Dynamics analysis of a spatial rigid-flexible linkage model subjected to optimized programmed constraints

References

• Aghili, F. 2005. A unified approach for inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems based on linear projection operator: Applications to control and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21 (5):834–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2005.851380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustynek, K., and A. Urbaś. 2018. Mathematical modelling of spatial linkages with clearance, friction and links' flexibility effects. Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, June 24–28, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Augustynek, K., and K. Warwas. 2015. An application of artificial neural network to choose optimal drive functions of the satellite. Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems IDAACS’2015: Technology and Applications, September 24–26, Warsaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarte, J. 1972. Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1 (1):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(72)90018-7.
   Google Scholar
• Guanfeng, L., and L. Zexiang. 2002. A unified geometric approach to modeling and control of constrained mechanical systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18:574–87.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E. 2008. Advanced programmed motion tracking control of nonholonomic mechanical systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24:1315–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E. 2012. Model-based tracking control of nonlinear systems. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, Series; Modern Mechanics and Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E. 2015. Advanced task tracking control design for robotics-like systems. In Mechatronics - ideas for industrial application. 317 series Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ed. J. Awrejcewicz, 203–29. Cham; Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., K. Augustynek, and A. Urbaś. 2018a. Automated generation of reference dynamical models for constrained robotic systems in the presence of friction and damping effects. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 31 (22):e442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., K. Augustynek, and A. Urbaś. 2018b. Programmed task based motion analysis of robotic systems equipped with flexible links and supports. Matec Web Conf. 241, CSNDD, art. no 01008, Tangier, Morocco. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824101008.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., K. Augustynek, and A. Urbaś. 2019. Dynamics and vibration analysis of a spatial linkage model with flexible links and joint friction subjected to position and velocity motion constraints. Proceedings of the Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications (DSTA) Conference, Łódź, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzębowska, E., and P. Sanjuan Szklarz. 2017. Model-based control of a third order nonholonomic system. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 22 (6):1397–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286516634827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korayem, M. H., H. N. Rahimi, and A. Nikoobin. 2012. Mathematical modelling and trajectory planning of mobile manipulators with flexible links and joints. Applied Mathematical Modelling 36 (7):3229–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwatny, H. G., and G. L. Blankenship. 2000. Nonlinear control and analytical mechanics. A computational approach. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Lot, R., and M. Da Lio. 2004. Symbolic approach for automatic generation of the equations of motion of multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics 12 (2):147–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MUBO.0000044319.63215.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, J. Q., and Y. D. Wei. 2011. Dynamic modelling and vibration control of a space flexible manipulator using piezoelectric actuators and sensors. Advanced Materials Research 345:46–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.345.46.
   Google Scholar
• Luersen, M., and R. Le Riche. 2004. Globalized Nelder-Mead method for engineering optimization. Computers and Structures 2004:2251–60.
   Google Scholar
• Press, W., S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery. 2007. Numerical recipes 3rd edition: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, M. J., J. J. McPhee, and R. J. Anderson. 2007. Computerized generation of motion equations using variational graph-theoretic methods. Applied Mathematics and Computation 192 (1):135–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.02.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiehlen, W., N. Guse, and R. Seifried. 2006. Multibody dynamics in computational mechanics and engineering applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 195 (41–43):5509–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittbrodt, E., I. Adamiec-Wójcik, and S. Wojciech. 2006. Dynamics of flexible multibody systems. Rigid finite element method. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar