Topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the Journal of Research on Technology in Education: A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research

References

• Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., Roychoudhury, S., Homa, S., Puchalt, N. G., Ramasamy, R., Majzoub, A., Ly, K. D., Tvrda, E., Assidi, M., Kesari, K., Sharma, R., Banihani, S., Ko, E., Abu-Elmagd, M., Gosalvez, J., & Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5-6), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ale Ebrahim, N. (2017). How to write a bibliometric paper [Presentation]. University of Malaya.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, É., & Gagné, É. V. (2004). The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC). https://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2004_008_SSHRC_Bibliometrics_Social_Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2016a). Frequently asked questions. Bibliometrix.org. Retrieved July 8, 2021, from https://www.bibliometrix.org/faq.html
   Google Scholar
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2016b). Key points. Bibliometrix.org. Retrieved July 8, 2021 from https://www.bibliometrix.org/Keypoints.html
   Google Scholar
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (n.d.). Biblioshiny: Bibliometrix for no coders. blibliometrix.org. https://bibliometrix.org/biblioshiny/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0
   Google Scholar
• Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782459
   Google Scholar
• Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
   Google Scholar
• Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1693-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, S. (2001). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782344
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, D. D., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. (2006). Some predictors of SMJ article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C., Nielsen, P. L., Snyder, A., Sorensen, A., & West, R. E. (2012). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2001-2010. Educational Technology, 52(4), 37–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430057
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2018). An analysis of the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2013-2017. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2005). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
   Google Scholar
• Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct “just right?”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615
   Google Scholar
• Bull, G., Maddox, C., Marks, G., McAnear, A., Schmidt, D., Schrum, L., Smaldino, S., Spector, M., Sprague, D., & Thompson, A. (2010). Educational implications of the digital fabrication revolution. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782554
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G., & Hao, T. (2019). Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00149-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2020). Fifty years of British Journal of Educational Technology: A topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). A topic-based bibliometric review of computers in human behavior: Contributors, collaborations, and research topics. Sustainability, 13(9), 4859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhri, A. F., Siddiqui, A., Khan, N. R., & Cohen, H. L. (2015). Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics, 35(3), 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782359
   Google Scholar
• Çiftci, S. (2018). Trends of serious games research from 2007 to 2017: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i2.2840
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782562
   Google Scholar
• CoSN. (2022). Driving K-12 innovation: 2022 Hurdles + Accelerators.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoud, R., Starkey, L., Eppel, E., Vo, T. D., & Sylvester, A. (2021). The educational value of internet use in the home for school children: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1783402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2020). What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. E. (2016). Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among K–12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1103147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, P., Rimmert, C., & Eck, N. J. v. (2020). Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00013
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, N. J. v., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116(1), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
   Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksu, I. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, S., Viola, S. R., Leo., T., & Kinshuk. (2007). In-depth analysis of the Felder-Silverman learning style dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782498
   Google Scholar
• Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of games-based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782494
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in action: a descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, J. B., Chalela, S., Arias, J. V., & Arias, A. V. (2017). Research trends in the study of ICT based learning communities: A bibliometric analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1539–1562. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00684a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-K., Neylon, C., Brookes-Kenworthy, C., Hosking, R., Montgomery, L., Wilson, K., & Ozaygen, A. (2020). Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00031
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P., Boyack, K., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Citation metrics: A primer on how (not) to normalize. PLoS Biology, 14(9), e1002542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782399
   Google Scholar
• Lancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S. (2009). Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(5 Pt 2), 056117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larwin, K., & Larwin, D. (2011). A meta-analysis examining the impact of computer-assisted instruction on postsecondary statistics education: 40 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782572
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, Y., Seong, J., Stanescu, A., & Hwang, C. S. (2020). A comparison of network clustering algorithms in keyword network analysis: A case study with geography conference presentations. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research, 7(3), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K–12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925681
   Google Scholar
• Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word‐based, topic‐based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973–1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, J. (2001). Computer-based education: Is it a panacea? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782343
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Bacak, J., Polly, D., & Dymes, L. (2021). A systematic review of research on K12 online teaching and learning: Comparison of research from two decades 2000 to 2019. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1940396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mering, M. (2017). Bibliometrics: Understanding author-, article-and journal-level metrics. Serials Review, 43(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1282288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., & Cozar-Gutierrez, R. (2022). Computational thinking in K-12 education. An insight through meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 410–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1870250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. A., & Veer Martens, B. v. d. (2009). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., & Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report® Teaching and Learning Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782463
   Google Scholar
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Dawson, K. (2019). Setting a course for the future of JRTE: New editorial team, revision to the aims and scope, and goals for the journal. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1582273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sessums, C. D., & Johnson, M. C. (2012). Where should educational technologists publish their research? An examination of peer-reviewed journals within the field of educational technology and factors influencing publication choice. Educational Technology, 52(6), 47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430204
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, M., & Jones, W. M. (2020). The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1688739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, N. L., & Watulak, S. L. (2019). Bringing disability into the discussion: Examining technology accessibility as an equity concern in the field of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1566037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Sickel, J. L. (2019). The great media debate and TPACK: A multidisciplinary examination of the role of technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1564895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talan, T., Doğan, Y., & Batdı, V. (2020). Efficiency of digital and non-digital educational games: A comparative meta-analysis and a meta-thematic analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 474–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1743798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor & Francis Online (TFO). (n.d.). Journal Information. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujrt20
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology (USDOE-OET). (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vannatta, R. A., & Nancy, F. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457
   Google Scholar
• Vošner, H. B., Kokol, P., Bobek, S., Železnik, D., & Završnik, J. (2016). A bibliometric retrospective of the Journal Computers in Human Behavior (1991–2015). Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
   Google Scholar
• White, H. D. (2011). Scientific and scholarly networks. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 271–285). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar