Portfolios in Contexts A Comparative Study in Two Preservice Teacher Education Programs

References

• Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Exploring the influence of Web-based portfolio development on learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3) 415–441.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A., & Baek, E.-O. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 199–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, H. C., & Carney, J. (2005). Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. Retrieved February 14, 2006, from http://www.electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/LEAJournal-BarrettCarney.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baume, D., Yorke, M., & Coffey, M. (2004). What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4) 451–464.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3) 221–244.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Michalec, P., Timmons, M., & Siddle, J. (1997). Student teaching portfolios: A tool for promoting reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 345–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten, J., Mullen, L., & Stuve, M. (2003). Program reflections on the role of longitudinal digital portfolios in the development of technology competence. The Teacher Educator, 39(2), 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. (2001). Electronic and traditional paper portfolios as tools for teacher knowledge representation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington. UMI Proquest Publication No. AAT 3013937.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. (2002). Campfires around which we tell our stories: Confronting the dilemmas of teacher portfolios and new technologies. Retrieved November 11, 2003, from http://www.helenbarrett.com/campfires.htm
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Derham, C. S. (2003). The digital portfolio assessment of teaching competencies (D-PATCO): Initial development and validation. Ed.D. dissertation, Lehigh University. Retrieved March 12, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 3117146).
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1997). Reflections on an explosion: Portfolios in the ’90s and beyond. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 21–33). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved February 12, 2005, from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7) 960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ePortConsortium. (2003, November 3). Electronic portfolio white paper. Retrieved November 5, 2003, from http://with.iupui.edu/WhitePaper/whitepaperVl_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, R. (2007). Portfolio authorship as a networked activity. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 51–58). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, R. L., & Kaner, C. (2007). Electronic portfolios through a qualitative lens. In H. Edwards and R. Narayanan (Eds.), Twentieth Conference on Conference on Software Engineering, Education, & Training (pp. 247–254). Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, D., & Barrett, H. C. (2002). Directions in electronic portfolio development. IT Forum Papers. Retrieved October 9, 2003, from http://www.electronicportfolios.org/EPdirections.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C. (2003). Renditions of professional mathematics teaching: A study of prospective mathematics teachers’ growth through the creation of professional portfolios. Unpublished dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI. UMI Proquest Publication No. AAT 3101437.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, T. L., & Haugløkken, O. K. (2004). Response groups as learning resources when working with portfolios. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(3), 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, G. R., & Morris, A. W. (1993). Activity Theory and the analysis of organizations. Human Organization, 52(1) 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2000). Portfolios: Promoting teaching. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 215–236.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., & Corrigan, D. (1995). Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(6), 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, N. (1998). Constructing narratives for understanding: Using portfolio interviews to scaffold teacher reflection. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 103–119). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. (1998). Preservice teachers’ electronic portfolios: Integrating technology, self-assessment, and reflection. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25, 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. O., Perkins, P. G., & Jones, W. P. (1995). Evaluating the use of self-assessment portfolios in a literacy methods class. Reading Research and Instruction, 35(1) 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, P. R., & Paulson, F. L. (1991, March). Portfolios: Stories of knowing. Paper presented at the 54th Claremont Reading Conference. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 377 209).
   Google Scholar
• Piper, C. H. (1999). Electronic portfolios in teacher education. Ed.D. dissertation. University of the Pacific. Retrieved February 15, 2006, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 9952616).
   Google Scholar
• Placier, P., Fitzgerald, K., & Hall, P. M. (2001). “I just did it to get it done” — The transformation of intentions in portfolio assessment in teacher education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Richert, A. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6) 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, H. H. (2004). Reflection and the electronic teaching portfolio: The nature and quality of preservice teachers’ reflective writing. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 222–227). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-L. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 56(3) 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 23–37). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Harris, C. M., Sammons, L., Waters, J., Jordan, D., Martin, D., et al. (2001). Using multimedia portfolios to assess preservice teacher and P-12 student learning. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., Lippincott, A., & Bower, D. (1998). The inherent tensions in the multiple uses of portfolios in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25 17, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• State Department of Education. (2003). Graduation options—fact sheet for districts. Retrieved September 18, 2003, from http://www.myfloridaeducation.com/commhome/newgrad/3fact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Issues of initiation and implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4) 411–433.
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2008). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Faculty perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(4), 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2005, April 21). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology program fast facts. Retrieved February 8, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/teachtech/performance.html
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, K., & Strudler, N. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Next steps and recommendations from accomplished users. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, K. & Strudler, N. (2006). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Student voices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(3), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, J. R., & Lang, W. S. (2003). Portfolio, the pied piper of teacher certification assessments: Legal and psychometric issues. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(45). Retrieved February 12, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n45
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, J. R., & Lang, W. S. (2004). A standards-driven, task-based assessment approach for teacher credentialing with potential for college accreditation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(12). Retrieved February 12, 2005, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=12
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, P., Butt, R., & Reeves, H. (1999). Portraying professional development in preservice teacher education: Can portfolios do the job? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, H., & Nanlohy, P. (2004). Digital portfolios: Fact or fashion? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Yancey, K. B., & Weiser, I. (1997). Situating portfolios: An introduction. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Situating porfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 1–17). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in U.S. teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 613–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar