Who Are Online Teacherpreneurs and What Do They Do? A Survey of Content Creators on TeachersPayTeachers.com

References

• Achieve. (2011). Rubrics for evaluating open education resource (OER) objects. Mountain View, CA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.achieve.org/publications/achieve-oer-rubrics
   Google Scholar
• Allegretto, S., & Mishel, L. (2019, April 24). The teacher weekly wage penalty hit 21.4 percent in 2018, a record high: Trends in the teacher wage and compensation penalties through 2018. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/the-teacher-weekly-wage-penalty-hit-21-4-percent-in-2018-a-record-high-trends-in-the-teacher-wage-and-compensation-penalties-through-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress. Retrieved from http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/07/statistics/likert-scales-and-data-analyses.html
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2013). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolomé, L. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173–194. doi:10.17763/haer.64.2.58q5m5744t325730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Teachers at the wheel. Educational Leadership, 73(8), 30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Koehler, M., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Greenhalgh, S. P. (2019, March). Spam, spam, spam, spam: Methodological considerations and challenges for studying educators’ Twitter use. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2702–2711). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
   Google Scholar
• CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2 [graphic organizer]. Wakefield, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• CNN. (2012, September 27). See how teacher became a millionaire. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9ediTKt6a8
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards. (2019). About the standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/development-process/
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2006). Educational entrepreneurs redux. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. L., Swalwell, K. M., & Bellows, M. E. (2019). Pinning” with pause: Supporting teachers’ critical consumption on sites of curriculum sharing. Social Education, 83(4), 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, P. (2015). A market for teachers to sell, share, and shine. Edsurge. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-11-18-a-marketplace-for-teachers-to-sell-and-shine
   Google Scholar
• Grote-Garcia, S., & Vasinda, S. (2014). Pinning and practice: Using Pinterest as a tool for developing pedagogical content knowledge. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 2(1), 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. doi:10.1370/afm.1865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, J. T., & Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2017). Examining Pinterest as a curriculum resource for negative integers: An initial investigation. Education Sciences, 7(2), 11–45. doi:10.3390/educsci7020045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. M., Eckert, J., & Allen, M. M. (2014). From preservice to teacher leadership: Meeting the future in educator preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5–6), 433–445. doi:10.1080/01626620.2014.977738
   Google Scholar
• Homan, E. (2014). The shifting spaces of teacher relationships: Complementary methods in examinations of teachers' digital practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(3), 311–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Torphy, K. T., Opperman, A., Jansen, K., & Lo, Y. (2018). What do teachers share within socialized knowledge communities: A case of Pinterest. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(2), 97–122. doi:10.1108/JPCC-11-2017-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1988). Assessing the prospects of teacher leadership. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 78–106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rate. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104. doi:10.1177/147078530805000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245–275. doi:10.3102/01623737019003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCES Blog. (2018, June 21). A closer look at teacher income. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/a-closer-look-at-teacher-income
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., Kaufman, J. H., & Thompson, L. E. (2016). Implementation of K-12 state standards for mathematics and English language arts and literacy: Findings from the American teacher panel. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/t/RR1529
   Google Scholar
• Pittard, E. A. (2017). Gettin’ a little crafty: Teachers Pay Teachers, Pinterest and neo-liberalism in new materialst feminist research. Gender and Education, 29(1), 28–47. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1197380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Curcio, R., & Lundgren, L. (2019). Expanding the learning network: How teachers use Pinterest. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 166–168. doi:10.1080/15391523.2019.1573354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, C. C., & Archambault, L. M. (2018). Discovering how teachers build virtual relationships and develop as professionals through online teacherpreneurship. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(4), 579–602.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C. C., & Archambault, L. M. (in press). Learning from and about elite online teacherpreneurs: A qualitative examination of key characteristics, school environments, practices, and impacts. Teachers College Record.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter; Tweet types and purposes in #Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273–289. doi:10.1080/15391523.2019.1611507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taie, S., & Goldring, R. (2017). Characteristics of public elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2015–16 National Teacher and Principal Survey. First look. (NCES 2017-072). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017070.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teachers Pay Teachers. (n.d). About us. Retrieved from https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/About-Us
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2017). Teachers cash in, big time, by putting lessons for sale. Retrieved from http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2017/Teachers-selling-lessons-to-other-teachers-online-has-become-a-booming-business/id-3c2537fcbb2b470c8e652bf5481e4dc1
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon-Dotson, L. J. (2008). Promoting inclusive education through teacher leadership teams: A school reform initiative. Journal of School Leadership, 18(3), 344–373. doi:10.1177/105268460801800305
   Google Scholar
• Wect Staff. (2019, March 11). New Hanover school board apologizes for ‘Monopoly-like slavery game. NAACP responds. Retrieved from https://www.wect.com/2019/03/11/new-hanover-school-board-apologizes-use-monopoly-like-slavery-game/
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, H. F. (2005). The total survey error approach: A guide to the new science of survey research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2016). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher Leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 1–38. doi:10.3102/0034654316653478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (1993). The search for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 24–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. doi:10.3102/00346543074003255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar