Impact of Online Professional Development or Teacher Quality and Student Achievement in Fifth Grade Mathematics

References

• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt-Murray, A., Robertson, T., & Gordy, C. (2010, March). America’s teachable moment. Essence, 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, R., Kleiman, G., Russell, M., Venable, J. D., & Louie, J. (2008). Online courses for math teachers: Comparing self-paced and facilitated cohort approaches. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.jtla.org.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, J., Brown, R., Choi, S., & Thomas, S. (2008) An investigation of the impacts of teacher-driven professional development on pedagogy and student learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (2006). Highly qualified teachers for all. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 14–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. R. (2009). Creating value with online teacher learning. Education Week, 2(2). Retrieved June 2009 from http://www.teachersourcebook.org/tsb/articles/2009/03/16/02onlinepd.h02.html
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C, Breit, L., Ketelhut, D. J., McCloskey, E., & Whitehouse, P. (2005). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved July 2009 from http://www.editlib.Org/d/24557/proceeding_24557.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., Uekawa, K., Falk, A., Bloom, H., Doolittle, F., Zhu, P., & Sztejnberg, L. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE 2008-4030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M., Wayne, A., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Walters, K., Song, M., Brown, S., Hurlburt, S., Zhu, P., Sepanik, S., & Doolittle, F. (2010). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2010-4009). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Geringer, J. (2003). Reflections of professional development: Toward high-quality teaching and learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, A., Gray, T., & Levin, D. (2004). Online professional development for mathematics teachers: A strategic analysis. Washington DC: National Center for Technology Innovation, American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2006). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., & Guarino, C. M. (2004). Measuring the practices, philosophies, and characteristics of kindergarten teachers (working paper). Prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2007). The single salary schedule and other issues of teacher pay. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 574–586.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, R., & Loeb, S. (2007). A plan to improve the quality of teaching. Education Digest, 73(1), 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Haycock, K., & Crawford, C. (2008). Closing the teacher quality gap. Educational Leadership, 65(7), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2009). The curious—and crucial—case of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 68–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, G. M. (2004). Meeting the need for high quality teachers: E-learning solutions. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education Secretary’s No Child Left Behind Leadership Summit (July 12-13). Available online at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/documents/Kleiman-MeetingtheNeed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lasley, T. J., Siedentop, D., & Yinger, R. (2006). A systemic approach to enhancing teacher quality: The Ohio model. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, B. S., & Renner, A. L. (2002). Online student retention: Can it be done? In ED-MEDIA 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications: Proceeding, Denver, CO. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from the ERIC database (ERIC Document Number ED477076).
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, L. M., Masters, J., Dash, S., Magidin De Kramer, R., Humez, A., & Russell, M. (2010). E-learning for educators effects of online professional development on teachers and their students: Findings from four randomized trials. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (2003). Our schools and our future: Are we still at risk? Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. Public Law 107-110-JAN.8, 2002, SEC. 1119. (2002). Available at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Carey, R., Kleiman, G., & Venable, J. D. (2009). Face-to-face and online professional development for mathematics teachers: A comparative study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14
   Google Scholar
• Stanford-Bowers, D. E. (2008). Persistence in online classes: A study of perceptions among community college stakeholders. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Terhart, E. (2011). Has John Hattie really found the Holy Grail of research on teaching? An extended review of Visible Learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, M. H., & Ball, D. L. (2010). What math knowledge does teaching require? Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(4), 220–229.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (1983, April). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume II—Teacher quality under NCLB: Interim report. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy, and Program Studies Service.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2008). A nation accountable: Twenty-five years after a nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author. Available at http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/accountable
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C, & Zembylas, M. (2004). Online professional development: Lessons from the field. Education and Training, 46(6/7), 326–334.
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: The Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., McCloskey, E., Ketelhut, D. J., & Dede, C. (2006). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 13–30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007, no. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Inan, F. A. (2006). Examining the factors affecting student dropout in an online learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 76–88.
   Google Scholar