References
- Adams, C. A., & Thompson, T. L. (2011). Interviewing objects: Including educational technologies as qualitative research participants. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(6), 733–750. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.529849
- Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2016). Researching a posthuman world: Interviews with digital objects. UK: Palgrave Pivot.
- Beauchamp, G., Burden, K., & Abbinett, E. (2015). Teachers learning to use the iPad in Scotland and Wales: A new model of professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(2), 161–179. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1013370
- Bigum, C. (1998). Solutions in search of educational problems: Speaking for computers in schools. Educational Policy, 12(5), 586–601. doi:10.1177/0895904898012005007
- Bigum, C. (2001). Actor-network theory and online university teaching: Translation versus diffusion. In L. Rowan & B. A. Knight (Eds.), Researching futures oriented pedagogies (pp. 7–22). Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.
- Bigum, C. (2012). Schools and computers: Tales of a digital romance. In L. Rowan & C. Bigum (Eds.), Transformative approaches to new technologies and student diversity in futures oriented classrooms: Future proofing education (pp. 15–28). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2004). Flexible learning in teacher education: Myths, muddles and models. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 213–226. doi:10.1080/1359866042000295389
- Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2015). Gorillas in their midst: Rethinking educational technology. In S. Bulfin, N. F. Johnson & C. Bigum (Eds.), Critical perspectives on technology and education (pp. 15–34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bratberg, Ø. (2014). Tekstanalyse for samfunnsvitere [Text analysis for social scientists]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
- Burnett, C. (2017). The fluid materiality of tablets: Examining ‘the iPad Multiple’ in a primary classroom. In C. Burnett, G. Merchant, A. Simpson & M. Walsh (Eds.), The case of the iPad: Mobile literacies in education (pp. 15–29). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
- Callon, M. (2007). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen. In K. Asdal, B. Brenna, & I. Moser (Eds.), Technoscience: The politics of interventions (pp. 57–78). Oslo, Norway: Unipub.Cervantes, R.
- Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(1), 67–78. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-67
- Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263. doi:10.1177/030631200030002002
- Egeberg, G., Hultin, H., & Berge, O. (2016). Monitor Skole 2016: Skolens digitale tilstand [School Monitor 2016: The digital state of schools] (2nd ed.). Norway: The Norwegian Center for ICT in Education. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/tall-og-forskning/rapporter/2016/monitor_2016_bm_-_2._utgave.pdf
- Engen, B. K., Giaever, T. H., & Mifsud, L. (2014). Out of the WILD and into the schools: IPads from a domestication perspective. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1237–1242), Jacksonville, FL: SITE.
- Enriquez, J. G. (2009). From bush pump to blackboard: The fluid workings of a virtual environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 6(4), 385–399. doi:10.2304/elea.2009.6.4.385
- Fenton, D. (2017). Recommendations for professional development necessary for iPad integration. Educational Media International, 54(3), 165–184. doi:10.1080/09523987.2017.1384150
- Fenwick, T. (2011). Reading educational reform with actor network theory: Fluid spaces, otherings, and ambivalences. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(sup1), 114–134. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00609.x
- Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
- Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 61(6), 709–726. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00429.x
- Frazier, D. K., & Trekles, A. M. (2018). Elementary 1:1 iPad implementation: Successes and struggles during the first year. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(4), 463–484. doi:10.1177/0047239517737965
- Hamilton, M. (2001). Privileged literacies: Policy, Institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education, 15(2-3), 178–196. doi:10.1080/09500780108666809
- Hamilton, M. (2011). Unruly practices: What a sociology of translations can offer to educational policy analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(sup1), 55–75. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00622.x
- Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K–12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146564
- Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
- Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156. doi:10.1111/jcal.12123
- Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222. doi:10.1007/s10833-016-9271-y
- Jahnke, I., & Kumar, S. (2014). Digital didactical designs: Teachers’ integration of iPads for learning-centered processes. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 81–88. doi:10.1080/21532974.2014.891876
- Jahnke, I., Bergström, P., Mårell-Olsson, E., Häll, L., & Kumar, S. (2017). Digital didactical designs as research framework: IPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.006
- Justesen, L. (2017). Analyser med aktør-netvaerksteori [Analysis with actor network theory]. In Järvinen, M. & Mik-Meyer, N. (Eds.), Kvalitativ Analyse: Syv Traditioner [Qualitative Analysis: Seven Traditions]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
- Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers' adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education, 80, 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.009
- Kongsgården, P., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Use of tablets in primary and secondary school—a case study. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(4), 248–270. doi:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-04-03
- Krumsvik, R. J., Jones, L. Ø., Øfstegaard, M., & Eikeland, O. J. (2016). Upper secondary school teachers’ digital competence: Analysed by demographic, personal and professional characteristics. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(03), 143–164. doi:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-03-02
- Larkin, K. (2011). You use! I use! We use! Questioning the orthodoxy of one-to-one computing in primary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 101–120. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782581
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5-6), 91–105. doi:10.1177/026327602761899165
- Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
- Law, J. (2011). Collateral realities. In R. F. Dominguez, & P. Baert (Eds.), The politics of knowledge (pp. 156–188). London: Routledge.
- Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2013). ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 485–502. doi:10.1007/s11133-013-9263-7
- Lynch, J., & Redpath, T. (2014). Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 147–174. doi:10.1177/1468798412453150
- Meyer, B. (2015). iPads in inclusive classrooms: Ecologies of learning. In P. Isaías, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & D. G. Sampson (Eds.), E-learning systems, environments and approaches: Theory and implementation (pp. 25–37). Cham: Springer.
- Minshew, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy in 1:1 iPad integration in middle school science and math classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 334–367.
- Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. London: Duke University Press.
- Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.
- Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671. doi:10.1177/030631279402400402
- Mulcahy, D. (2012). Thinking teacher professional learning performatively: A socio-material account. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 121–139. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644910
- Nespor, J. A. N. (2011). Devices and educational change. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(sup1), 15–37. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00611.x
- Orlando, J. (2015). Extending understandings of educational technology: Teachers’ critiques of educational technology as important intellectual capital for researchers. In S. Bulfin, N. F. Johnson, & C. Bigum (Eds.), Critical perspectives on technology and education (pp. 51–68). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Röhl, T. (2015). Transsituating education: Educational artefacts in the classroom and beyond. In S. Bollig, M. S. Honig, S. Neumann, & C. Seele (Eds.), MultiPluriTrans in educational ethnography: Approaching the multimodality, plurality and translocality of educational realities (pp. 143–161). Bielefeld, Germany: Independent Academic Publishing (Transcript).
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
- Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Tondeur, J., Kershaw, L., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2013). Getting inside the black box of technology integration in education: Teachers’ stimulated recall of classroom observations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148092/ doi:10.14742/ajet.16
- Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212–223. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003
- Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
- Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1339–1350. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007
- Warschauer, M., Nardi, B., & Sambasivan, N. (2011). Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada: SIGCHI.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.