Spatial Spillovers of Regional Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Provinces

References

• Acs, Z. J., L. Anselin, and A. Varga. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 (7):1069–85. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. 310–30. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42 (3):422–48. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4:2713–39. doi:10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X.
   Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S. 2007. The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography 83 (2):181–99. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00342.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review 47 (4):687–710. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2007. The international dynamics of R&D and innovation in the long run and in the short run. The Economic Journal 117 (518):486–511. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02027.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruche, G. 2009. A new geography of innovation–China and India rising. