212
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sustainable Energy Policy in China: Economic Issues and Policy Challenges

Does FDI Increase Industrial Energy Consumption of China? Based on the Empirical Analysis of Chinese Provinces Industrial Panel Data

&

References

  • Antweiler, W., B. R. Copeland, and M. S. Taylor. 2001. Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review 91 (4):877–908.
  • Baumol, W., and W. Oates. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chen, Y., and H. Wang. 2010. Effect of FDI on regional industrial energy efficiency. Contemporary Finance 30 (7):99–106.
  • Co, C. Y., J. A. List, and L. D. Qui. 2004. Intellectual property rights, environmental regulations, and foreign direct investment. Land Economics 80 (2):153–73.
  • Copeland, B. R., and M. S. Taylor. 1997. The trade-induced degradation hypothesis. Resource and Energy Economics 19 (4):321–44.
  • Dean, J., M. E. Lovely, and H. Wang. 2009. Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics 90 (1):1–13.
  • Dua, A., and D. C. Esty. 1997. Sustaining the Asia Pacific Miracle: Environmental protection and economic integration. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Eskeland, G. S., and A. E. Harrison. 2003. Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics 70 (1):1–23.
  • Fredriksson, P. G., and P. Eliste. 2004. Does trade liberalization cause a race to the bottom in environmental policies? A spatial econometric analysis. Ch. 18. In Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools, and applications, ed. L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, and S. J. Rey, Berlin: Springer.
  • Geng, Q., C. Sun, and D. Fu. 2010. The empirical analysis of the FDI’s choice of district under different environment supervision. South China Journal of Economics 28 (6):39–50.
  • Jie, H. 2006. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics 60 (1):228–45.
  • Letchumanan, R., and F. Kodama. 2000. Reconciling the conflict between the ‘Pollution-Haven’ hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Research Policy 29 (1):59–79.
  • Li, X., and X. Lu. 2010. International trade, pollution industry transfer and Chinese industries’ CO2 emissions. Economic Research Journal 45 (1):15–26.
  • List, J., W. McHone, and D. Millimet. 2004. Effects of environmental regulation on foreign and domestic plant births: Is there a home field advantage? Journal of Urban Economics 56 (2):303–26.
  • Lu, Y. 2009. Does environmental regulation affect the comparative advantage in pollution intensive goods trade? Economic Research 44 (4):28–40.
  • Mongelli, I., G. Tassielli, and B. Notarnicola. 2006. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy-carbon embodiments: An input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy 34 (1):88–100.
  • Sheng, B., and Y. Lu. 2012. Effect of foreign direct investment on the China environment – An Empirical Study from industrial panel data. China Social Science 33 (5):54–75.
  • Song, D., and Y. Yi. 2011. Foreign direct investment and China carbon emission. Chinese Population, Resources and Environment 21 (1):49–52.
  • Xu, H., and Y. Deng. 2012. Does foreign direct investment cause environment pollution in China? Management World 27 (2):30–43.
  • Zhang, J., G. Wu, and J. Jiang. 2004. Estimation Chinese provincial capital stock:1952–2000. Economic Research 39 (10):35–44.
  • Zhang, X., and Y. Zhou. 2007. Spatial effect analysis of FDI to China’s energy intensity. Quantitative and Technical Economic Research (1):101–08.
  • Zhao, X. 2003. Environmental protection and international competitiveness of industry. Beijing: Chinese Social Science Press.
  • Zhu, P., Z. Zhang, and G. Jiang. 2011. FDI and environmental regulation: An empirical study based on the perspective of decentralization. Economic Research 46 (6):133–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.