A Year in the Life

References

• Bebell, D., Russell. M., & O’Dwyer. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cell City. (n. d.) Retrieved April 10, 2005 from http://www.open2.net/science/cellcity/cellcity.html.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. L., Schofield, J., & Stocks, J. (2001). Professional cultures and collaborative efforts: A case study of technologists and educators working for change. The Information Society, 17, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairman, J. (2004). Trading roles: Teachers and students learn with technology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, April, Portsmouth, NH.
   Google Scholar
• Henriquez, A., & Riconscente, M. (1998). Rhode Island teachers and technology initiative. New York: Center for Children and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. R., Reeves, T. C., Wang, S-K., Han, S., & Mobley, M. (2003). The impact of portable technologies on teaching and learning: Year four report. Prepared for Athens Academy. Retrieved June 5, 2004 from http://lpsl.coe.uga.edu/Projects/AAlaptop/
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Maine Education Policy Research Institute. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, student, and school perspectives. Gorham, ME: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiasen, H. (2004). Expectations of technology: When the intensive application of IT in teaching becomes a possibility. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 273–294.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. J. (2004). Identifying, teacher, school and district characteristics associated with elementary teachers’ use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(48), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed). Newbury, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M. (1999). Extending educational computing: A case of extensive teacher development and support. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 280–291.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M., & Becker, H. (2000, May). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. University of California, Irvine. Retrieved April 10, 2005 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/aera/.
   Google Scholar
• Rockman et al. (2000, June). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. San Francisco: Author
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Bebell, D., Cowan, J., & Corbelli, M. (2002). An AlphaSmart for each student: Does teaching and learning change with full access to word processors? Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College. Retrieved August 26, 2002, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/AlphaSmart-EachStudent/description.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 487–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silvernail, D. L., Lane, D. M. M. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. Gorham: Maine Educational Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• State of Maine, 119th Legislature. (2001). Teaching and learning for tomorrow: A learning technology plan for Maine’s future: Final report of the Task Force on the Maine Learning Technology Endowment. Augusta, ME: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1949). The aims of education and other essays. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. (2000, March 16). Blue Hill man inspired King’s laptop proposal. Ellsworth American. Available: http://www.papert.org/articles/laptops/blue_hill_man.html
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics and institutional change. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar