One-to-One Technology in K–12 Classrooms: A Review of the Literature From 2004 Through 2014

References

• American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Literature review guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/men/literature-review-guidelines.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., Hatakka, M., Grönlund, Å., & Wiklund, M. (2014). Reclaiming the students – Coping with social media in 1:1 schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K–12 education: Visions and vices. Computers in the Schools, 27(2), 121–131. doi:10.1080/07380561003801590
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 5–59.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A., & Engblom, C. (2010). Young children's exploration of semiotic resources during unofficial computer activities in the classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 271–293.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, E., Garcia, M., & Sevillano, L. (2013). ICT strategies and tools for the improvement of instructional supervision: The virtual supervision. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. (2012). Does math achievement h'APP'en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Clariana, R. (2009). Ubiquitous wireless laptops in upper elementary mathematics. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Crichton, S., Pegler, K., & White, D. (2012). Personal devices in public settings: Lessons learned from an iPod Touch/iPad project. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, S. J., Sharma, M. D., Wilson, R., & Muller, D. A. (2013). Seeing eye-to-eye on ICT: Science student and teacher perceptions of laptop use across 14 Australian schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, L., Green, T., & Hartley, K. (2010). An examination of one-to-one computing in the middle school: Does increased access bring about increased student engagement? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263–286.
   Google Scholar
• Drayton, B., Falk, J. K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(3), 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. F. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning?: 1:1 Laptop added value. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furio, D., Gonzalez-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Segui, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers and Education, 64, 24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertson, A. (2014, August 24). The LA iPad school scandal: What you need to know. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/ed/2014/08/27/343549939/the-l-a-school-ipad-scandal-what-you-need-to-know
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, W. (2007, May 4). Seeing no progress, some schools drop laptops. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/04/education/04laptop.html
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Oh, J. (2012). Learning, engagement, and technology: Middle school students' three-year experience in pervasive technology environments in South Korea. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katcher, J. (2014). Chesterfield County Schools (VA) goes Google with 32,000 Chromebooks [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2014/06/chesterfield-county-schools-va-goes.html
   Google Scholar
• Keane, T., Lang, C., & Pilgrim, C. (2013). Pedagogy! iPadology! Netbookology! Learning with mobile devices. Australian Educational Computing, 27(2), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147. doi: 10.3102/0013189×07299197
   Google Scholar
• Klieger, A., Ben-Hur, Y., & Bar-Yossef, N. (2010). Integrating laptop computers into classroom: Attitudes, needs, and professional development of science teachers—A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Tan, N., Lin, C. P., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile-device-supported problem-based computational estimation instruction for elementary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, K. (2012). You use! I use! We use! Questioning the orthodoxy of one-to-one computing in primary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, K., & Finger, G. (2011a). Informing one-to-one computing in primary schools: Student use of netbooks. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 514–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, K., & Finger, G. (2011b). Netbook computers as an appropriate solution for 1:1 computer use in primary schools. Australian Educational Computing, 26(1), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, J. (2010). Conditions for ubiquitous computing: What can be learned from a longitudinal study. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Shao, Y. J., Wong, L. H., Li, Y. J., & Niramitranon, J. (2011). The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children's geometric. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 250–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K–12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925681
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Tsai, M. J., & Paas, F. (2012). Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments. Computers and Education, 58(1), 172–180. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maninger, R. M., & Holden, M. E. (2009). Put the textbooks away: Preparation and support for a middle school one-to-one laptop initiative. American Secondary Education, 38(1), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2006). Literature reviews of, and for, educational research: A commentary on Boote and Beile's “Scholars before researchers.” Educational Researcher, 35(9), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Milman, N. B., Carlson-Bancroft, A., & Vanden Boogart, A. (2014). Examining differentiation and utilization of iPads across content areas in an independent, PreK–4th grade elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 119–133. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.931776
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annulas of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouza, C. (2008). Learning with laptops: Implementation and outcomes in an urban, under-privileged school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 447–472.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Y., & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the Time to Know program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Y., & Manny-Ikan, E. (2011). The social promise of the Time to Know program. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 150–161.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(4), 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011). Effects of technology immersion on middle school students' learning opportunities and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storz, M. G., & Hoffman, A. R. (2013). Examining response to a one-to-one computer initiative: Student and teacher voices. Research in Middle Level Education, 36(6), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(5), 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan, W. H., Woods, P. C., & Koo, A. C. (2011). A constructivist approach for digital learning: Malaysian schools case study. Educational Technology and Society, 14(4), 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrea, C. (2010). El Silencio: A rural community of learners and media creators. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J., & Stein, S. (2014). Teachers' critical evaluations of dynamic geometry software implementation in 1:1 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 134–153. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.931779
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., Niiya, M., Cotten, S., & Farkas, G. (2014). Balancing the one-to-one equation: Equity and access in three laptop programs. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(1), 46–62. doi:10.1080/10665684.2014.866871
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, E. N., & Anderson, J. (2013). The initial response of secondary mathematics teachers to a one-to-one laptop program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 279–298. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0063-2
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, A., & Hug, S. (2008). Teaching and learning physics in a 1:1 laptop school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 586–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar