References
- Anil, D., & Ozer, Y. (2012). The effect of the aim and frequency of computer usage on student achievement according to PISA 2006. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5484–5488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.462
- Biagi, F. (2013). ICT and productivity: A review of the literature. Digital Economy Working Paper 2013/09. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC84470/jrc84470%20final%20111113.pdf
- Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., & Govaert, G. (2000). Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(7), 719–725. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/34.865189
- Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<646::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-A
- Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024
- Bozionelos, N. (2004). Socio-economic background and computer use: The role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.07.001
- Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
- Cener, E., İsmail, A., & Demirhan, G. (2015). The impact of ICT on pupils’ achievement and attitudes in social studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.67856
- Cheema, J. R., & Galluzzo, G. (2013). Analyzing the gender gap in math achievement: Evidence from a large-scale US sample. Research in Education, 90(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.90.1.7
- Choden, K., Bagchi, K. K., Udo, G. J., Kirs, P. J., & Frankwick, G. (2019). The influence of cultural values on information and communication technology (ICT) diffusion levels: A cross-national study. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1679586
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
- Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2007). Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson education.
- Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students' exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(3), 311–317.
- Erdogdu, F., & Erdogdu, E. (2015). The impact of access to ICT, student background and school/home environment on academic success of students in Turkey: An international comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 26–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.023
- Falck, O., Mang, C., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12192
- Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
- Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
- Golub, T. L., & Miloloža, M. (2010). Facebook, academic performance, multitasking and self-esteem. https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/511252.facebook_academic_performance_multitasking_and_self-esteem.pdf
- Hart, S. A., Logan, J. A. R., Thompson, L., Kovas, Y., McLoughlin, G., & Petrill, S. A. (2016). A latent profile analysis of math achievement, numerosity, and math anxiety in twins. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000045
- Hatlevik, O. E., Ottestad, G., & Throndsen, I. (2015). Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12065
- International Telecommunication Union. (2012). Measuring the information society 2012. International Telecommunication Union.
- Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011
- Kessler, S. (2011). 38% of college students can’t go 10 minutes without tech [STATS]. Mashable Tech.
- Khurana, A., Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., & Romer, D. (2015). The protective effects of parental monitoring and internet restriction on adolescents' risk of online harassment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1039–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0242-4
- Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J., & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x
- Lee, Y.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2012). The effect of individual differences in the inner and outer states of ICT on engagement in online reading activities and PISA 2009 reading literacy: Exploring the relationship between the old and new reading literacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 336–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.007
- Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 920–941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.002
- Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577938
- Looker, E. D., & Thiessen, V. (2003). Beyond the digital divide in Canadian schools: From access to competency in the use of information technology. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 475–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256536
- Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.008
- Maass, A., Klöpper, K. M., Michel, F., & Lohaus, A. (2011). Does media use have a short-term impact on cognitive performance? Journal of Media Psychology, 23(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000038
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
- Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 969–985. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.001
- Morin, A. J. S., Morizot, J., Boudrias, J.-S., & Madore, I. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109356476
- Notten, N., & Kraaykamp, G. (2009). Parents and the media: A study of social differentiation in parental media socialization. Poetics, 37(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.03.001
- Park, H., Khan, S., & Petrina, S. (2009). ICT in science education: A quasi‐experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 993–1012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787891
- Park, S., & Weng, W. (2020). The relationship between ICT-related factors and student academic achievement and the moderating effect of country economic index across 39 countries. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/26926422
- Peña-López, I. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume III). Students’ well-being. OECD. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en
- Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Research note: Individual differences in perceptions of Internet communication. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105064046
- Rosen, L. D., Chang, J., Erwin, L., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research, 37(3), 420–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362465
- Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439821862
- Scherer, R., Rohatgi, A., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Students' profiles of ICT use: Identification, determinants, and relations to achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 486–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.034
- Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), 289–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021
- Selwyn, N. (2008). Realising the potential of new technology? Assessing the legacy of new labour’s ICT agenda 1997–2007. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 701–712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980802518920
- Shaw, M., & Black, D. W. (2008). Internet addiction: Definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs, 22(5), 353–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200822050-00001
- Shin, W., & Li, B. (2017). Parental mediation of children’s digital technology use in Singapore. Journal of Children and Media, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1203807
- Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
- Stanley, L., Kellermanns, F. W., & Zellweger, T. M. (2017). Latent profile analysis: Understanding family firm profiles. Family Business Review, 30(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516677426
- Thomas, J., & Stockton, C. (2003). Socioeconomic status, race, gender, & retention: Impact on student achievement. Essays in Education, 7(1), 4.
- Tienken, C. H., & Wilson, M. J. (2007). The impact of computer assisted instruction on seventh-grade students' mathematics achievement. Planning and Changing, 38, 181–190.
- Tømte, C., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2011). Gender-differences in self-efficacy ICT related to various ICT-user profiles in Finland and Norway. How do self-efficacy, gender and ICT-user profiles relate to findings from PISA 2006. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1416–1424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.011
- Tondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., Van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2011). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media & Society, 13(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810369245
- Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Computers & Education, 54(4), 941–950. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.029
- Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Nie, Y., Chye, Y. L. S., Lim, B. S. C., Liem, G. A., Tay, E. G., Hong, Y.-Y., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2017). Latent profile analysis of students' motivation and outcomes in mathematics: an organismic integration theory perspective. Heliyon, 3(5), e00308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00308
- Woessmann, L., & Fuchs, T. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. Brussels Economic Review, ULB – Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 47(3–4), 359–386.