Use of a Social Question Answering Application in a Face-to-Face College Biology Class

References

• Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 Higher education edition. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerlein, M. (2011). The digital divide: Arguments for and against Facebook, Google, texting, and the age of social networking. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking?: Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00086-6
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In S. Bødker, S. Brewster, P. Baudisch, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. E. Mackay (Eds.), The 31st annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470658
   Google Scholar
• Blooma, M. J., Kurian, J. C., Chua, A. Y., Goh, D. L., & Lien, N. H. (2013). Social question answering: Analyzing knowledge, cognitive processes and social dimensions of micro-collaborations. Computers & Education, 69, 109–120. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, J., & Smith, A. (2013). 72% of online adults are social networking site users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Social_networking_sites_update_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buraphadja, V. (2010). An assessment of knowledge construction in an online discussion forum: The relationship between content analysis and social network analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0042037/buraphadeja_v.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, J. W. (2015). Peer mentoring and tutoring in higher education. In M. Li & Y. Zhao (Eds.), Exploring teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 207–229). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55352-3
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University Center for Teaching Excellence. (2017, May 6). Collaborative learning: Group work. Cornell University Center for Teaching Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/resource_library/proceedings/03_62.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–777. doi:10.1119/1.1374249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 444–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624–1633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, M., & Dutta, S. (2008). Throwing sheep in the boardroom. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Garman, D. E. (2012). Student success in face-to-face and online sections of biology courses at a community college in East Tennessee (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1408
   Google Scholar
• Gazan, R. (2010). Microcollaborations in a social Q&A community. Information Processing & Management, 46(6), 693–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, U. (2011). The motivations and experiences of students enrolled in online science courses at a community college (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3489870)
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R., & Sousa, L. (2013). Teaching and learning through wikis in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(6), 627–633. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.350
   Google Scholar
• Gong, W., Lim, E.-P., & Zhu, F. (2015). Characterizing silent users in social media communities. In D. Quercia & B. Hogan (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international AAAI conference on Web and social media (pp. 140–149). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1dfd/ae5c7fb4062172d7f5db7f6371c808492fcf.
   Google Scholar
• Gress, C. L., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 806–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 286–300). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., & Lander, E. (2012). Report to the President—Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y., Ching, Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2014). Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In J. L. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 747–758). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_60
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. S. (2011). Peer-assisted learning strategies in human anatomy & physiology. American Biology Teacher, 73(3), 144–147. doi:10.1525/abt.2011.73.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, D. M., & Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers and Education, 52(3), 624–639. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC horizon report: 2013 Higher education edition. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2013-horizon-report-HE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour, Virtual worlds, real lives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Joosten, T. (2012). Social media for educators: Strategies and best practices. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Knaus, M., & Callcott, D. (2017). The lifecycle of a student-led community of practice in higher education. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education. Dreamers and schemers (pp. 423–474). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3
   Google Scholar
• Krumm, J., Davies, N., & Narayanaswami, C. (2008). User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 10–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2007). Integrating asynchronous online discussion into the classroom in web enhanced courses (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3254465)
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Liu, F., & Black, E. (2012). Undergraduates' collaboration and integration of new technologies in higher education: Blurring the lines between informal and educational contexts. Digital Culture & Education, 4(2), 248–259. Retrieved from http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/uncategorized/dce_1060_kumar/
   Google Scholar
• LaPointe, D. (2003, August). Effects of peer interaction facilitated by computer-mediated conferencing on learning outcomes. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/03_62.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki way; Quick collaboration on the Web. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Q., Pan, Y., Zhou, M. X., & Gan, T. (2012). Your space or mine?: Community management and user participation in a Chinese corporate blogging community. In S. E. Poltrock, C. Simone, J. Grudin, G. Mark, & J. Riedl (Ed.), ACM 2012 conference on computer supported collaborative work (pp. 315–324). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2145204.2145255
   Google Scholar
• Lockspeiser, T. M., O'Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: The value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Science Education, 13(3), 361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. J. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), B26–B27.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. (2012). Managing boundaries in the Web 2.0 classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012(131), 15–28. doi:10.1002/tl.20024
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, E. (2017, March 20). Top 10 anonymous social networking apps. Livewire. Retrieved from https://www.lifewire.com/top-anonymous-social-networking-apps-3485942
   Google Scholar
• Munshi, S. A. (2014). Utilization of social networking tools in the learning process by social science students at Aligarh Muslim University: A survey. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(10), 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Paskuda, M., & Lewkowicz, M. (2016). Anonymity interacting with participation on a Q&A site. AI & Society, 32(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0660-9
   Google Scholar
• Piazza Technologies. (2013). Piazza [Software]. Retrieved from https://piazza.com/pdfs/piazza_product_introduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10) [Software]. Retrieved from https://www.qsrinternational.com/
   Google Scholar
• Qualtrics Research Suite. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.qualtrics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, W. (2010). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. doi:10.1080/03634520903505936
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4), 1–11. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=innovate
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. S., Soroki, K. H., & Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning “beyond the classroom” within an enterprise social network system. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75–90. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2013). Social media for teaching and learning. Pearson Learning Systems. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/social-media-for-teaching-and-learning-2013-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. In A. Gladman (Ed.), The Europa world of learning (pp. 1–10). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, N., Rau, P. P., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)-A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust, T. (2015). Deconstructing an online community of practice: Teachers' actions in the Edmodo math subject community. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(2), 73–81. doi:10.1080/21532974.2015.1011293
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015, April 15). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wesely, P. M. (2013). Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 305–318. doi:10.1177/0022487113489032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C. (2012, February). Piazza—A Q&A forum for students & instructors to be more productive. Retrieved from http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/piazza-qa-forum-students-instructors-productive/
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar