Development of personalizable female and male pedestrian SAFER human body models

References

• Adam A. 2023. Mesh voxelisation. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/27390-mesh-voxelisation
   Google Scholar
• Ameratunga S, Hijar M, Norton R. 2006. Road-traffic injuries: confronting disparities to address a global-health problem. Lancet. 367(9521):1533–1540. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68654-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Lafon Y, Smith FW. 2009. The effects of posture and subject-to-subject variations on the position, shape and volume of abdominal and thoracic organs. Stapp Car Crash J. 53:127–154. doi:10.4271/2009-22-0005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blender LTS. 2022. Version 3.4 [Computer software]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): The Blender Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Poulard D, Forman J, Crandall J, Panzer MB. 2018. Evaluation of geometrically personalized THUMS pedestrian model response against sedan–pedestrian PMHS impact test data. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(5):542–548. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1450979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa C, Aira J, Koya B, Decker W, Sink J, Withers S, Beal R, Schieffer S, Gayzik S, Stitzel J, et al. 2020. Finite element reconstruction of a vehicle-to-pedestrian impact. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(sup1):S145–S147. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1829911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandall JR, Bhalla KS, Madeley NJ. 2002. Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection. BMJ. 324(7346):1145–1148. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7346.1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall JR, Bose D, Forman J, Untaroiu CD, Arregui-Dalmases C, Shaw CG, Kerrigan JR. 2011. Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research. Clin Anat. 24(3):362–371. doi:10.1002/ca.21152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 3D Slicer. 2021. Version 4.10.2 [Computer software]. Slicer Community.
   Google Scholar
• Danelson KA, Stitzel JD. 2015. Finite element model prediction of pulmonary contusion in vehicle-to-vehicle simulations of real-world crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(6):627–636. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.995266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis ML, Koya B, Schap JM, Gayzik FS. 2016. Development and full body validation of a 5th percentile female finite element model. Stapp Car Crash J. 60:509–544. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.995266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Decker W, Koya B, Pak W, Untaroiu CD, Gayzik FS. 2019. Evaluation of finite element human body models for use in a standardized protocol for pedestrian safety assessment. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup2):S32–S36. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1637518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L. 2001. Female compared with male fatality risk from similar physical impacts. J Trauma. 50(2):281–288. doi:10.1097/00005373-200102000-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L, Gerrish PH. 2001. Gender and age influence on fatality risk from the same physical impact determined using two-car crashes. Paper presented at: Proceedings of SAE 2001 World Congress Detroit, Michigan. doi:10.4271/2001-01-1174.
   Google Scholar
• Farvid MS, Ng TWK, Chan DC, Barrett PHR, Watts GF. 2005. Association between adipose tissue density and cardiovascular risk factors in the rancho bernardo study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 7(4):406–413. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00410.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Joodaki H, Forghani A, Riley P, Bollapragada V, Lessley D, Overby B, Heltzel S, Crandall J. 2015. Biofidelity corridors for whole-body pedestrian impact with a generic buck. 2015. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2015 IRCOBI Conference, Malaga, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Joodaki H, Forghani A, Riley PO, Bollapragada V, Lessley DJ, Overby B, Heltzel S, Kerrigan JR, Crandall JR, et al. 2015. Whole-body response for pedestrian impact with a generic sedan buck. Stapp Car Crash J. 59:401–444. doi:10.4271/2015-22-0016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golman AJ, Danelson KA, Miller LE, Stitzel JD. 2014. Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation. Accid Anal Prev. 64:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle D, Pak W, Guleyupoglu B, Koya B, Gayzik FS, Song E, Untaroiu C. 2021. A detailed finite element model of a mid-sized male for the investigation of traffic pedestrian accidents. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 235(3):300–313. doi:10.1177/0954411920976223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang E, Hu J, Chen C, Klein KF, Miller CS, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hallman JJ. 2016. Development, evaluation, and sensitivity analysis of parametric finite element whole-body human models in side impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 60:473–508. doi:10.4271/2016-22-0014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Kisanuki Y, Watanabe I, Furusu K, Miki K. 2002. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2002 IRCOBI Conference, Münich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• John J, Klug C, Kranjec M, Svenning E, Iraeus J. 2022. Hello, world! VIVA+: a human body model lineup to evaluate sex-differences in crash protection. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10:918904. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.918904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson H, Zhao Y. 2009. BRAINSDemonWarp: an applicaton to perform demons registration. The Insight J. 2009 January. doi:10.54294/ib7or9.
