An approach for design optimization of 3R manipulator using Adaptive Cuckoo Search algorithm

References

• Abdel-Malek, K., H. Yeh, and N. Khairallah. 1999. Workspace, void, and volume determination of the general 5DOF manipulator. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 27 (1):89–115. doi:10.1080/08905459908915690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi, P. R., A. C. Nogueira, and S. F. P. Saramago. 2003. An optimal design of 3R manipulators taking into account regular workspace boundary. Proceedings of 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil, ABCM, 86–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi, P. R., A. C. Nogueira, and S. F. P. Saramago. 2006. Design and optimization of 3R manipulators using the workspace features. Applied Mathematics and Computation 172 (1):439–63. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi, P. R., S. F. P. Saramago, and L. S. Coelho. 2008. Comparative study of SQP and metaheuristic for robotic manipulator design. Applied Numerical Mathematics 58 (9):1396–412. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2007.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. W., and P. J. Giblin. 1992. Curves and singularities: A geometrical introduction to singularity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulatovic, R. R., S. R. Dordevic, and V. S. Dordevic. 2013. Cuckoo search algorithm: A metaheuristic approach to solving the problem of optimum synthesis of a six-bar double dwell linkage. Mechanism and Machine Theory 61:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, G., E. Ottaviano, and M. Ceccarelli. 2008. A fairly general algorithm to evaluate workspace characteristics of serial and parallel manipulators. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 36 (1):14–33. doi:10.1080/15397730701729478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M. 1989. On the workspace of 3R robot arms. Fifith IFToMM International Symposium on Theory and Practice of Mechanism, Bucharest 2:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M. 1998. On the workspace of telescopic manipulators. Robotica 16 (6):691–6. doi:10.1017/S0263574798000460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M. 2004. Fundamentals of mechanics of robotic manipulation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M. A. 1995. Synthesis algorithm for three-revolute manipulators by using an algebraic formulation of workspace boundary. Journal of Mechanical Design 117 (2A):298–302. doi:10.1115/1.2826138.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M. A. 1996. Formulation for the workspace boundary of general N-revolute manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 31 (5):637–46. doi:10.1016/0094-114X(95)00096-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M., and C. Lanni. 2004. A multi-objective optimum design of general 3R manipulators for prescribed workspace limits. Mechanism and Machine Theory 39 (2):119–32. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(03)00109-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M., and E. Madrid. 2014. Numerical solution for designing telescopic manipulator with prescribed workspace points. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 30:201–5. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2013.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, M., V. Mata, and F. Valero. 1994. Optimal synthesis of three-revolute manipulators. Meccanica 29 (1):95–103. doi:10.1007/BF00989527.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Z. Xie, and X. Geng. 2018. GA\SQP optimization for the dimensional synthesis of a delta mechanism based haptic device design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 51:73–84. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakka, A. F. J., Assad, I. F. Alkhdour, and M. Abderahim. 2017. Statistical evaluation of an evolutionary algorithm for minimum time trajectory planning problem for industrial robots. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 89:389–406. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9050-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsar, J. 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denavit, J., and R. S. Hartenberg. 1955. A kinematics notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Journal of Applied Mechanics 77:215–21.
   Google Scholar
• Deshi, L., G. Li, and Y. Shang. 2012. Dynamic modeling and multiobjective optimization of forging manipulator during one forging stroke. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 40 (2):241–51. doi:10.1080/15397734.2012.666203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenstein, F., and E. J. F. Primrose. 1984. On the analysis and synthesis of the workspace of a three-link turning-pair connected robot arm. Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design 106 (3):365–70. doi:10.1115/1.3267420.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Alvarado, J., M. A. García-Murillo, and L. Pérez-González. 2013. Kinematics of the 3RRRS + S parallel wrist: A parallel manipulator free of intersecting revolute axes. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 38 (3):452–67. doi:10.1080/15397734.2013.781480.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, K. C., and B. Roth. 1982. Design considerations for manipulator workspace. Journal of Mechanical Design 104 (4):704–11. doi:10.1115/1.3256412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, E. J., J. Y. Wang, and J. K. Wu. 1992. Dextrous workspaces of manipulators. I. Analytical criteria. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 20 (3):321–61. doi:10.1080/08905459208905172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, D., D. Zhijiang, and S. C. Gregory. 2013. Workspace density and inverse kinematics for planar serial revolute manipulator. Mechanism and Machine Theory 70:508–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, E. R., Jr., and F. P. Beer. 1977. Vector mechanics for engineers: statics and dynamics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuk, S., and Z. Bingul. 2006. Comparative study of performance indices for fundamental robot manipulators. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54 (7):567–73. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanni, C., S. F. P. Saramago, and M. Ceccarelli. 2002. Optimal design of 3R manipulators using classical techniques and simulated annealing. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences 24 (4):293–301. doi:10.1590/S0100-73862002000400007.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., and C. Mavroidis. 2002. Solving the geometric design problem of spatial 3R robot manipulators using polynomial homotopy continuation. Journal of Mechanical Design 124 (4):652–61. doi:10.1115/1.1515796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Z., Y. Xingkun, and Z. Qianwe. 2018. Design and analysis of 3-DOF cylindrical-coordinate-based manipulator. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 52:35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max, A., and P. González. 2013. The unified orthogonal architecture of industrial serial manipulator. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 29:257–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroz, G., F. Rouiller, D. Chablat, and P. Wenger. 2010. On the determination of cusp points of 3-RPR parallel manipulator. Mechanism and Machine Theory 45 (11):1555–6. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, M. K., and R. Panda. 2016. A novel adaptive cuckoo search algorithm for intrinsic discriminant analysis based face recognition. Applied Soft Computing 38:661–75. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, E., M. Husty, and M. Ceccarelli. 2005. Identification of the workspace boundary of a general 3-R manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design 128 (1):236–42. doi:10.1115/1.2120807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, B., and W. Shang. 2014. Wrench-feasible workspace based optimization of the fixed and moving platforms for cable-driven parallel manipulators. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 30 (6):629–35. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2014.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, B., and W. Shang. 2015. A new computation method for the force-closure workspace of cable-driven parallel manipulators. Robotica 33 (3):537–47. doi:10.1017/S0263574714000411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, S., D. Mishra, and B. B. Biswal. 2009. An appropriate for workspace cross section area of 3R robot manipulator. IEEE International Conference (ICIIS 09), Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, 511–515.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, S., D. Mishra, and B. B. Biswal. 2013. Revolute manipulator workspace optimization: A comparative study. Applied Soft Computing 13 (2):899–910. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero-Riaza, H. F., L. A. Mejía-Calderón, and M. Díaz-Rodríguez. 2019. Synthesis of planar parallel manipulators including dexterity, force transmission and stiffness index. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines doi:10.1080/15397734.2019.1615503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastegar, J., and B. Fardanesh. 1990. Geometric synthesis of manipulators using the Monte Carlo method. Journal of Mechanical Design 112 (3):450–2. doi:10.1115/1.2912629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, B. 1975. Performance evaluation of manipulator from a kinematics view point. NBS Special Publication 459:39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Saramago, S. F. P., E. Ottaviano, and M. Ceccarelli. 2002. Characterization of the workspace boundary of three-revolute manipulators. Proceedings of Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, 1: 34342–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shokri-Ghaleh, H., and Alfi, A. 2014a. A comparison between optimization algorithms applied to synchronization of bilateral teleoperation systems against time delay and modeling uncertainties. Applied Soft Computing 24:447–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokri-Ghaleh, H., and Alfi, A. 2014b. Optimal synchronization of teleoperation systems via cuckoo optimization algorithm. Nonlinear Dynamics 78:359–2376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneji, H., and R. C. Sanghvi. 2014. Towards the improvement of Cuckoo search algorithm. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 6:77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. C., and A. Soni. 1981. Accessible region and synthesis of robot arms. Journal of Mechanical Design 103 (4):803–11. doi:10.1115/1.3254990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. C., and A. Soni. 1983. An algorithm for the workspace of a general n-robot. Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design 105 (1):52–7. doi:10.1115/1.3267347.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. C., and A. Soni. 1984. The effect of link parameter on the working space of general 3R robot arms. Mechanism and Machine Theory 19 (1):9–16. doi:10.1016/0094-114X(84)90004-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. C., and A. Soni. 1985. The workspace synthesis of 3R, 4R, 5R and 6R robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory 20 (6):555–63. doi:10.1016/0094-114X(85)90072-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Henten, E. J., Van’t Slot, D. A., C. W. J. Hol, and L. G. Van Willigenburg. 2009. Optimal manipulator for a cucumber harvesting robot. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 66:247–57. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2008.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. Y., and J. K. Wu. 1993. Dextrous workspaces of manipulators, part 2: Computational methods. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 21 (3):471–506. doi:10.1080/08905459308905198.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, R. 2000. Some guidelines for the kinematic design of new manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 35 (3):437–49. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00015-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. C. H., and T. W. Lee. 1983. On workspace of mechanical manipulator. Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design 105 (1):62–9. doi:10.1115/1.3267349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. C. H., and T. W. Lee. 1984. Heuristic combinatorial optimization in the design of manipulator workspace. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 14:571–80. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1984.6313328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. S., and S. Deb. 2009. Cuckoo search via Le’vy flights. Proceedings of World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC 2009 India). USA: IEEE, 210–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. S., and S. Deb. 2010. Engineering optimization by cuckoosearch. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation 2010, 2:330–43. doi:10.1504/IJMMNO.2010.035430.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. S., and S. Deb. 2013. Multiobjective Cuckoo search for design optimization. International Journal of Computer and Operation Research 40 (6):1616–24. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar