References
- Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
- Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. International Journal of Robotic Automation Systems, 75, 661–670.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
- Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
- Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
- Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics into early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002(1), 123–145.
- Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
- Bierman, K. L., & Torres, M. (2016). Promoting the development of executive functions through early education and prevention programs. In Executive function in preschool age children: Integrating measurement, neurodevelopment and translational research (Vol. 10, p. 14797). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/14797-014
- Burleson, W. S., Harlow, D. B., Nilsen, K. J., Perlin, K., Freed, N., Jensen, C. N., Lahey, B., Lu, P., & Muldner, K. (2018). Active learning environments with robotic tangibles: Children's physical and virtual spatial programming experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2724031
- Chalmers, C. (2018). Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 93–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.005
- Chen, Y. N., Lin, C. K., Wei, T. S., Liu, C. H., & Wuang, Y. P. (2013). The effectiveness of multimedia visual perceptual training groups for the preschool children with developmental delay. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4447–4454.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.023
- Cheng, Y., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children's mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186
- Cheng, Y. L. (2017). The improvement of spatial ability and its relation to spatial training. In Visual-spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 143–172). Springer.
- Cornu, V., Schiltz, C., Pazouki, T., & Martin, R. (2017). Training early visuo-spatial abilities: A controlled classroom-based intervention study. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1276835
- Doyle, R. A., Voyer, D., & Cherney, I. D. (2012). The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.01.002
- Frick, A., Hansen, M. A., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Development of mental rotation in 3-to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 28(4), 386–399.
- Felicia, A., & Sharif, S. A. (2014). Review on educational robotics as assistive tools for learning mathematics and science. International Journal Computer Science Trends and Technology, 2(2), 62–84.
- Gardner, M. F. (1996). TVPS-R: Test of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor)-revised. Psychological & Educational Publications.
- Hawes, Z., LeFevre, J. A., Xu, C., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). Mental rotation with tangible three-dimensional objects: A new measure sensitive to developmental differences in 4- to 8-year-old children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 10–18.
- Highfield, K. (2010). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22–27.
- Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills: Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563338
- Johnson, E. S., & Meade, A. C. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference. Child Development, 58(3), 725–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01413.x
- Julià, C., & Antolí, J. Ò. (2016). Spatial ability learning through educational robotics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9307-2
- Jung, S., & Won, E. S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
- Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
- Komis, V., & Misirli, A. (2016). The environments of educational robotics in Early Childhood Education: Towards a didactical analysis. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 3(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26220/une.2751
- Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
- Mather, N., & Goldstein, S. (2001). Learning disabilities and challenging behaviors. Brookes.
- Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
- Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612
- Misirli, A., & Komis, V. (2014). Robotics and programming concepts in early childhood education: A conceptual framework for designing educational scenarios. In Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 99–118). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6501-0
- Misirli, A., Komis, V., & Ravanis, K. (2019). The constructiom os spatial awareness in early childhood: The effect of an educational scenario-based programming environment. Review of Science, Mathematic & ICT Education, 103(1), 111–124.
- Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y.-L., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(9), 1206–1227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000182
- Nam, K. W., Kim, H. J., & Lee, S. (2019). Connecting plans to action: The effects of a card-coded robotics curriculum and activities on Korean kindergartners. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 387–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00438-4
- Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29.
- Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
- Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine. Technology Review-Manchester, 96(5), 28–28.
- Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1948/1956). The child’s conception of space. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68(9–10), 521–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0
- Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Bergm, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2007). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17, 59–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
- Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education, 12, 203–219.
- Toh, L. P. E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P. W., Chen, I. M., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 148–163.
- Tsai, C., Wilson, P. H., & Wu, S. K. (2008). Role of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor) in children with developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 27(4), 649–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.10.002
- Tzuriel, D., & Egozi, G. (2010). Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: The effects of training and processing strategies. Child Development, 81(5), 1417–1430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01482.x
- Urlings, C. C., Coppens, K. M., & Borghans, L. (2019). Measurement of executive functioning using a playful robot in kindergarten. Computers in the Schools, 36(4), 255–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2019.1677436
- Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
- Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413484756
- Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.02.005
- Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). I. Spatial skills, their development, and their links to mathematics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12280
- Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
- Wang, A. H., Firmender, J. M., Power, J. R., & Byrnes, J. P. (2016). Understanding the program effectiveness of early mathematics interventions for prekindergarten and kindergarten environments: A meta-analytic review. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 692–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1116343
- Xia, L., & Zhong, B. (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computers & Education, 127, 267–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.007
- Yılmaz, H. B. (2017). On the development and measurement of spatial ability. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 83–96.
- Zander, S., Wetzel, S., & Bertel, S. (2016). Rotate it!–Effects of touch-based gestures on elementary school students' solving of mental rotation tasks. Computers & Education, 103, 158–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.007
- Zhang, X., Koponen, T., Räsänen, P., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M., & Nurmi, J. (2014). Linguistic and spatial skills predict early arithmetic development via counting sequence knowledge. Child Development, 85(3), 1091–1107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12173
- Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2015). Pathways to arithmetic: The role of visual-spatial and language skills in written arithmetic, arithmetic word problems, and nonsymbolic arithmetic. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 188–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.005