   Google Scholar
• Klein KF, Hu J, Reed MP, Hoff CN, Rupp JD. 2015. Development and validation of statistical models of femur geometry for use with parametric finite element models. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(10):2503–2514. doi:10.1007/s10439-015-1307-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiven S. 2007. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 51:81–114. doi:10.4271/2007-22-0003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson KJ, Pipkorn B, Iraeus J, Bolte JH, Agnew AM, Hu J, Reed MP, Sunnevång C. 2019. Evaluation of the benefits of parametric human body model morphing for prediction of injury to elderly occupants in side impact. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2019 IRCOBI Conference, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson KJ, Pipkorn B, Iraeus J, Forman J, Hu J. 2022. Evaluation of a diverse population of morphed human body models for prediction of vehicle occupant crash kinematics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 25(10):1125–1155. doi:10.1080/10255842.2021.2003790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. 2021. Subject-specific head model generation by mesh morphing: a personalization framework and its applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 9:706566. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.706566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yuan Q, Lindgren N, Huang Q, Fahlstedt M, Östh J, Pipkorn B, Jakobsson L, Kleiven S. 2023. Personalization of human body models and beyond via image registration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 11:1169365. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1169365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhou Z, Kleiven S. 2021. An anatomically detailed and personalizable head injury model: significance of brain and white matter tract morphological variability on strain. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 20(2):403–431. doi:10.1007/s10237-020-01391-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LS-DYNA. 2021. Version 13.0.0 [Computer software]. Canonsburg (PA): ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• LS-PrePost. 2020. Version 4.8.24 [Computer software]. Canonsburg (PA): ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Matlab. 2021. Version R2021b [Computer software]. Natick (MA): The MathWorks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui Y, Wittek A, Konosu A. 2002. Comparison of pedestrian subsystem safety tests using impactors and full-scale dummy tests. Paper presented at: Proceedings of SAE 2002 World Congress Detroit, Michigan. doi:10.1145/2816795.2818013.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2021. Traffic safety facts, research note, comparing demographic trends in vulnerable road user fatalities and the U.S. population, 1980–2019.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1998. Scientific expert group on the safety of vulnerable road users (RS7).
   Google Scholar
• Östh J, Brolin K, Bråse D. 2015. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(3):304–313. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.931949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östh J, Pipkorn B, Forsberg J, Iraeus J. 2021. Numerical reproducibility of human body model crash simulations. Proc 2021 IRCOBI Conf Online Event. 2021:431–443. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.931949.
   Google Scholar
• Ou Y, Akbari H, Bilello M, Da X, Davatzikos C. 2014. Comparative evaluation of registration algorithms in different brain databases with varying difficulty: results and insights. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 33(10):2039–2065. doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2330355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, Forsberg C, Takahashi Y, Ikeda M, Fredriksson R, Svensson C, Thesleff A. 2014. Development and component validation of a generic vehicle front buck for pedestrian impact evaluation. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2014 IRCOBI Conference, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, Östh J, Brynskog E, Larsson E, Rydqvist L, Iraeus J, Perez-Rapela D, Jakobsson L. 2021. Validation of the SAFER human body model kinematics in far-side impacts. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2021 IRCOBI conference, Online event.
   Google Scholar
• Piqueras-Lorente A, Iraeus J, Lorente AI, López-Valdés FJ, Juste-Lorente Ó, Maza-Frechín M, Pipkorn B. 2018. Kinematic assessment of subject personification of human body models (THUMS). Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2018 IRCOBI Conference, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Chen H, Panzer M. 2016. Geometrical personalization of pedestrian finite element models using morphing increases the biofidelity of their impact kinematics. SAE Technical Paper. doi:10.4271/2016-01-1506.
   Google Scholar
• Poulard D, Subit D, Donlon JP, Kent RW. 2015. Development of a computational framework to adjust the pre-impact spine posture of a whole-body model based on cadaver tests data. J Biomech. 48(4):636–643. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRIMER. 2021. Version 18.1 [Computer software]. San Francisco (CA): Oasys Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ptak M, Rusiński E, Karliński J, Dragan S. 2012. Evaluation of kinematics of SUV to pedestrian impact-lower leg impactor and dummy approach. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 12(1):68–73. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo Z, Beek M, Wright D, Marisa Whyne C. 2015. Computed tomography landmark-based semi-automated mesh morphing and mapping techniques: generation of patient specific models of the human pelvis without segmentation. J Biomech. 48(6):1125–1132. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider L, Robbins D, Pflüg M, Snyder R. 1983. Development of anthropometrically based design specification for an advanced adult anthropomorphic dummy family. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz LA. 2007. Non-rigid Registration Using Free-form Deformations. Diploma Thesis in computer Science, Technische Universität München Fakultät für Informatik.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Ikeda M, Asanuma H, Svensson C, Pipkorn B, Forsberg C, Fredriksson R. 2014. Full-scale validation of a generic buck for pedestrian impact. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2014 IRCOBI Conference, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Trochu F. 1993. A contouring program based on dual kriging interpolation. Eng Comput. 9(3):160–177. doi:10.1007/BF01206346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulfarsson GF, Mannering FL. 2004. Differences in male and female injury severities in sport-utility vehicle, minivan, pickup and passenger car accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 36(2):135–147. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00135-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Untaroiu CD, Putnam JB, Schap J, Davis ML, Gayzik FS. 2015. Development and preliminary validation of a 50th percentile pedestrian finite element model. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. doi:10.1115/DETC2015-47781.
   Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organization. 2018. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018: summary. World Health Organization, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Wu T, Kim T, Bollapragada V, Poulard D, Chen H, Panzer MB, Forman JL, Crandall JR, Pipkorn B. 2017. Evaluation of biofidelity of THUMS pedestrian model under a whole-body impact conditions with a generic sedan buck. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(sup1):S148–S154. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1318435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuki T, Yamamae Y. 2010. Validation of kinematics and lower extremity injuries estimated by Total Human Model for Safety in SUV to pedestrian impact test. JBSE. 5(4):340–356. doi:10.1299/jbse.5.340.
   Google Scholar