Not Every Kind of Outward FDI Increases Parent Firm Performance: The Case of New EU Member States

References

• Abadie, A., and G. W. Imbens. 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74 (1):235–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and T. Mitton. 2009. Determinants of vertical integration: Financial development and contracting costs. The Journal of Finance 64 (3):1251–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerberg, D. A., K. Caves, and G. Frazer. 2006. Structural identification of production functions. MPRA Paper No. 38349.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S., D. Lee, S. Lee, and C. Woo. 2006. The economic impacts of outbound FDI and trade: The case of Korea. Mimeo. Sejong-si, Korea: Korea Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Altomonte, C., and A. Rungi. 2013. Business groups as hierarchies of firms: Determinants of vertical integration and performance. Nota di Lavoro 33. 2013. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sadig, A. J. 2013. Outward foreign direct investment and domestic investment: The case of developing countries. IMF Working Paper WP/13/52. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Andreff, W. 2002. The new multinational corporations from transition countries. Economic Systems 26 (4):371–79.
   Google Scholar
• Andreff, W. 2003. The newly emerging TNCs from economies in transition: A comparison with third world outward FDI. Transnational Corporations 12 (2):73–118.
   Google Scholar
• Antras, P., and E. Helpman. 2004. Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy 112 (3):552–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antras, P., and S. R. Yeaple. 2013. Multinational firms and the structure of international trade. In Handbook of International Economics, eds. G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff, 55–130. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. 2011. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics 10 (2):150–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aw, B.-Y., and A. R. Hwang. 1995. Productivity and the export market: A firm-level analysis. Journal of Development Economics 47 (2):313–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 2012. Global supply chains: Why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. CTEI Working Papers CTEI-2012–2013. Geneva: The Graduate Institute Geneva, Centre for Trade and Economic Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Balkarova, L. 2010. Outward FDI from the economies in transition: The determinants and policy implications. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Blomström, M., and A. Kokko. 1994. Home country effects of foreign direct investment: Evidence from Sweden. NBER Working Paper No. 4639. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1):115–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., J. Günther, S. S. Hassan, and B. Jindra. 2013. European integration and outward FDI from Central and Eastern Europe. MPRA Paper No. 51817. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., and P. E. Tolentino. 1990. Technological accumulation and third world multinationals. University of Reading Discussion Paper in International Investment and Business Studies No. 139. Reading, UK: University of Reading, Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-M., and S.-F. Yang. 2013. Impact of outward foreign direct investment on domestic R&D activity: Evidence from Taiwan’s multinational enterprises in low-wage countries. Asian Economic Journal 27 (1):17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. X., and M. O. Moore. 2010. Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. Journal of International Economics 80 (2):188–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.-J., and Y.-H. Ku. 2003. The effects of overseas investment on domestic employment. NBER Working Paper No. 10156. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-M., and S.-F. Yang. 2013. Impact of outward foreign direct investment on domestic R&D activity: Evidence from Taiwan’s multinational enterprises in low-wage countries. Asian Economic Journal 27 (1):17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirera, X, D. Lederman, J. A. Mañez, M. E. Rochina, and J. A. Sanchis. 2015. The export productivity link for Brazilian manufacturing firms. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 9 (22):1–31. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcos, G., D. M. Irac, G. Mion, and T. Verdier. 2013. The determinants of intrafirm trade: Evidence from French firms. Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (3): 825–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, A., C. Newman, J. Rand, and F. Tarp. 2014. Learning by exporting: The case for Mozambican manufacturing. Brookings Working Papers, Working paper No. 12. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., and S. Decramer. 2014. Productivity Gains from Outward FDI: Evidence from Slovenia. Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., and Č. Kostevc. 2006. Learning-by-exporting: Continuous productivity improvements or capacity utilization effects? Evidence from Slovenian firms. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 142 (3):599–614.
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., S. Polanec, and J. Prašnikar. 2007. Outward FDI and productivity: Micro-evidence from Slovenia. The World Economy 30 (1):135–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 1981a. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 1981b. Explaining the international direct investment position of countries towards a dynamic or developmental approach. Weltwirtschhes Archive 119 (1):30–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H., C. Kim, and D. Park. 2008. Old wine in new bottles: A comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developing country TNCs thirty years ago. In The Rise of Transnational Corporations from Emerging Markets: Threat or Opportunity? ed. K. Sauvant, 158–82. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H., and S. M. Lundan. 2008. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H., and R. Narula. 1996. Foreign Direct Investment and Governments, Catalysts for Economic Restructuring. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elia, S., I. Mariotti, and L. Piscitello. 2009. The impact of outward FDI on the home country’s labour demand and skill composition. International Business Review 18 (4):357–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fors, G., and A. Kokko. 2001. Home-country effects of FDI: Foreign production and structural change in home-country operations. In Topics in Empirical International Economics: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert E. Lipsey, ed. M. Blomstrőm and L. S. Goldberg, 137–60. NBER Books. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, T. C. 2013. Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Why Firms Fragment Production Across Locations. Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Fosfuri, A., and M. Motta. 1999. Multinationals without advantages. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (4):617–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazaniol, A. 2012. The impact of outward FDI on the domestic perimeter of manufacturing groups. Document de travail DT/2012-03. Paris: Universite Paris Dauphine, DIAL, IRD.
   Google Scholar
• Geishecker, I., and H. Görg. 2008. Winners and losers: a micro-level analysis of international outsourcing and wages. Canadian Journal of Economics 41 (1):243–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girma, S., H. Görg, and E. Strobl. 2004. Exports, international investment, and plant performance: Evidence from a non-parametric test. Economic Letters 83 (3):317–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedegebuure, R. V. 2006. The effects of outward foreign direct investment on domestic investment. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 3 (1):9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway, D., and R. Kneller. 2007. Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. Economic Journal 117 (517):F134–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z., and J. Mairesse. 1995. Production functions: The search for identification. NBER Working Paper No. 5067. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., E. Helpman, and A. Szeidl. 2006. Optimal integration strategies for multinational firms. Journal of International Economics 70 (1):216–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 2006. Trade, FDI and the organization of firms. Journal of Economic Literature 44 (3):589–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 2013. Foreign trade and investment: Firm-level perspectives. NBER Working Paper No. 19057. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., and P. R. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., M. J. Melitz, and S. R. Yeaple. 2004. Exports versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94 (1):300–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzer, D. 2011. The long-run relationship between outward FDI and total factor productivity: Evidence for developing countries. Journal of Development Studies 47 (5):767–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2014. Outward investment: Selected economic issues. Trade and Investment Analytical Paper: Topic 15 of 18. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hunya, G. 2015. WIIW FDI report 2015: Recovery in the NMS, Decline in the CIS. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Imbriani, C., R. Pittiglio, and F. Reganati. 2011. Outward foreign direct investment and domestic performance: The Italian manufacturing and services sectors. mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, L. 2012. Slicing the value chain internationally: Empirical evidence on the offshoring strategy by French firms. The World Economy 35 (11):1417–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, J., and J.-E. Vahlne. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, J., and F. Wiedersheim-Paul. 1975. The internationalisation of the firm – Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies 12 (3):305–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalotay, K. 2004. Outward FDI from Central and Eastern European countries. Economics of Planning 37 (2):141–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kayam, S. S. 2009. Home market determinants of FDI outflows from developing and transition countries. MPRA Paper No. 16781. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Klimek, A. 2009. The Determinants of Outward Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Poland. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University of Economics, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, W. K., and M. Smolka. 2009. Global sourcing decisions and firm productivity: evidence from Spain. CESIFO Working Paper No. 2903. Munich: CESIFO Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kokko, A. 2006. The home country effects of FDI in developed economies. EIJS Working Paper Series No. 225. Stockholm: European Institute of Japanese Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1983. The “New Theories” of international trade and the multinational enterprises. In The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, ed. C. P. Kindleberger and D. B. Audretsch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, S. 1996. Transnationals from developing countries impact on home economies. Background paper for the FIAS High Level Roundtable on the Outward Foreign Direct Investment from the Newly Industrialized Economies in Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, December 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. 2010. The destination of outward FDI and the performance of South Korean multinationals. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 46 (3):59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies 70 (2):317–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, R. E. 2002. Home and host country effects of FDI. NBER Working Paper No. 9293. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., and R. L. Tung. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4):481–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masca, S. G., and V. L. Vaidean. 2010. Outward FDI and the investment development path in Romania. Romanian Journal of Economics 31 (2):49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Masso, J., U. Varblane, and P. Vahter. 2007. The impact of outward FDI on home-country employment in a low-cost transition economy. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 873. Ann Arbor, MI: William Davidson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, T., and G. I. P. Ottaviano. 2007. The happy few: The internationalisation of European firms. Brussels: Bruegel Blueprint Series, Volume III.
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, M. J. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6):1695–1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H.-C., and T. W. Roehl. 2001. Unconventional foreign direct investment and the imbalance theory. International Business Review 10 (2):197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Navaretti, G. B., and D. Castellani. 2004. Investments abroad and performance at home: Evidence from Italian multinationals. CEPR Discussion Papers 4284. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, N., and D. Trefler. 2008. The boundaries of the multinational firm: An empirical analysis. In The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, ed. E. Helpman, D. Marin, and T. Verdier, 55–83. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olley, G. S., and A. Pakes. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications industry. Econometrica 64 (6):1263–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., and B. Rubin. 1985. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 39 (1):33–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 2001. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the Tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 2:169–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sakura, K., and T. Kondo. 2014. Outward FDI and domestic job creation in the service sector. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series No. 14-E-3. Tokyo: Bank of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Shiau, H.-L., C.-J. Huang, and F.-C. Chen. 2013. International involvement, target market selection, and consolidate performance: A firm-level analysis of Taiwan’s FDI in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 49 (Supplement 4):184–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa Andres, M., P. Nunnenkamp, and M. Busse. 2012. What drives FDI from non-traditional sources? A comparative analysis of the determinants of Bilateral FDI flows. Keil Working Papers No. 1755.
   Google Scholar
• Sunesen, E. R., S. T. Jespersen, and M. H. Thelle. 2010. Impacts of EU outward FDI. Final Report, Copenhagen Economics, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Svetličič, M., and C. Bellak. 2001. Investment development path of small transition countries: Conceptual background and empirical evidence. Paper presented at CEFOS International Multidisciplinary Conference on Small Countries in World Markets, Göteborg, Sweden, September 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Svetličič, M., and A. Jaklič. 2003. Enhanced Transition Through Outward Internationalization: Outward FDI by Slovenian Firms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tomiura, E. 2007. Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics 72 (1):113–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report 2006: FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vahter, P., and J. Masso. 2006. Home versus host country effects of FDI: Searching for new evidence of productivity spillovers. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 820. Ann Arbor, MI: William Davidson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yeaple, S. R. 2009. Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics 78 (2):206–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeaple, S. R. 2003. The complex integration strategies of multinational firms and cross-country dependencies in the structure of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics 60 (2):293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., L. Ling, and Z. Ting. 2010. The contribution of outward direct investment to productivity changes within China, 1991–2007. Journal of International Management 16 (2):121–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2009. On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters 104 (3):112–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar