Design, rapid manufacturing and modeling of a reduced-scale forwarder crane with closed kinematic chain

References

• Arnold, M. 2017. DAE aspects of multibody system dynamics. In
   Google Scholar
  Surveys in differential-algebraic equations IV, 41–206. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bin Ishak, I., D. Fleming, and P. Larochelle. 2019. Multiplane fused deposition modeling: A study of tensile strength. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 47 (5):5:583–598. doi:10.1080/15397734.2019.1596127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Ishak, I., and P. Larochelle. 2019. Motomaker: A robot fdm platform for multi-plane and 3d lattice structure printing. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 47 (6):703–20. doi:10.1080/15397734.2019.1615943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, S., and A. Alleyne. 2001. Using a scale testbed: Controller design and evaluation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, J., F. Mazzariol, E. Bertoti, E. Dos Santos Costa, F. Corrêa, C. de Alkmin, and F. Giuseppe. 2018. Gear shifting multi-objective optimization to improve vehicle performance, fuel consumption, and engine emissions. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46 (2):238–53. doi:10.1080/15397734.2017.1330156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban, E., O. Salgado, A. Iturrospe, and I. Isasa. 2017. Design methodology of a reduced-scale test bench for fault detection and diagnosis. Mechatronics 47:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favrel, A., J. Pereira Junior, C. Landry, A. M, K. Yamaishi, and F. Avellan. 2019. Dynamic modal analysis during reduced scale model tests of hydraulic turbines for hydro-acoustic characterization of cavitation flows. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 117:81–96. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaz, C., E. Magrini, and A. De Luca. 2018. A model-based residual approach for human-robot collaboration during manual polishing operations. Mechatronics 55:234–47. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glocker, C. 2013. Set-valued force laws: Dynamics of non-smooth systems. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström, C., and O. Lindroos. 2016. Human, technology, organization and environment – A human factors perspective on performance in forest harvesting. International Journal of Forest Engineering 27:67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., and M. Abomoharam. 2017. Modeling and design optimization of a robot gripper mechanism. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 46:94–103. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2016.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmari, J., J. Backman, and A. Visala. 2017. Coordinated motion of a hydraulic forestry crane and a vehicle using nonlinear model predictive control. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 133:119–27. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivumäki, J., and J. Mattila. 2015. Stability-guaranteed force-sensorless contact force/motion control of heavy-duty hydraulic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31 (4):918–35. doi:10.1109/TRO.2015.2441492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Hera, P., and D. Ortiz Morales. 2014. Non-linear dynamics modeling description for simulating the behaviour of forestry cranes. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control 21 (2):125–37. doi:10.1504/IJMIC.2014.060006.
   Google Scholar
• La Hera, P., and D. Ortiz Morales. 2019. What do we observe when we equip a forestry crane with motion sensors? Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 40 (2):259–80. doi:10.5552/crojfe.2019.501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., G. Wang, S. Miao, and X. Li. 2017. Optimal design of a hydraulic excavator working device based on parallel particle swarm optimization. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 39 (10):3793–805. doi:10.1007/s40430-017-0798-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, L. 1999. System identification: Theory for the user. NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
   Google Scholar
• Manner, J., A. Mörk, and M. Englund. 2019. Comparing forwarder boom-control systems based on an automatically recorded follow-up dataset. Silva Fennica 53 (2):10161. doi:10.14214/sf.10161.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, J., J. Koivumäki, D. Caldwell, and C. Semini. 2017. A survey on control of hydraulic robotic manipulators with projection to future trends. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 22 (2):669–80. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2017.2668604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Trejo, O., and C. Cruz-Villar. 2016. Modelling and experimental validation of a planar 2-dof cobot as a differential-algebraic equation system. Applied Mathematical Modelling 40 (21-22):9327–41. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, S., M. Lapeyre, P. Rouanet, C. Halgand, J. Benois-Pineau, F. Paclet, D. Cattaert, P. Oudeyer, and A. Rugy. 2019. Reachy, a 3d-printed human-like robotic arm as a testbed for human-robot control strategies. Frontier in Neurorobotics 13 (65). doi:10.3389/fnbot.2019.00065.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitrev, R., D. Janosević, and D. Marinković. 2017. Dynamical moodeling of hydraulic excavator considered as a multibody system. Technical Gazzete 24 (2):327–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrev, R., and D. Marinković. 2019. Numerical study of the hydraulic excavator overturning stability during performing lifting operations. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 11 (5):168781401984177–14. doi:10.1177/1687814019841779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, D. O., P. L. Hera, S. Westerberg, L. B. Freidovich, and A. S. Shiriaev. 2015. Path-constrained motion analysis: An algorithm to understand human performance on hydraulic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 45 (2):187–99. doi:10.1109/THMS.2014.2366873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordfjell, T., E. Öhman, O. Lindroos, and B. Ager. 2019. The technical development of forwarders in modeli between 1962 and 2012 and of sales between 1975 and 2017. International Journal of Forest Engineering 30 (1):1–13. doi:10.1080/14942119.2019.1591074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, H., K. J. Åström, C. C. De Wit, M. Gäfvert, and P. Lischinsky. 1998. Friction models and friction compensation. European Journal of Control 4 (3):176–95. doi:10.1016/S0947-3580(98)70113-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz Morales, D., S. Westerberg, P. X. La Hera, U. Mettin, L. Freidovich, and A. S. Shiriaev. 2014. Increasing the level of automation in the forestry logging process with crane trajectory planning and control. Journal of Field Robotics 31 (3):343–63. doi:10.1002/rob.21496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, F., J. Choi, and S. Ploen. 1999. Symbolic formulation of closed chain dynamics in independent coordinates. Mechanism and Machine Theory 34 (5):731–51. doi:10.1016/S0094-114X(98)00052-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinić, S., G. Bosković, and M. Nikolić. 2014. Dynamic modeling of hydraulic excavator motion using Kane’s equations. Automation in Construction 44:56–62. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, B. L. Sciavicco, L. Villani, and G. Oriolo. 2010. Robotics modeling, planning and control. NJ: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Spong, M. S. Hutchinson, and M. Vidyasagar. 2006. Robotics modeling and control. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vallés, M., P. Araujo-Gómez, V. Mata, A. Valera, M. Díaz-Rodríguez, A. Page, and M. Farhat. 2018. Mechatronic design, experimental setup, and control architecture design of a novel 4 dof parallel manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 46 (4):425–39. doi:10.1080/15397734.2017.1355249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihonen, J., J. Mattila, and A. Visa. 2017. Joint-space kinematic model for gravity-referenced joint angle estimation of heavy-duty manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 66 (12):3280–8. doi:10.1109/TIM.2017.2749918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, G., H. Ding, and Z. Feng. 2019. Optimal design of hydraulic excavator shovel attachment based on multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 24 (2):808–19. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2019.2903140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar