The Relationship Between Cyberchondria and Health Anxiety in Pregnant Women

References

• Akhtar, M., and T. Fatima. 2020. Exploring cyberchondria and worry about health among individuals with no diagnosed medical condition. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 70, no. 1: 90–5. doi:10.5455/JPMA.8682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Dahshan, A., V. Kehyayan, N. Al-Kubaisi, and N. Selim. 2023. Utilization of the internet for physical activity and diet information and its influence on pregnant women’s lifestyle habits in Qatar. Frontiers in Public Health 11: 1272109. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydemir, Ö., İ. Kirpinar, T. Sati, B. Uykur, and C. Cengisiz. 2013. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Health Anxiety Inventory. Noro Psikiyatri Arsivi 50, no. 4: 325–31. doi:10.4274/npa.y6383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajcar, B., and J. Babiak. 2021. Self-esteem and cyberchondria: The mediation effects of health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in a community sample. Current Psychology 40, no. 6: 2820–31. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00216-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barke, A., G. Bleichhardt, W. Rief, and B.K. Doering. 2016. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 23, no. 5: 595–605. doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9549-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelke, M., A.K. Martinsson, L. Lendahls, and M. Oscarsson. 2016. Using the Internet as a source of information during pregnancy – A descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden. Midwifery 40: 187–91. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calixte, R., A. Rivera, O. Oridota, W. Beauchamp, and M. Camacho-Rivera. 2020. Social and demographic patterns of health-related internet use among adults in the United States: A secondary data analysis of the health information national trends survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 18: 6856. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, S., M. Lastella, L. Vincze, C. Vandelanotte, and M. Hayman. 2020. A review of pregnancy information on nutrition, physical activity and sleep websites. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives 33, no. 1: 35–40. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çıtak Bilgin, N., H. Coşkun, D. Coşkuner Potur, E. İbar Aydın, and E. Uca. 2021. Psychosocial predictors of the fear of childbirth in Turkish pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 42, no. 2: 123–31. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2020.1734791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M. 2022. Health information-seeking internet behaviors among pregnant women: A narrative literature review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 42, no. 2: 194–208. doi:10.1080/02646838.2022.2088711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Y., E. Dağ, and S. Özpınar. 2024. The relationship of e-health literacy with cyberchondria: A cross-sectional study on pregnant women. Journal of Health Literacy 9, no. 1: 89–101. doi:10.22038/jhl.2024.76171.1501.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty-Torstrick, E.R., K.E. Walton, and B.A. Fallon. 2016. Cyberchondria: Parsing health anxiety from online behavior. Psychosomatics 57, no. 4: 390–400. doi:10.1016/j.psym.2016.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudonienė, V., and R. Kuisma. 2023. Women’s knowledge and perceptions of the effect of exercise during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 1822. doi:10.3390/ijerph20031822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis, L., and L. Roberts. 2020. Exploring the use and quality of Internet discussion forums in pregnancy: A qualitative analysis. Birth 47, no. 1: 153–61. doi:10.1111/birt.12459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat Statistics Explained. 2022. Glossary: Community survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Community_survey_on_ICT_usage_in_households_and_by_individuals (accessed January 15, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Evcili, F. 2019. A study on the relationship between internet use, anxiety levels, and quality of life of Turkish pregnant women. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 55, no. 3: 409–14. doi:10.1111/ppc.12326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., O.M. Shannon, T. Brown, M. Davison, C. Swann, A. Jones, L. Ells, and J. Matu. 2024. Associations between anxiety, depression, and weight status during and after pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity Reviews 25, no. 3: e13668. doi:10.1111/obr.13668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, S., L. Graves, M. Peer, L. Mamisashvili, G. Tomlinson, S.N. Vigod, C.L. Dennis, et al. 2018. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 79, no. 5: 17r12011. doi:10.4088/JCP.17r12011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, E.J.A., M.E. van Steijn, and M.G. van Pampus. 2019. Internet usage of women attempting pregnancy and pregnant women in the Netherlands. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 21: 9–14. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2019.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavlak, O., S.Ü. Atan, D. Güleç, R. Oztürk, and N. Atay. 2012. Pregnant women’s use of the internet in relation to their pregnancy in Izmir, Turkey. Informatics for Health & Social Care 37, no. 4: 253–263. doi:10.3109/17538157.2012.710686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazaal, Y., A. Chatton, L. Rochat, V. Hede, K. Viswasam, L. Penzenstadler, D. Berle, and V. Starcevic. 2021. Compulsive health-related internet use and cyberchondria. European Addiction Research 27, no. 1: 58–66. doi:10.1159/000510922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.Y. 2013. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 38, no. 1: 52–54. doi:10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kula Kartal, S., and E. Mor Dirlik. 2016. Historical development of the concept of validity and the most preferred technique of reliability. Cronbach Alpha Coefficient Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no. 4: 1865–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, D., S. Wilcox, C. Renee, C. Janke, N. Jarrett, A. Evangelopoulos, C. Serrano, et al. 2019. Cyberchondria: Implications of online behavior and health anxiety as determinants. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 7, no. 2: 154–62. doi:10.4103/amhs.amhs_108_19.
   Google Scholar
• Salkovskis, P.M., K.A. Rimes, H.M. Warwick, and D.M. Clark. 2002. The Health Anxiety Inventory: Development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychological Medicine 32, no. 5: 843–53. doi:10.1017/s0033291702005822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayakhot, P., and M. Carolan-Olah. 2016. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16, no. 1: 65. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0856-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K., J.R.E. Fox, and R.J. Brown. 2016. Health anxiety and Internet use: A thematic analysis. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 10, no. 2: 1–21. doi:10.5817/CP2016-2-4.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, A., H.T. Neufeld, and L. Forbes. 2020. A mixed-methods investigation of women’s experiences seeking pregnancy-related online nutrition information. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20, no. 1: 377. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03065-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šoštarić, M., N. Jokić-Begić, and M.V. Mijačika. 2024. Can’t stop, won’t stop – Understanding anxiety’s role in cyberchondria among pregnant women. Women & Health 64, no. 2: 185–94. doi:10.1080/03630242.2024.2308525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šoštarić, M., U. Mikac, and N. Jokić-Begić. 2023. Understanding cyberchondria in pregnant women: Longitudinal assessment of risk factors, triggers, and outcomes. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 44, no. 1: 2265050. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2023.2265050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcevic, V. 2017. Cyberchondria: Challenges of problematic online searches for health-related information. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 86, no. 3: 129–33. doi:10.1159/000465525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcevic, V., S. Baggio, D. Berle, Y. Khazaal, and K. Viswasam. 2019. Cyberchondria and its relationships with related constructs: A network analysis. The Psychiatric Quarterly 90, no. 3: 491–505. doi:10.1007/s11126-019-09640-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sümbüloğlu, K., and V. Sümbüloğlu, eds. 2017. Biostatistics. 17th ed. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S.S, and N. Goonawardene. 2017. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, no. 1: e9. doi:10.2196/jmir.5729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., T. Hartmann, and F. Te Poel. 2016. Online health anxiety and consultation satisfaction: A quantitative exploratory study on their relations. Patient Education and Counseling 99, no. 7: 1227–32. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taştekin Ouyaba, A., and S. İnfal Kesim. 2021. The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy: A systematic review. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 24, no. 2: 205–15. doi:10.1007/s00737-020-01065-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. 2022. Survey on Information and Communication Technology (ICT) usage in households. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=45587&dil=2 (accessed January 15, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Uguz, F., E. Yakut, S. Aydogan, M.G. Bayman, and K. Gezginc. 2019. Prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders during pregnancy: A case-control study with a large sample size. Psychiatry Research 272: 316–8. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, S.U., B. Akbay, C. Özdemir, and M. Zencir. 2017. The validity-reliability of the cyberchondria severity scale and its short form in university students. XIXth National Public Health Conference, Antalya, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• White, R.W., and E. Horvitz. 2009. Experiences with web search on medical concerns and self-diagnosis. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 4: 696–700.
   Google Scholar