Mergers, CEO Hubris, and Cost Stickiness

References

• Agrawal, A., J. F. Jaffe, and G. N. Mandelker. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance 47, no. 4: 1605–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, N., E. de Bodt, and R. Roll. 2007. Corporate Serial Acquisitions: An Empirical Test of the Learning Hypothesis. Working Paper, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Alba, J. W., and J. W. Hutchinson. 2000. Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research 27, no. 2: 123–56. doi:10.1086/jcr.2000.27.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., R. Banker, and S. Janakiraman. 2003. Are selling, general and administrative costs ‘sticky’? Journal of Accounting Research 41, no. 1: 47–63. doi:10.1111/joar.2003.41.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asquith, P., R. F. Bruner, and D. W. Mullins, Jr. 1983. The gains to bidding firms from merger. Journal of Financial Economics 11, no. 1–4: 121–39. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(83)90007-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala 2014. The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26, no. 2: 221–42.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H. K., and J. R. Nofsinger. 2010. Behavioral finance: Investors, corporations, and markets. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., and T. Gruca. 2008. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research 25, no. 4: 993–1006. doi:10.1506/car.25.4.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., E. Labro, and N. Soderstrom. 2014. Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26, no. 2: 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., M. Petersen, and N. Soderstrom. 2004. Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 19, no. 3: 283–99.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala. 2014. The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research In-press.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and D. Byzalov. 2014. Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26, no. 2: 43–79.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and L. Chen. 2006a. Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness. Accounting Review 81, no. 2: 285–307. doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and L. Chen. 2006b. Labor market characteristics and cross-country differences in cost stickiness. Working paper, Georgia State University. doi:10.2139/ssrn.921419
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., S. Fang, and M. Mehta. 2013. Cost behavior during the world economic crisis. Working paper, Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., and W. S. Hesterly. 2008. Strategic management and competitive advantages. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig. 1988. Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. San Diego, CA: Hardcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Ben, A. W., and P. Andre. 2006. Separation of ownership from control and acquiring firm performance: The case of family ownership in Canada. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 33, no. 3–4: 517–43. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00613.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David, I., J. R. Graham, and C. R. Harvey. 2007. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. NBER Working Paper No. 13711.
   Google Scholar
• Berkovitch, E., and M. P. Narayanan. 1993. Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, no. 3: 347–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, M. T., and Y. Qian. 2008. Are overconfident CEOs born or made? Evidence of self-attribution bias from frequent acquirers. Management Science 54, no. 6: 1037–51. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M., A. Desai, and E. H. Kim. 1988. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics 21, no. 1: 3–40. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(88)90030-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, R. F. 1999. An analysis of value destruction and recovery in the alliance and proposed merger of Volvo and Renault. Journal of Financial Economics 51, no. 1: 125–66. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00046-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, J., and A. M. Vijh. 2007. Incentive effects of stock and option holdings of target and acquirer CEOs. Journal of Finance 62, no. 4: 1891–933. doi:10.1111/jofi.2007.62.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. C., M. Gallmeyer, S. A. Johnson, J. Rutherford, and B. W. Stanley. 2011. CEO optimism and forced turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 101, no. 3: 695–712. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. X., T. Gores, and J. Nasev. 2013. Managerial overconfidence and cost stickiness. Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research 29, no. 1: 252–82. doi:10.1111/care.2012.29.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, W. Y., and J. H. Hwang. 2005. A study of operating performance improvement in corporate acquisitions since Korean financial crisis. Sogang Management Research 16–2: 389–412.
   Google Scholar
• Cordeiro, L. 2009. Managerial overconfidence and dividend policy. Working Paper, London Business School, London. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1343805
   Google Scholar
• Deaves, R., E. Lüders, and M. Schröder. 2010. The dynamics of overconfidence: Evidence from stock market forecasters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 75, no. 3: 402–12.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, M., and A. Shah. 2012. Testing hubris hypothesis of mergers and acquisition: Evidence from India. Business & Management Quarterly Review 3, no. 2: 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. Accounting Review 87, no. 4: 1219–46. doi:10.2308/accr-50153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, J. A., and D. Petmezas. 2007. Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias. European Financial Management 13, no. 3: 531–77. doi:10.1111/eufm.2007.13.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J., and R. Hogarth. 1978. Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review 85, no. 5: 395–416. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, S., and T. Odean. 2001. Learning to be overconfident. Review of Financial Studies 14, no. 1: 1–27. doi:10.1093/rfs/14.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. 2001. Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance 7, no. 2: 151–78. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00018-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, A. M., and A. V. Thakor. 2008. Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. Journal of Finance 63, no. 6: 2737–84. doi:10.1111/jofi.2008.63.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goergen, M., and L. Renneboog. 2004. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European Financial Management 10, no. 1: 9–45. doi:10.1111/eufm.2004.10.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gondhalekar, V., and Y. Bhagwat. 2003. Motives in the acquisitions of NASDAQ targets during the aftermath of the 1987 crash. Financial Review 38, no. 4: 553–69. doi:10.1111/fire.2003.38.issue-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, D. 2008. Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43, no. 4: 843–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastorf, A. H., D. J. Schneider, and J. Polefka. 1970. Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback. 1992. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics 31, no. 2: 135–75. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(92)90002-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietala, P., S. N. Kaplan, and D. T. Robinson. 2003. What is the price of hubris? Using takeover battles to infer overpayments and synergies. Financial Management 32, no. 3: 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilary, G., and L. Menzly. 2006. Does past success lead analysts to become overconfident? Management Science 52, no. 4: 489–500. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, D., A. Low, and S. H. Teoh. 2012. Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance 67, no. 4: 1457–98. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, T. 1983. Mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, a guide to their impact for investors and directors. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G., and D. Palia. 1999. A reexamination of the conglomerate merge wave in the 1960s: An internal capital market view. Journal of Finance 54, no. 3: 1131–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and R. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11, no. 1–4: 5–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kama, I., and D. Weiss. 2012. Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research 51, no. 1: 201–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren, G. 1991. Calibration and probability judgements; conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica 77, no. 3: 217–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewei, H., P. Olasson, and D. Robinson. 2000. Does takeover increase stockholder value? European Finance Association Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. K., and H. C. Kim. 2007. An empirical study on the post-merger performance and shareholder wealth of acquiring firm listed on KOSDAQ. Venture Business Research 10, no. 1: 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Klasa, S., and M. Stegemoller. 2007. Takeover activity as a response to time-varying changes in investment opportunity sets: Evidence from takeover sequences. Financial Management 36, no. 2: 19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koellinger, P., M. Minniti, and C. Schade. 2007. ‘I think I can, I think I can’: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 28, no. 4: 502–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., S. Lichtenstein, and B. Fischhoff. 1980. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, no. 2: 107–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. David. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, no. 6: 1121–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., and J. Roth. 1975. Heads i win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, no. 6: 951–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. K., and K. C. Han. 2005. Cost behavior and manager type. Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research 5, no. 2: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lewellen, W. G. 1971. A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate mergers. Journal of Finance 26, no. 2: 521–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., and B. Fischhoff. 1977. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 20, no. 2: 159–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., B. Fischhoff, and L. D. Phillips. 1982. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, 306–34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Y., and H. T. Lee. 2010. The bigger the better? Merger and acquisition performance of financial holding corporations: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 46, no. 1: 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. H., S. Y. Hu, and M. S. Chen. 2005. Managerial optimism and corporate investment: Some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Facific-Basin Finance Journal 13, no. 5: 523–46.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, S., and J. Switzer. 2001. Are cash acquisitions associated with better post combination operating performance than stock acquisitions? Journal of Banking and Finance 25, no. 6: 1113–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M., N. Srinivasan, and H. Merchant. 1997. Merger strategies and shareholder value during times of relaxed antitrust enforcement: The case of large mergers during the 1980s. Journal of Management 23, no. 1: 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatesta, P. 1983. The wealth effect of merger activity and the objective functions of merging firms. Journal of Financial Economics 11, no. 1–4: 155–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., and G. Tate. 2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance 60, no. 6: 2661–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., and G. Tate. 2008. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics 89, no. 1: 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., G. Tate, and J. Chen. 2011. Overconfidence and Early-Life Experiences: The Effect of Managerial Traits on Corporate Financial Policies. Journal of Finance 66, no. 5: 1687–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelker, G. 1974. Risk and return: The case of merging firms. Journal of Financial Economics 1, no. 4: 303–35.
   Google Scholar
• Maquiera, C., W. Megginson, and L. Nail. 1998. Wealth creation versus wealth redistributions in pure stock-for-stock mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 48, no. 1: 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., and M. Ross. 1975. Self-serving biases in attribute of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin 82, no. 2: 213–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, S., F. Schlingemann, and R. Stulz. 2005. Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. Journal of Finance 60, no. 2: 757–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., and P. J. Healy. 2008. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review 115, no. 2: 502–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreen, E. and N. Soderstrom. 1994. Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity?. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 255–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 65, no. 3: 3–59.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. G., and A. W. Stark. 2005. Does operating performance increase post-takeover for UK takeovers? A comparison of performance measures and benchmarks. Journal of Corporate Finance 11, no. 1–2: 293–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravencraft, D. J., and F. M. Scherer. 1989. The profitability of mergers. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, no. 1: 101–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, R. 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 59, no. 2: 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner, Z., and M. Weber. 2009. How do managers behave in stock option plans? Clinical evidence from exercise and survey data. Journal of Financial Research 32, no. 2: 123–55.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, A. 1990. Value creation in acquisition: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal 11, no. 2: 99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H. 2001. Behavioral corporate finance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14, no. 3: 113–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sirower, M. L. 1997. The synergy trap. How companies lose the acquisition game. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Soll, J. B., and J. Klayman. 2004. Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, no. 2: 299–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y. K., and S. L. Joo. 1997. A study on performance of the merger in Korea – Cashflow analysis. Journal of Korean Securities Association 20:71–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sudarsanam, S., and A. A. Mahate. 2003. Glamour acquirers, method of payment and post acquisition performance: The UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30, no. 1–2: 299–341.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, T. Y., S. Chou, and P. Andre. 2013. Operating performance of emerging market acquirers: Corporate governance issues. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 49, no. 3: 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. 1979. Sensation-seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar