MotoMaker: a robot FDM platform for multi-plane and 3D lattice structure printing

References

• Ai Build. 2017. Kuka robots and their 3D printing with Ai Build. https://youtu.be/F1zu6ZhmDk.
   Google Scholar
• Alsharhan, A., T. Centea, K. S. Gupta. 2017. Enhancing mechanical properties of thin-walled structures using non-planar extrusion based additive manufacturing. Proceedings of ASME’s 12th Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC 2017). Paper No. MSEC2017-2978.
   Google Scholar
• Branch Technology. 2014. Branch technology. https://www.branch.technology/.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, J., S. Rohde, D. Damiani, R. Gurnani, L. DiSandro, J. Anton, A. Young, A. Jerez, D. Steinbach, C. Kroese, and P. Ifju. 2017. Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS and polycarbonate parts. Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, eds. S. Yoshida, L. Lamberti, and C. Sciammarella, 89–105. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, R., F. Gao, Y. Zhang, D. Pan, and W. Chen. 2015. A new parameter design method of a 6-DOF parallel motion simulator for a given workspace. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 43 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/15397734.2014.904234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, C., C. C. L. Wang, C. Wu, S. Lefebvre, G. Fang, and Y.-J. Liu. 2018. Support-free volume printing by multi-axis motion. ACM Transactions on Graphics 37 (4):1–14. doi:10.1145/3197517.3201342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, J., J. Hergel, and S. Lefebvre. 2014. Bridging the gap: Automated steady scaffoldings for 3d printing. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33 (4):1–98. doi:10.1145/2601097.2601153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETH Research Project. 2014. Mesh mould. http://gramaziokohler.arch.ethz.ch/web/e/forschung/221.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, W., Y. Zhang, D. C. Nazzetta, K. Ramani, R. J. Cipra, and W. Lafayette. 2015. Revomaker: Enabling multi-directional and functionally-embedded 3D printing using a rotational cuboidal platform. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology - UIST’15, 437–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, N., W. Lauer, F. Gramazio, M. Kohler, and N. Blank. 2016. Method of fabricating a 3-dimensional structure, mesh formwork element for fabricating a 3-dimensional structure, and method of fabricating the same. US Patent App. 14/916,475.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, N., and W. V. Lauer. 2014. Mesh-mould: Robotically fabricated spatial meshes as reinforced concrete formwork. Architectural Design 84 (3):44–53. doi:10.1002/ad.1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., J. Zhang, X. Hu, G. Song, Z. Liu, L. Yu, and L. Liu. 2016. Framefab: Robotic fabrication of frame shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (6):1–224:11. doi:10.1145/2980179.2982401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishak, I. B., J. Fisher, and P. Larochelle. 2016. Robot arm platform for additive manufacturing using multi-plane toolpaths. ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Paper No. DETC2016-59438.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak, I. B., D. Fleming, and P. Larochelle. 2019. Multiplane fused deposition modeling: a study of tensile strength. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines doi:10.1080/15397734.2019.1596127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishak, I. B., M. B. Moffett, and P. Larochelle. 2018. An algorithm for generating 3d lattice structures suitable for printing on a multi-plane FDM printing platform. ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Paper No. DETC2018-85459.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/ASTM 52900. 2015. ISO/ASTM 52900 standard terminology for additive manufacturing - general principles - terminology. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, S., and N. Oxman. 2013. Compound fabrication: A multi-functional robotic platform for digital design and fabrication. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 29 (6):439–48. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2013.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keleş, Ö., C. W. Blevins, and K. J. Bowman. 2017. Effect of build orientation on the mechanical reliability of 3D printed ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal 23 (2):320–8. doi:10.1108/RPJ-09-2015-0122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W.-C., C.-C. Wei, and S.-C. Chung. 2014. Development of a hybrid rapid prototyping system using low-cost fused deposition modeling and five-axis machining. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 214 (11):2366–74. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., A. Haghighi, and Y. Yang. 2018. A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: Design and case studies. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 33:150–60. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mataerial. 2015. http://mataerial.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., S. Im, S. Gurevich, A. Teibrich, L. Pfisterer, F. Guimbretière, and P. Baudisch. 2014. Wireprint: 3D printed previews for fast prototyping. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’14, New York, NY. ACM, 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, N., J. Laucks, M. Kayser, E. Tsai, and M. Firstenberg. 2013. Freeform 3D printing: Towards a sustainable approach to additive manufacturing. Green Design, Materials and Manufacturing Processes 479–483.
   Google Scholar
• Repetier. 2011. http://reprap.org/wiki/G-code
   Google Scholar
• Shembekar, V., A. Jung Yoon, Y. Kanyuck, A. K. Gupta. and S. 2018. Trajectory planning for conformal 3D printing using non-planar layers. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2018). Paper No. DETC2018-85975.
   Google Scholar
• Solidfill. 2017. Design guidelines for FDM technology. http://solidfill.com/resourcefiles/52fa4a1c16869/FDMDesignGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Song, X., Y. Pan, and Y. Chen. 2015. Development of a low-cost parallel kinematic machine for multidirectional additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 137 (2):21005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymrak, B. M., M. Kreiger, and J. M. Pearce. 2014. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Materials & Design 58:242–6. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallés, M., P. Araujo-Gómez, V. Mata, A. Valera, M. Díaz-Rodríguez, Á. Page, and N. M. Farhat. 2018. Mechatronic design, experimental setup, and control architecture design of a novel 4 DoF parallel manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46 (4):425–39. doi:10.1080/15397734.2017.1355249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, H., W. Jan, T. Andreas, P. Luka, H. Norman, G. Fabio, and K. Matthiast. 2015. Iridescence Print: Robotically printed lightweight mesh structures. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 2 (3):117–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R., H. Peng, F. Guimbretière, and S. Marschner. 2016. Printing arbitrary meshes with a 5dof wireframe printer. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35 (4):1–9. doi:10.1145/2897824.2925966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarkandi, S. 2011. Kinematics and singularity analysis of a parallel manipulator with three rotational and one translational DOFs. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 39 (3):392–407. doi:10.1080/15397734.2011.559149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar