Modification of an implicit approach based on nonstandard rules for structural dynamics analysis

References

• Bathe, K. J., and Baig, M. M. I. (2005). On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics. Computers and Structures 83 (31–32):2513–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bathe, K. J., and Noh, G. (2012). Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics. Computers and Structures 98–99:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebeling, R. M., Green, R. A., and S. E. French. (1997). Accuracy of response of single-degree-of-freedom systems to ground motion. Technical report ITL-97-7. U.S. Vicksburg, MS: Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R., and Taylor, R. L. 1977. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural mechanics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 5 (3):283–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, S. M., Plaut, R. H., Somcrs, A. E., and White, W. S. (1980). Stability of lattice structures under combined loads. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 106:289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, A. R. (1993). Spurious solutions of numerical methods for initial value problems. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 13 (2):263–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, B., Negrut, D., and Shabana, A. A. (2008). Implicit and explicit integration in the solution of the absolute nodal coordinate differential/algebraic equations. Nonlinear Dynamics 54 (4):283–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, B. A., and Shabana, A. A. (2011). Sparse matrix implicit numerical integration of the stiff differential/algebraic equations: implementation. Nonlinear Dynamics 65 (4):369–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, E. A. (1967). Fundamental of mathematical physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. S. (2001). Cone of non-linear dynamical system and group preserving schemes. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 36(7):1047–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. S. (2005). Nonstandard group-preserving schemes for very stiff ordinary differential equations. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 9:255–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. S. (2013). A method of lie-symmetry GL(n,R) for solving non-linear dynamical systems. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 52:85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickens, R. E. (1994). Nonstandard finite difference models of differential equations. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Mickens, R. E. (1999). Discretizations of nonlinear differential equations using explicit nonstandard methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 110 (1):181–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickens, R. E. (2000). Applications of nonstandard finite difference schemes. Fairer road., Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Mickens, R. E. (2005). Dynamic consistency: a fundamental principle for constructing nonstandard finite difference schemes for differential equations. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 11 (7):645–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghavi Riabi, A. R., and Shooshtari, A. (2015). A numerical method to material and geometric nonlinear analysis of cable structures. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 43(4):407–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark, N. M. (1959). A method of computational for structural dynamics. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 85 (3):67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pappalardo, C. M., Wallin, M., and Shabana, A. A. (2016). A new ANCF/CRBF fully parameterized plate finite element. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 12 (3):031008–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo, C. M., Wang, T., and Shabana, A. A. (2017). On the formulation of the planar ANCF triangular finite elements. Nonlinear Dynamics 89 (2):1019–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rio, G., Soive, A., and Grolleau, V. (2005). Comparative study of numerical explicit time integration algorithms. Advances in Engineering Software 36 (4):252–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaiee-Pajand, M., Kadkhodayan, M., and Alamatian, J. (2012). Timestep selection for dynamic relaxation method. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 40 (1):42–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostami, S., Shojaee, S., and Moeinadini, A. (2012). A parabolic acceleration time integration method for structural dynamics using quartic B-spline functions. Applied Mathematical Modeling 36 (11):5162–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A., and Hussein, B. A. (2009). A two-loop sparse matrix numerical integration procedure for the solution of differential/algebraic equations: application to multibody systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 327 (3-5):557–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaee, S., Rostami, S., and Abbasi, A. (2015). An unconditionally stable implicit time integration algorithm: modified quartic B-spline. Computers and Structures 153:98–111.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, A. S., Haug, E. J., and Jay, L. O. (2004). Dual-rate integration using partitioned Runge-Kutta Methods for mechanical systems with interacting subsystems. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 32 (3):253–s82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, H. T., and Kim, S. E. (2011). Nonlinear inelastic time-history analysis of truss structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 67 (12):1966–1972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, J., Haug, E. J., and Tak, T. O. (1991). Numerical methods for constrained equations of motion in mechanical system dynamics. Mechanics of Structures and Machines: An International Journal 19 (1):41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar