Applying the heteroskedastic ordered probit model on injury severity for improved age and gender estimation

References

• Abbasi E, Li Y, Wu X, Craig B. 2021. Using classification and regression trees (CART) to identify factors contributing to vehicle crash severity in a port city. Int J Transp Syst. 6:29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty M. 2003. Analysis of driver injury severity levels at multiple locations using ordered probit models. J Safety Res. 34(5):597–603. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A. 2013. Categorical data analysis. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez RM, Brehm J. 1995. American ambivalence towards abortion policy: development of a Heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. Am J Pol Sci. 39(4):1055–1082. doi:10.2307/2111669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anarkooli AJ, Hosseinpour M, Kardar A. 2017. Investigation of factors affecting the injury severity of single-vehicle rollover crashes: a random-effects generalized ordered probit model. Accid Anal Prev. 106:399–410. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariannezhad A, Wu YJ. 2019. Effects of heavy rainfall in different light conditions on crash severity during Arizona’s monsoon season. J Transport Saf Sec. 11(6):579–594. doi:10.1080/19439962.2018.1454561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvin R, Kamrani M, Khattak AJ. 2019. The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data. Accid Anal Prev. 132:105226. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi G, Rahimi A, Asgari H, Jin X. 2020. Severity analysis for large truck rollover crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model. Accid Anal Prev. 135:105355. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Khadem NK. 2019. Factors influencing injury severity in alcohol-related crashes: a neural network approach using HSIS crash data. ITE J. 89(3):42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood A, Roshandeh AM, Mannering FL. 2014. Latent class analysis of the effects of age, gender, and alcohol consumption on driver-injury severities. Anal Methods Accid Res. 3–4:56–91. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2014.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bose D, Segui-Gomez M, Crandall JR. 2011. Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. Am J Public Health. 101(12):2368–2373. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Gill GS, Sakrani T, Dasu M, Zhou J. 2017. Predicting motorcycle crash injury severity using weather data and alternative Bayesian multivariate crash frequency models. Accid Anal Prev. 108:172–180. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duddu VR, Kukkapalli VM, Pulugurtha SS. 2019. Crash risk factors associated with injury severity of teen drivers. IATSS Res. 43(1):37–43. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Basyouny K, Barua S, Islam MT, Li R. 2014. Assessing the effect of weather states on crash severity and type by use of full Bayesian multivariate safety models. Transport Res Record. 2432(1):65–73. doi:10.3141/2432-08.
   Google Scholar
• Evans L. 2001. Female compared with male fatality risk from similar physical impacts. J Trauma. 50(2):281–288. doi:10.1097/00005373-200102000-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). 2022. Fatalities and Fatality Rates by STATE, 1994 – 2019. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesFatalitiesFatalityRates.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Forman J, Poplin GS, Shaw CG, McMurry TL, Schmidt K, Ash J, Sunnevang C. 2019. Automobile injury trends in the contemporary fleet: belted occupants in frontal collisions. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(6):607–612. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1630825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemzadeh A, Ahmed MM. 2019. Exploring factors contributing to injury severity at work zones considering adverse weather conditions. IATSS Res. 43(3):131–138. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 143–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong J. 2021. Identifying consumer preferences from user-generated content on Amazon.com by leveraging machine learning. IEEE Access. 9:147357–147396. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung S, Qin X, Noyce DA. 2010. Rainfall effect on single-vehicle crash severities using polychotomous response models. Accid Anal Prev. 42(1):213–224. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelarestaghi KB, Zhang W, Wang Y, Xiao L, Hancock K, Heaslip KP. 2017. Impacts to crash severity outcome due to adverse weather and other causation factors. Adv Transp Stud. 43:31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Ulfarsson GF, Kim S, Shankar VN. 2013. Driver-injury severity in single-vehicle crashes in California: a mixed logit analysis of heterogeneity due to age and gender. Accid Anal Prev. 50:1073–1081. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koilada K, Mane AS, Pulugurtha SS. 2020. Odds of work zone crash occurrence and getting involved in advance warning, transition, and activity areas by injury severity. IATSS Res. 44(1):75–83. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Guldmann JM, von Rabenau B. 2023. Impact of driver’s age and gender, built environment, and road conditions on crash severity: a logit modeling approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 20(3):2338. doi:10.3390/ijerph20032338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemp JD, Kockelman KM, Unnikrishnan A. 2011. Analysis of large truck crash severity using heteroskedastic ordered probit models. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):370–380. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Fan W. 2020. Exploring injury severity in head-on crashes using latent class clustering analysis and mixed logit model: a case study of North Carolina. Accid Anal Prev. 135:105388. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Yan X. 2014. Examining the nonparametric effect of drivers’ age in rear-end accidents through an additive logistic regression model. Accid Anal Prev. 67:129–136. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafi S, AbdelRazig Y, Doczy R. 2018. Machine learning methods to analyze injury severity of drivers from different age and gender groups. Transport Res Record. 2672(38):171–183. doi:10.1177/0361198118794292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1979. Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals. In: Hensher D. A., Stopher P. R., editors. Behavioural travel modelling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarimousavi S, Anderson JC, Azizinamini A, Hadi M. 2019. Improved support vector machine models for work zone crash injury severity prediction and analysis. Transport Res Record. 2673(11):680–692. doi:10.1177/0361198119845899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik B, Tung LW, Zhao S, Khattak AJ. 2016. Weather impacts on single-vehicle truck crash injury severity. J Safety Res. 58:57–65. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2016.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickkar A, Yazdizadeh A, Lee YJ. 2020. Investigating factors that contribute to freeway crash severity using machine learning. Adv Transp Stud. 52:131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Olabarria M, Santamariña-Rubio E, Marí-Dell’Olmo M, Gotsens M, Novoa AM, Borrell C, Pérez K. 2015. Head-on crashes on two-way interurban roads: a public health concern in road safety. Gac Sanit. 29 Suppl 1(1):16–23. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.03.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahimi E, Shamshiripour A, Samimi A, Mohammadian A. 2020. Investigating the injury severity of single-vehicle truck crashes in a developing country. Accid Anal Prev. 137:105444. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon SF, Shear BR, Castellano KE, Ho AD. 2017. Using heteroskedastic ordered probit models to recover moments of continuous test score distributions from coarsened data. J Edu Behav Stat. 42(1):3–45. doi:10.3102/1076998616666279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezapour M, Farid A, Nazneen S, Ksaibati K. 2021. Using machine leaning techniques for evaluation of motorcycle injury severity. IATSS Res. 45(3):277–285. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen PT, Mannering FL, Lord D, Quddus MA. 2011. The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accid Anal Prev. 43(5):1666–1676. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamariña-Rubio E, Pérez K, Olabarria M, Novoa AM. 2014. Gender differences in road traffic injury rate using time travelled as a measure of exposure. Accid Anal Prev. 65:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay R, Choi J, Kattan L, Khan A. 2011. A multinomial logit model of pedestrian–vehicle crash severity. Int J Sustain Transport. 5(4):233–249. doi:10.1080/15568318.2010.497547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorko-Jović A, Kern K, Biloglav Z. 2006. Risk factors in urban road traffic accidents. J Safety Res. 37(1):93–98. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2005.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Hensher DA, Ton T. 2002. Safety in the road environment: a driver behavioural response perspective. Transportation. 29(3):253–270. doi:10.1023/A:1015661008598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Bhowmik T, Yasmin S, Zhao S, Eluru N, Jackson E. 2019. Multivariate copula temporal modeling of intersection crash consequence metrics: a joint estimation of injury severity, crash type, vehicle damage and driver error. Accid Anal Prev. 125:188–197. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Zhang Y, Liang F. 2009. Crash injury severity analysis using Bayesian ordered probit models. J Transp Eng. 135(1):18–25. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:1(18).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye F, Lord D. 2014. Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models. Anal Methods Accid Res. 1:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2013.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Yu R, Abdel-Aty M. 2014. Analyzing crash injury severity for a mountainous freeway incorporating real-time traffic and weather data. Saf Sci. 63:50–56. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng G, Hao W, Lee J, Chen F. 2020. Investigating the impacts of real-time weather conditions on freeway crash severity: a Bayesian spatial analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(8):2768. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Lindsay J, Clarke K, Robbins G, Mao Y. 2000. Factors affecting the severity of motor vehicle traffic crashes involving elderly drivers in Ontario. Accid Anal Prev. 32(1):117–125. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00039-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Zhao J, Pour-Rouholamin M, Tobias PA. 2015. Statistical characteristics of wrong-way driving crashes on Illinois freeways. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(8):760–767. doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1020421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar