Energy optimal point-to-point motion profile optimization

References

• Baggetta, M., P. Bilancia, M. Pellicciari, and G. Berselli. 2021. An integrated approach for motion law optimization in partially compliant slider-crank mechanisms. In 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR 2021, 695–700. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Berselli, G., F. Balugani, M. Pellicciari, and M. Gadaleta. 2016. Energy-optimal motions for servo-systems: A comparison of spline interpolants and performance indexes using a CAD-based approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 40:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J. T. 1998. A survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 21 (2):193–207. doi:10.2514/2.4231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagiotti, L, and C. Melchiorri. 2021. Optimization of generalized S-curve trajectories for residual vibration suppression and compliance with kinematic bounds. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 26 (5):2724–34. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2020.3045504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, H. 2008. Electric Motors—Alignment of Standards and Best Practice Programmes with APEC. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Boryga, M, and A. Graboś. 2009. Planning of manipulator motion trajectory with higher-degree polynomials use. Mechanism and Machine Theory 44 (7):1400–19. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscariol, P., R. Caracciolo, D. Richiedei, and A. Trevisani. 2020. Energy optimization of functionally redundant robots through motion design. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 10 (9):3022–13. doi:10.3390/app10093022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, R., C. Rossi, and F. Timpone. 2007. Dynamic behavior and motion planning of a robot arm with non-rigid transmission. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 35 (4):347–62. doi:10.1080/15397730701606627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabin, G, and L. Scalera. 2020. On the trajectory planning for energy efficiency in industrial robotic systems. Robotics 9 (4):89–13. doi:10.3390/robotics9040089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabin, G, and R. Vidoni. 2021. Energy-saving optimization method for point-to-point trajectories planned via standard primitives in 1-DoF mechatronic systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 116 (1-2):331–4. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-07277-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabin, G., E. Wehrle, and R. Vidoni. 2017. A review on energy-saving optimization methods for robotic and automatic systems. Robotics 6 (4):39–21. doi:10.3390/robotics6040039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., W. Xu, Z. Liu, X. Hao, and Y. Wang. 2021. Optimal trajectory planning of the variable-stiffness flexible manipulator based on CADE algorithm for vibration reduction Control. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9:766495–14. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.766495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chettibi, T., H. Lehtihet, M. Hadda, and S. Hanchi. 2004. Minimum cost trajectory planning for industrial robots. European Journal of Mechanics—A/Solids 23 (4):703–15. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delchev, K, and E. Zahariev. 2008. Computer simulation-based synthesis of learning-control law of robots. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 36 (3):225–48. doi:10.1080/15397730802275405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., H. G. Bock, H. Diedam, and P.-B. Wieber. 2006. Fast direct multiple shooting algorithms for optimal robot control. In Fast Motions in Biomechanics and Robotics: Optimization and Feedback Control, eds. M. Diehl and K. Mombaur, 65–93. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Dresig, H, and F. Holzweißig. 2010. Dynamics of machinery: Theory and applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. 2012. Control system design guide (4th ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gadaleta, M., M. Pellicciari, and G. Berselli. 2019. Optimization of the energy consumption of industrial robots for automatic code generation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 57:452–64. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparetto, A, and V. Zanotto. 2007. A new method for smooth trajectory planning of robot manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 42 (4):455–71. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glodde, A, and M. Afrough. 2014. Energy efficiency evaluation of an underactuated robot in comparison to traditional robot kinematics. Procedia CIRP 23 (C):127–30. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.087.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, J. L., R. F. Fung, K. Y. Chen, and S. C. Hsien. 2006. Dynamic modeling and identification of a slider-crank mechanism. Journal of Sound and Vibration 289 (4-5):1019–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2005.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. L., M. S. Huang, and R. F. Fung. 2014. Energy-saving trajectory planning for a toggle mechanism driven by a PMSM. Mechatronics 24 (1):23–31. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., P. Hu, K. Wu, and M. Zeng. 2018. Optimal time-jerk trajectory planning for industrial robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory 121:530–44. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. P. 2017. Transcription methods for trajectory optimization: A beginners tutorial. SIAM Review 59 (4):849–904. doi:10.1137/16M1062569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, E. 2008. Drive solutions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuenzer, U, and M. L. Husty. 2016. Generation and optimal choice of joint trajectories using all solutions of inverse kinematics of general 6-R robots. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 44 (1-2):146–59. doi:10.1080/15397734.2016.1152192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D, and C. W. Ha. 2020. 9) Optimization process for polynomial motion profiles to achieve fast movement with low vibration. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 28 (5):1892–901. doi:10.1109/TCST.2020.2998094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidian, H. 2017. On the decay rate of Chebyshev coefficients. Applied Numerical Mathematics 113:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, F, and E. Galligani. 2016. A Chebyshev technique for the solution of optimal control problems with nonlinear programming methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 121:95–108. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2015.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, K. D., I. M. Chen, and T. C. Ng. 2007. Planning Algorithms for S-curve Trajectories. In IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM, Volume 1, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J, and S. Wright. 2006. Numerical optimization (2nd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. S. 1996. Motion profile planning of repetitive point-to-point control for maximum energy conversion efficiency under acceleration conditions. Mechatronics 6 (6):649–63. doi:10.1016/0957-4158(96)00012-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicciari, M., G. Berselli, and F. Balugani. 2015. On designing optimal trajectories for servo-actuated mechanisms: Detailed virtual prototyping and experimental evaluation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 20 (5):2039–52. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2014.2361759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazzi, A, and A. Visioli. 1998. Global minimum-time trajectory planning of mechanical manipulators using interval analysis. International Journal of Control 71 (4):631–52. doi:10.1080/002071798221713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. V. 2014. Trajectory optimization: A survey. In Optimization in automotive control and optimal systems, eds. H. Waschl, I. Kolmanovsky, M. Steinbuch, and L. del Re, Vo. 455. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 3–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Richiedei, D, and A. Trevisani. 2016. Analytical computation of the energy-efficient optimal planning in rest-to-rest motion of constant inertia systems. Mechatronics 39:147–59. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzoni, G, and J. Kearns. 2003. Principles and applications of electrical engineering. McGraw-Hill (London).
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, Z. 1996. Time-energy optimal control of articulated systems with geometric path constraints. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 118 (1):139–43. doi:10.1115/1.2801134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollmann, K., M. Jouaneh, and D. Lavender. 2010. Dynamic modeling of a two-axis parallel H-frame-type XY positioning system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 15 (2):280–90. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2009.2020823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. J. 1994. Chebyshev polynomials: After the spelling the rest is easy. Computers in Physics 8 (2):161. doi:10.1063/1.4823278.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterwyck, N., A. Ben Yahya, A. Cuyt, and S. Derammelaere. 2020. CAD based trajectory optimization of PTP motions using Chebyshev polynomials. In 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Boston, pp. 403–408. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterwyck, N., F. Vanbecelaere, M. Haemers, D. Ceulemans, K. Stockman, and S. Derammelaere. 2019. CAD enabled trajectory optimization and accurate motion control for repetitive tasks. In 2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA), 387–92. Edinburgh: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Vanbecelaere, F., N. Van Oosterwyck, S. Derammelaere, A. Cuyt, M. Monte, and K. Stockman. 2022. On-line motion profile optimization for reciprocating mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory 173:104833. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanbecelaere, F., S. Derammelaere, N. Nevaranta, J. De Viaene, F. Verbelen, K. Stockman, and M. Monte. 2020. Online tracking of varying inertia using a SDFT approach. Mechatronics 68:102361. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2020.102361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlassenbroeck, J, and R. Van Dooren. 1988. A Chebyshev technique for solving nonlinear optimal control problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 33 (4):333–40. doi:10.1109/9.192187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsch, H., I. Kolmanovsky, M. Steinbuch, and L. del Re. 2014. Optimization and optimal control in automotive systems, Vol. 455. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzhong, G, and S. K. Porandla. 2005. Design optimization of a parallel hybrid electric powertrain. 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC 2005, 530–535. doi:10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554609.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, L. C. 2001. Handbook of control systems engineering. Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., J. Chen, T. Bao, J. Wang, L. Zhang, and F. Xu. 2022. A novel point-to-point trajectory planning algorithm for industrial robots based on a locally asymmetrical jerk motion profile. Processes 10 (4):728–18. doi:10.3390/pr10040728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar