A novel mathematical approach for finite element formulation of flexible robot dynamics

References

• Al-Bedoor, B. O., and A. A. Almusallam. 2000. Dynamics of flexible-link and flexible-joint manipulator carrying a payload with rotary inertia. Mechanism and Machine Theory 35 (6):785–820. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00043-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Bedoor, B. O., and Y. A. Khulief. 1997. General planar dynamics of a sliding flexible link. Journal of Sound and Vibration 206 (5):641–61. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1997.1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirouche, F. M. L., and M. Xie. 1993. An explicit matrix formulation of the dynamical equations for flexible multibody systems: A recursive approach. Computers & Structures 46 (2):311–21. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(93)90195-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustynek, K., and I. Adamiec-Wójcik. 2012. Analysis of mechanisms with flexible beam-like links, rotary joints and assembly errors. Archive of Applied Mechanics 82 (2):283–95. doi:10.1007/s00419-011-0556-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzeri, M., M. Campanelli, and A. A. Shabana. 2001. Definition of the elastic forces in the finite-element absolute nodal coordinate formulation and the floating frame of reference formulation. Multibody System Dynamics 5 (1):21–54. doi:10.1023/A:1026465001946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. B., H. B. Lee, and B. S. Thompson. 1998. Compliant control of a two-link flexible manipulator by constraint Hamiltonian system. Mechanism and Machine Theory 33 (3):293–306. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(97)00041-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., M. K. Lim, and K. M. Liew. 1996. A nonlinear finite element model for dynamics of flexible manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 31 (8):1109–19. doi:10.1016/0094-114X(96)84602-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkaranshawy, H. A., and M. A. Dokainish. 1995. Corotational finite element analysis of planar flexible multibody systems. Computers & Structures 54 (5):881–90. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(94)00346-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Vallejo, D., H. Sugiyama, and A. A. Shabana. 2005. Finite element analysis of the geometric stiffening effect. Part 1: A correction in the floating frame of reference formulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 219 (2):187–202. doi:10.1243/146441905X10041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, E., and A. A. Shabana. 2019. Deformation basis and kinematic singularities of constrained systems. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 47 (6):659–79. doi:10.1080/15397734.2019.1610972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermle, M., and P. Eberhard. 2000. Control and parameter optimization of flexible robots. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 28 (2–3):137–68. doi:10.1081/SME-100100615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewit, J. R., J. R. Morris, K. Sato, and F. Ackermann. 1997. Active force control of a flexible manipulator by distal feedback. Mechanism and Machine Theory 32 (5):583–96. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(96)00055-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. M., and Y. S. Park. 1999. Vibration reduction of flexible manipulators using torque wheels. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 27 (1):1–22. doi:10.1080/08905459908915686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. M., J. Y. Lin, and W. Y. Lin. 1999. A consistent co-rotational finite element formulation for geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D beams. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 169 (1–2):1–18. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(91)90143-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., K. Augustynek, and A. Urbaś. 2018. Programmed task based motion analysis of robotic systems equipped with flexible links and supports. MATEC Web of Conferences 241:01008. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201824101008.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., A. Urbaś, and K. Augustynek. 2020. Analysis of influence of a crane flexible supports, link flexibility, and joint friction on vibration associated with programmed motion execution. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies 8 (2):337–50. doi:10.1007/s42417-019-00186-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, B. 1990. A finite element dynamic analysis of flexible manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research 9 (4):59–74. doi:10.1177/027836499000900404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagülle, H., L. Malgaca, M. Dirilmiş, M. Akdağ, and Ş. Yavuz. 2017. Vibration control of a two-link flexible manipulator. Journal of Vibration and Control 23 (12):2023–34. doi:10.1177/1077546315607694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermanian, A., E. A. Kamali, and A. Taghvaeipour. 2019. Dynamic analysis of flexible parallel robots via enhanced co-rotational and rigid finite element formulations. Mechanism and Machine Theory 139:144–73. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochan, K., B. K. Roy, and B. Subudhi. 2016. A review on two-link flexible manipulators. Annual Reviews in Control 42:346–67. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugrís, U., M. A. Naya, F. González, and J. Cuadrado. 2007. Performance and application criteria of two fast formulations for flexible multibody dynamics. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 35 (4):381–404. doi:10.1080/15397730701617947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahto, S. 2014. Shape optimization of revolute-jointed single link flexible manipulator for vibration suppression. Mechanism and Machine Theory 75:150–60. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbono Samba, Y. C., and M. Pascal. 2001. Dynamic analysis and numerical simulation of flexible multibody systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 29 (3):295–316. doi:10.1081/SME-100105652.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrez, M. W., and A. A. El-Badawy. 2010. Effect of the joint inertia on selection of under-actuated control algorithm for flexible-link manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 45 (7):967–80. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• My, C. A., D. X. Bien, C. H. Le, and M. Packianather. 2019. An efficient finite element formulation of dynamics for a flexible robot with different type of joints. Mechanism and Machine Theory 134:267–88. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nada, A. A., B. A. Hussein, S. M. Megahed, and A. A. Shabana. 2010. Use of the floating frame of reference formulation in large deformation analysis: Experimental and numerical validation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 224 (1):45–58. doi:10.1243/14644193JMBD208.
   Google Scholar
• Naganathan, G., and A. H. Soni. 1987. Coupling effects of kinematics and flexibility in manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research 6 (1):75–84. doi:10.1177/027836498700600106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., S. Mao, E. J. Haug, and D. Solis. 2003. Efficient modal approach for flexible multibody dynamic simulation. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 31 (1):1–23. doi:10.1081/SME-120017107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y. C., R. A. Scott, and A. G. Ulsoy. 1990. Dynamic modeling and simulation of flexible robots with prismatic joints. Journal of Mechanical Design 112 (3):307–14. doi:10.1115/1.2912609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Płosa, J., and S. Wojciech. 2000. Dynamics of systems with changing configuration and with flexible beam-like links. Mechanism and Machine Theory 35 (11):1515–34. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(00)00014-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raouf, F., S. Mohamad, S. Maarouf, and B. Maamar. 2017. Distributed adaptive control strategy for flexible link manipulators. Robotica 35 (7):1562–84. doi:10.1017/S0263574716000448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayahkarajy, M., Z. Mohamed, and A. A. Mohd Faudzi. 2016. Review of modelling and control of flexible-link manipulators. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 230 (8):861–73. doi:10.1177/0959651816642099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A. 1996a. An absolute nodal coordinate formulation for the large rotation and deformation analysis of flexible bodies. Technical Report No. MBS96-1-UIC. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A. 1996b. Finite element incremental approach and exact rigid body inertia. Journal of Mechanical Design 118 (2):171–8. doi:10.1115/1.2826866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A. 1997a. Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments. Multibody System Dynamics 1 (2):189–222. doi:10.1023/A:1009773505418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A. 1997b. Vibration of discrete and continuous systems. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A. 2020. Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A., and R. Schwertassek. 1998. Equivalence of the floating frame of reference approach and finite element formulations. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 33 (3):417–32. doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(97)00024-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana, A. A., and R. Y. Yakoub. 2001. Three dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: Theory. Journal of Mechanical Design 123 (4):606–13. doi:10.1115/1.1410100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, P., and J. McPhee. 2002. Symbolic programming of a graph-theoretic approach to flexible multibody dynamics. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 30 (1):123–54. doi:10.1081/SME-120001480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, P., J. McPhee, and G. Heppler. 2001. Polynomial shape functions and numerical methods for flexible multibody dynamics. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 29 (1):43–64. doi:10.1081/SME-100000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subudhi, B., and A. S. Morris. 2002. Dynamic modelling, simulation and control of a manipulator with flexible links and joints. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 41 (4):257–70. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00295-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokhi, M. O., Z. Mohamed, and M. H. Shaheed. 2001. Dynamic characterisation of a flexible manipulator system. Robotica 19 (5):571–80. doi:10.1017/S0263574700003209.
   Google Scholar
• Usoro, P. B., R. Nadira, and S. S. Mahil. 1986. A finite element/lagrange approach to modeling lightweight flexible manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 108 (3):198–205. doi:10.1115/1.3143768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallrapp, O. 1991. Linearized flexible multibody dynamics including geometric stiffening effects. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 19 (3):385–409. doi:10.1080/08905459108905149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallrapp, O. 1994. Standardization of flexible body modeling in multibody system codes, Part I: Definition of standard input data. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 22 (3):283–304. doi:10.1080/08905459408905214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and J. K. Mills. 2006. Dynamic modeling of a flexible-link planar parallel platform using a substructuring approach. Mechanism and Machine Theory 41 (6):671–87. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2005.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittbrodt, E., I. Adamiec-Wójcik, and S. Wojciech. 2007. Dynamics of flexible multibody systems: Rigid finite element method. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. C., E. J. Haug, and S. S. Kim. 1989. A variational approach to dynamics of flexible multibody systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 17 (1):3–32. doi:10.1080/089054508915627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariev, E. V. 2006. Generalized finite element approach to dynamics modeling of rigid and flexible systems. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 34 (1):81–109. doi:10.1080/15397730600632013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhariev, E. V. 2000. Nonlinear dynamics of rigid and flexible multibody systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 28 (1):105–36. doi:10.1081/SME-100100614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar