Understanding nonuse of mandatory e-scooter helmets

References

• Curijo. 2021. Review of shared micromobility prepared for Transport Canberra and City Services (TCCS). ACT Government.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath AK, Haworth N, Schramm A, Williamson A. 2016. Observational study of compliance with Queensland bicycle helmet laws. Accid Anal Prev. 97:146–152.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeilikia M, Radun I, Grzebieta R, Olivier J. 2019. Bicycle helmets and risky behaviour: a systematic review. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 60:299–310. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnoff JT, Laskowski ER, Altman KL, Diehl NN. 2001. Barriers to bicycle helmet use. Pediatrics. 108(1):e4. doi:10.1542/peds.108.1.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiter J, Lewis I, Watson B. 2014. Promoting a more positive ­traffic safety culture in Australia: lessons learnt and future directions. J Australas Coll Road Saf. 25(1):27–35. doi:10.3316/informit.178774542857036.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan R, Watson B, Haworth N, Oviedo-Trespalacios O. 2023. The self-reported psychosocial and legal factors contributing to drink and drug driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 98:186–204. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth N, Schramm A. 2023. Factors associated with helmet use by e-scooter riders. Paper presented at: Extended Abstract, 2023 Australasian Road Safety Conference, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Haworth N, Schramm A, Karlsen K, Fyhri A, Drimlová E, Šucha M, Wallgren P, Silverans P, Slootmans F. 2024. A decision tree analysis of attitudinal factors associated with use or non-use of e-scooters in five countries. (TRBAM-24-00566). Paper presented at: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Haworth N, Schramm A, Twisk D. 2021. Changes in shared and private e-scooter use in Brisbane, Australia and their safety implications. Accid Anal Prev. 163:106451. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer AK, Banach E, Bolten N, Helweg S, Koch A, Martin T. 2022. Secondary task engagement, risk-taking, and safety-related equipment use in German bicycle and e-scooter riders – an observation. Accid Anal Prev. 172:106685. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janikian GS, Caird JK, Hagel B, Reay G. 2024. A scoping review of e-scooter safety: delightful urban slalom or injury epidemic? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 101:33–58. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkhaneh M, Kalenga JC, Hagel BE, Rowe BH. 2006. Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review. Inj Prev. 12(2):76–82. doi:10.1136/ip.2005.010942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laa B, Leth U. 2020. Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: who they are and how they ride. J Transp Geogr. 89:102874. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajunen T. 2016. Barriers and facilitators of bicycle helmet use among children and their parents. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 41:294–301. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledesma RD, Shinar D, Valero-Mora PM, Haworth N, Ferraro OE, Morandi A, Papadakaki M, De Bruyne G, Otte D, Saplioglu M. 2019. Psychosocial factors associated with helmet use by adult cyclists. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 65:376–388. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefrancq M. 2019. Shared freefloating micromobility regulations and results of e-scooter users’ survey (summer 2019). Presentation on behalf of Bruxelles Mobilit´e for the ERSCharter Webinar [accessed 2020 June 14]. https://erscharter.eu//sites/default/files/resources/presentation_martin_lefrancq.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Yang H, Mayhue A, Sun Y, Huang Z, Ma Y. 2021. E-scooter safety: the riding risk analysis based on mobile sensing data. Accid Anal Prev. 151:105954. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell G, Tsao H, Randell T, Marks J, Mackay P. 2019. Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme. Emerg Med Australas. 31(6):930–934. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.13356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi C, Ferraro OE, Montomoli C, Otte D, Morandi A. 2014. Alcohol consumption, helmet use and head trauma in cycling collisions in Germany. Accid Anal Prev. 65:97–104. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine L, Rutter DR, Arnold L. 1998. Predicting and understanding safety helmet use among schoolboy cyclists: a comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health belief model. Psychol Health. 13(2):251–269. doi:10.1080/08870449808406750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashed S, Vassiliou A, Barber J. 2022. Neurosurgical trauma from E-scooter usage: a review of early case series in London and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 36(4):1–12. doi:10.1080/02688697.2021.2024506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer K, Dodd J, Jarmin MJ, Sarvepalli R, Fatovich DM, Weber DG. 2023. Western Australian state trauma registry analysis of incidence and injury patterns associated with e-scooter injuries: 5-year retrospective case series. ANZ J Surg. 93(7-8):1890–1895. doi:10.1111/ans.18538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra GF, Fernandes FAO, Noronha E, de Sousa RJA. 2021. Head protection in electric micromobility: a critical review, recommendations, and future trends. Accid Anal Prev. 163:106430. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert FW, Hoffknecht M, Englert F, Edwards T, Useche SA, Rötting M. 2021. Safety related behaviors and law adherence of shared e-scooter riders in Germany. In: H. Krömker, editor. HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2021, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham. p. 12791. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_31.
   Google Scholar
• Sievert K, Roen M, Craig CM, Morris NL. 2023. A survey of electric-scooter riders’ route choice, safety perception, and helmet use. Sustainability. 15(8):6609. doi:10.3390/su15086609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Jami M, Geller J, Granger C, Geaney L, Aiyer A. 2022. The impact of e-scooter injuries. Bone Jt Open. 3(9):674–683. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.39.Bjo-2022-0096.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Šucha M, Drimlová E, Rečka K, Haworth N, Karlsen K, Fyhri A, Wallgren P, Silverans P, Slootmans F. 2023. E-scooter riders and pedestrians: attitudes and interactions in five countries. Heliyon,. 9(4):e15449. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen EN, Sajanti AJ, Silver EA, Koivunen V, Bondfolk AS, Koskimäki J, Saarinen AJ. 2022. Alcohol intoxication and lack of helmet use are common in electric scooter-related traumatic brain injuries: a consecutive patient series from a tertiary university hospital. Acta Neurochir. 164(3):643–653. doi:10.1007/s00701-021-05098-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd J, Krauss D, Zimmermann J, Dunning A. 2019. Behavior of electric scooter operators in naturalistic environments. SAE Technical Paper. USA: SAE International. doi:10.4271/2019-01-1007.
   Google Scholar
• Useche SA, Gonzalez-Marin A, Faus M, Alonso F. 2022. Environmentally friendly, but behaviorally complex? A systematic review of e-scooter riders’ psychosocial risk features. PLoS One. 17(5):e0268960. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero-Mora PM, Shinar D, Ledesma RD, Tormo Lancero MT, Sánchez-García M, Haworth N, Sanmartín J, Morandi A, Ferraro OE, Saplioglu M, et al. 2020. Abiding by the law when it does not exist: the case of the helmet bicycle law. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 72:23–31. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallmuur K, Mitchell G, McCreanor V, Droder B, Catchpoole J, Eley R, Smyth T. 2023. Electric personal MObility DEvices Surveillance (E-MODES) study: injury presentations to emergency departments in Brisbane, Queensland. Injury. 54(6):1524–1531. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M, Daly M. 1985. Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethol Sociobiol. 6(1):59–73. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes H, Noland RB, Andrews CJ. 2023. Gender split and safety behavior of cyclists and e-scooter users in Asbury Park, NJ. Case Stud Transp Pol. 14:101073. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar