The effects of coolant on the cutting temperature, surface roughness and tool wear in turning operations of Ti6Al4V alloy

References

• Agmell, M., V. Bushlya, R. M’Saoubi, O. Gutnichenko, O. Zaporozhets, S. V. Laakso, and J.-E. Ståhl. 2020. Investigation of mechanical and thermal loads in pcBN tooling during machining of Inconel 718. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 107 (3–4):1451–62. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, C., J. Wadhwa, A. Pitroda, C. I. Pruncu, M. Sarikaya, and N. Khanna. 2021. Comprehensive analysis of tool wear, tool life, surface roughness, costing and carbon emissions in turning Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy: Cryogenic versus wet machining. Tribology International 153:106597. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airao, J., C. K. Nirala, R. Bertolini, G. M. Krolczyk, and N. Khanna. 2022. Sustainable cooling strategies to reduce tool wear, power consumption and surface roughness during ultrasonic assisted turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Tribology International 169:107494. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, M. A., A. Samanta, R. A. Behnagh, and H. Ding. 2019. An efficient coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element model for friction stir processing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 101 (5–8):1495–508. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-3000-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, R. P., T. L. Rolim, C. A. Oliveira, A. E. Moura, and J. C. A. Silva. 2019. Analysis of the surface roughness and cutting tool wear using a vapor compression assisted cooling system to cool the cutting fluid in turning operation. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 44:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atabey, F., I. Lazoglu, and Y. Altintas. 2003. Mechanics of boring processes—part I. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 43 (5):463–76. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00276-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaabani, S., P. J. Arrazola, Y. Ayed, A. Madariaga, A. Tidu, and G. Germain. 2020. Comparison between cryogenic coolants effect on tool wear and surface integrity in finishing turning of Inconel 718. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 285:116780. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comak, A., and Y. Altintas. 2017. Mechanics of turn-milling operations. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 121:2–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducobu, F., P.-J. Arrazola, E. Rivière-Lorphèvre, G. O. d Zarate, A. Madariaga, and E. Filippi. 2017. The CEL method as an alternative to the current modelling approaches for Ti6Al4V orthogonal cutting simulation. Procedia CIRP 58:245–50. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.188.
   Google Scholar
• Ducobu, F., E. Rivière-Lorphèvre, and E. Filippi. 2016. Application of the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method to the modeling of orthogonal cutting. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 59:58–66. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezugwu, E. O., J. Bonney, R. B. Da Silva, and O. Çakir. 2007. Surface integrity of finished turned Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools using conventional and high pressure coolant supplies. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47 (6):884–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, W. G., H. Lim, and M. Knezevic. 2021. A numerical study into element type and mesh resolution for crystal plasticity finite element modeling of explicit grain structures. Computational Mechanics 67 (1):33–55. doi:10.1007/s00466-020-01918-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., J. Hoon Ko, and H. P. Lee. 2018a. 3D coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element analysis of end milling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 98 (1–4):849–57. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., J. Hoon Ko, and H. P. Lee. 2018b. 3D Eulerian finite element modelling of end milling. Procedia CIRP 77:159–62. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.265.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K., M. Mia, G. Singh, D. Y. Pimenov, M. Sarikaya, and V. S. Sharma. 2019. Hybrid cooling-lubrication strategies to improve surface topography and tool wear in sustainable turning of Al 7075-T6 alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 101 (1–4):55–69. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2870-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K., Q. Song, Z. Liu, M. Sarikaya, M. Jamil, M. Mia, N. Khanna, and G. M. Krolczyk. 2021. Experimental characterisation of the performance of hybrid cryo-lubrication assisted turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Tribology International 153:106582. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatefi, S., and K. Abou-El-Hossein. 2020. Review of single-point diamond turning process in terms of ultra-precision optical surface roughness. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106 (5-6):2167–87. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-04700-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A., G. Xie, H. Zhang, and X. Wang. 2013. A comparative study on Johnson–Cook, modified Johnson–Cook and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the high temperature flow stress in 20CrMo alloy steel. Materials & Design (1980-2015) 52:677–85. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, C., Y. Li, X. Qin, Q. Zhao, D. Sun, and Y. Jin. 2015. 3D FEM simulation of helical milling hole process for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81 (9–12):1733–42. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7323-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, N., C. Agrawal, M. Dogra, and C. I. Pruncu. 2020. Evaluation of tool wear, energy consumption, and surface roughness during turning of inconel 718 using sustainable machining technique. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 9 (3):5794–804. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.104.
   Google Scholar
• Khochtali, H., I. BenBelgacem, F. Zemzemi, and W. Bensalem. 2021. Comparison of coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian and coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics–lagrangian in fluid–structure interaction applied to metal cutting. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 46 (12):11923–36. doi:10.1007/s13369-021-05737-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoei, A. R., and S. M. Taheri Mousavi. 2010. Modeling of large deformation–Large sliding contact via the penalty X-FEM technique. Computational Materials Science 48 (3):471–80. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshdarregi, M. R., and Y. Altintas. 2015. Generalized modeling of chip geometry and cutting forces in multi-point thread turning. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 98:21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazoglu, I., and Y. Altintas. 2002. Prediction of tool and chip temperature in continuous and interrupted machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 42 (9):1011–22. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00039-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z.-L., O. Tuysuz, L.-M. Zhu, and Y. Altintas. 2018. Surface form error prediction in five-axis flank milling of thin-walled parts. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 128:21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. C., and X.-M. Chen. 2010. A combined Johnson–Cook and Zerilli–Armstrong model for hot compressed typical high-strength alloy steel. Computational Materials Science 49 (3):628–33. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., and Y. Altintas. 1999. On-line monitoring of flank wear in turning with multilayered feed-forward neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 39 (12):1945–59. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00020-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-P., Z. Murat Kilic, and Y. Altintas. 2022. Monitoring of in-process force coefficients and tool wear. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 38:105–19. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Y. Zhang, M. Luo, and D. Zhang. 2019. Investigation of tool wear and chip morphology in dry trochoidal milling of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Materials 12 (12):1937. doi:10.3390/ma12121937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., D. Luo, X. Liao, Z. Zhang, Y. Huang, and J. Lu. 2021. Tool wear mechanism and prediction in milling TC18 titanium alloy using deep learning. Measurement 173:108554. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. C., G. C. Carlesso, L. N. López de Lacalle, M. T. Souza, F. de Oliveira Palheta, and C. Binder. 2022. Tool wear effect on surface integrity in AISI 1045 steel dry turning. Materials 15 (6):2031. doi:10.3390/ma15062031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, H., and H. Patil. 2022. Tribological performance based machinability investigations of Al2O3-ZrO2 ceramic cutting tool in dry machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Tribology International 176:107776. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh, S., L. Karunamoorthy, and K. Palanikumar. 2012. Measurement and analysis of surface roughness in turning of aerospace titanium alloy (gr5). Measurement 45 (5):1266–76. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J., J. Cai, J. Zhou, K. Shi, and X. Li. 2018. Inverse determination of improved constitutive equation for cutting titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V based on finite element analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97 (9-12):3671–82. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2178-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalaby, M. A., and S. C. Veldhuis. 2019. Wear and tribological performance of different ceramic tools in dry high speed machining of Ni-Co-Cr precipitation hardenable aerospace superalloy. Tribology Transactions 62 (1):62–77. doi:10.1080/10402004.2018.1486494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., J. S. Dureja, M. Dogra, M. K. Gupta, M. Mia, and Q. Song. 2020. Wear behavior of textured tools under graphene-assisted minimum quantity lubrication system in machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Tribology International 145:106183. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam, V., J. Sun, B. Yang, K. Liu, and R. Raju. 2018. Machining performance and tool wear analysis on cryogenic treated insert during end milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 36:188–96. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soori, M., B. Arezoo, and M. Habibi. 2013. Dimensional and geometrical errors of three-axis CNC milling machines in a virtual machining system. Computer-Aided Design 45 (11):1306–13. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soori, M., B. Arezoo, and M. Habibi. 2014. Virtual machining considering dimensional, geometrical and tool deflection errors in three-axis CNC milling machines. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 33 (4):498–507. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soori, M., B. Arezoo, and M. Habibi. 2016. Tool deflection error of three-axis computer numerical control milling machines, monitoring and minimizing by a virtual machining system. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 138 (8):081005. doi:10.1115/1.4032393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soori, M., B. Arezoo, and M. Habibi. 2017. Accuracy analysis of tool deflection error modelling in prediction of milled surfaces by a virtual machining system. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 55 (4):308–21. doi:10.1504/IJCAT.2017.086015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeyama, H., and R. Murata. 1963. Basic investigation of tool wear. Journal of Engineering for Industry 85 (1):33–7. doi:10.1115/1.3667575.
   Google Scholar
• Usca, Ü. A., M. Uzun, M. Kuntoğlu, E. Sap, and M. K. Gupta. 2021. Investigations on tool wear, surface roughness, cutting temperature, and chip formation in machining of Cu-B-CrC composites. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 116 (9–10):3011–25. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-07670-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, M., Ü. A. Usca, M. Kuntoğlu, and M. K. Gupta. 2022. Influence of tool path strategies on machining time, tool wear, and surface roughness during milling of AISI X210Cr12 steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 119 (3–4):2709–20. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-08365-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., B. Zou, J. Wang, Y. Wu, and C. Huang. 2020. Effect of the progressive tool wear on surface topography and chip formation in micro-milling of Ti–6Al–4V using Ti (C7N3)-based cermet micro-mill. Tribology International 141:105900. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.105900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., J. Outeiro, J. Zhang, B. Xu, W. Zhao, and V. Astakhov. 2021. Machining simulation of Ti6Al4V using coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach and a constitutive model considering the state of stress. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 110:102312. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., X. Deng, and Z. Li. 2019. Numerical modeling of dynamic frictional rolling contact with an explicit finite element method. Tribology International 129:214–31. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2018.08.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, Ç. V., T. Kıvak, M. Sarıkaya, and Ş. Şirin. 2020. Evaluation of tool wear, surface roughness/topography and chip morphology when machining of Ni-based alloy 625 under MQL, cryogenic cooling and CryoMQL. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 9 (2):2079–92. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.069.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., and Z. Liu. 2020. Influences of coating thickness on cutting temperature for dry hard turning Inconel 718 with PVD TiAlN coated carbide tools in initial tool wear stage. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 56:1155–65. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar