459
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Are Teachers and Schools Ready to Accept Computer Science as a Graduation Requirement?

Pages 311-325 | Received 19 Jan 2019, Accepted 23 May 2019, Published online: 03 Jul 2019

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64–65.
  • Anderson, K. D. (2004). The nature of teacher leadership in schools as reciprocal influences between teacher leaders and principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1076/sesi.15.1.97.27489
  • Arizona High School Graduation Requirements. (2015). Arizona Revised Statutes §15-701.01.
  • Arizona House Bill 2303. (2019). Retrieved from https://legiscan.com/AZ/bill/HB2303/2019
  • Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status on teacher perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246
  • Beets, M. W., Flay, B. R., Vuchinich, S., Acock, A. C., Li, K. K., & Allred, C. (2008). School climate and teachers' beliefs and attitudes associated with implementation of the positive action program: A diffusion of innovations model. Prevention Science, 9(4), 264–275. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0100-2
  • Bell, T., Duncan, C., Jarman, S., & Newton, H. (2014). Presenting computer science concepts to high school students. Olympiads in Informatics, 8, 3–19.
  • Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425–469. doi: 10.3102/0034654316669821
  • Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education: The interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers & Education, 69, 310–319. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024
  • Brand, S., Felner, R., Shim, M., Seitsinger, A., & Dumas, T. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 570–588. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.570
  • Carbone, A., Mannila, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2007). Computer science and IT teachers' conceptions of successful and unsuccessful teaching: A phenomenographic study. Computer Science Education, 17(4), 275–299. doi: 10.1080/08993400701706586
  • Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 27–31. doi: 10.1145/1124706.1121352
  • Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35. doi: 10.5032/jae.1994.04031
  • Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349. doi: 10.3102/00028312043003343
  • Code.org. (2016a). Nine policy ideas to make computer science fundamental to K-12 education. Retrieved from https://code.org/files/Making_CS_Fundamental.pdf
  • Code.org. (2016b). Issue brief (December 2016 update): Computer science flex credit. Retrieved from bit.ly/csflexcredit
  • Code.org. (2018). 2018 state of computer science education. Retrieved from https://advocacy.code.org
  • Colburn, T., & Shute, G. (2007). Abstraction in computer science. Minds and Machines, 17(2), 169–184. doi: 10.1007/s11023-007-9061-7
  • Computing Research Association. (2017). Generation CS: Computer science undergraduate enrollments surge since 2006. Retrieved from https://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Generation-CS.pdf
  • DuBow, W. M., & Litzler, E. (2018). The development and use of a theory of change to align programs and evaluation in a complex, national initiative. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(2), 231–248 https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018778132.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02299597
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  • Gal-Ezer, J., & Stephenson, C. (2010). Computer science teacher preparation is critical. ACM Inroads, 1(1), 61–66. doi: 10.1145/1721933.1721953
  • Goode, J., Margolis, J., & Chapman, G. (2014). Curriculum is not enough: The educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM symposium on Computer science education (pp. 493–498). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538948
  • Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2012). Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Harris, C., Straker, L., & Pollock, C. (2017). A socioeconomic related digital divide exists in how, not if, young people use computers. PloS One, 12(3), 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175011
  • Howley, C. (2012). Readiness for change. White Paper. ICF International (NJ1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535400.pdf
  • Illinois State Board of Education. (2016). State graduation requirements. Retrieved from https://www.isbe.net/documents/grad_require.pdf
  • Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab) use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
  • Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597. Retrieved from http://www.teachade.com/resources/support/5031af3b48d7b.pdf
  • Judson, E. (2010). Improving technology literacy: Does it open doors to traditional content? Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(3), 271–284. doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9135-8
  • Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007
  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 464–490. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326158
  • Lindahl, R. A., & Cain Sr, P. M. (2012). A study of school size among Alabama's public high schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2012v7n1a309
  • Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 325–350. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645
  • Nager, A., & Atkinson, D. R. (2016). The case for improving U.S. computer science education. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, 1–38. Retrieved from http://www2.itif.org/2016-computer-science-education.pdf
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Oterkiil, C., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2012). Schools' readiness and capacity to improve matter. Education Inquiry, 3(1), 71–92. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i1.22014
  • Parker, M. C., & DeLyser, L. A. (2017). Concepts and practices: Designing and developing a modern K-12 CS framework. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 453–458). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017778
  • Psycharis, S., & Kallia, M. (2017). The effects of computer programming on high school students' reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional Science, 45(5), 583–602. doi: 10.1007/s11251-017-9421-5
  • Ragonis, N., Hazzan, O., & Gal-Ezer, J. (2010). A survey of computer science teacher preparation programs in Israel tells us: Computer science deserves a designated high school teacher preparation! In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 401–405). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734402
  • Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529. doi: 10.2307/2131904
  • Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.874160
  • Smith, M. (2016). Computer science for all. Obama White House Archives. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all
  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi: 10.3102/00346543072003387
  • van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
  • Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235–254. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418
  • Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238–249. doi: 10.1177/0192636506291521

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.