–589. doi:10.1177/0305735607079725.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield J, Chamberlain T. 2008. The effect of audio materials from a rear-seat audiovisual entertainment system or from radio on simulated driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 11(1):52–60. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horberry T, Anderson J, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Brown J. 2006. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 38(1):185–191. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes GM, Rudin-Brown CM, Young KL. 2013. A simulator study of the effects of singing on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 50:787–792. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäncke L, Musial F, Vogt J, Kalveram KT. 1994. Monitoring radio programs and time of day affect simulated car-driving performance. Percept Mot Skills. 79(1 Pt 2):484–486. doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. https://philpapers.org/rec/KAHAAE%0A.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie N. 1995. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 21(3):451–468. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie N. 2001. The role of capacity limits in selective attention: Behavioral evidence and implications for neural activity. In: Braun J, Koch C, editors. Visual attention and cortical circuits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie N. 2005. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci. 9(2):75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JD. 2007. Technology and teen drivers. J Safety Res. 38(2):203–213. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath MC, Gerber AS. 2019. Experimental evidence for a pure collaboration effect. Nat Hum Behav. 3(4):354–360. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0530-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno R, Park B. 2010. Cognitive load theory: historical development and relation to other theories. In: Plass JL, Moreno R, Brünken R, editors. Cognitive load theory. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Najar SA, Sanjram PK. 2018. Gaze behavior and human error in distracted driving: unlocking the complexity of articulatory rehearsal mechanism. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 59:12–23. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najar SA, Sanjram PK. 2021. Driving errors and gaze behavior during in-vehicle object and spatial distractions. J Transp Saf Secur. 13(4):381–413. doi:10.1080/19439962.2019.1611683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten CJD, Kircher A, Östlund J, Nilsson L. 2004. Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accid Anal Prev. 36(3):341–350. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00014-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pêcher C, Lemercier C, Cellier JM. 2009. Emotions drive attention: effects on driver’s behaviour. Saf Sci. 47(9):1254–1259. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle JE. 2018. Listening effort: how the cognitive consequences of acoustic challenge are reflected in brain and behavior. Ear Hear. 39(2):204–214. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recarte MA, Nunes LM. 2000. Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. J Exp Psychol Appl. 6(1):31–43. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.6.1.31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumar K. 1990. The basic driver error: late detection. Ergonomics. 33(10-11):1281–1290. doi:10.1080/00140139008925332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandin J. 2009. An analysis of common patterns in aggregated causation charts from intersection crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 41(3):624–632. doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2009.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton NA, Salmon PM. 2009. Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf Sci. 47(2):227–237. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Johnston WA. 2001. Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol Sci. 12(6):462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Turrill J, Cooper JM, Coleman JR, Medeiros-Ward N, Biondi F. 2015. Assessing cognitive distraction in the automobile. Hum Factors. 57(8):1300–1324. doi:10.1177/0018720815575149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport Research Wing Government of India. 2020. Road accidents in India 2019. New Delhi (India): Ministry of Road Transport & Highways Transport Research Wing. [accessed 2023 Aug 20]. https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/RA_Uploading.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam J, Kass SJ, VanWormer L. 2020. The effects of passive mobile phone interaction on situation awareness and driving performance. J Transp Saf Secur. 12(8):1007–1024. doi:10.1080/19439962.2018.1564947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren LJ. 1987. Engineering psychology and human performance. SA J Ind Psychol. 13(1):456–458. doi:10.4102/sajip.v13i1.457.
   Google Scholar
• Vertex Research Centre. 2015. Vertex Research Centre user manual. Tamil Nadu (India): Vertex Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D-YD, Jimison Z, Richard D, Chuan C-H. 2015. Effect of listening to music as a function of driving complexity: a simulator study on the differing effects of music on different driving tasks. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, Vehicle Design. Iowa City (IA): Public Policy Center Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa. p. 254–260. doi:10.17077/drivingassessment.1580.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenthal DL, Hennessy DA, Totten B. 2003. The influence of music on mild driver aggression. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 6(2):125–134. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00020-2.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018: Summary. No. WHO/NMH/NVI/18.20. [accessed 2023 Aug 20]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav AK, Velaga NR. 2020. An investigation on the risk factors associated with driving errors under the influence of alcohol using structural equation modeling. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(4):288–294. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1753039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar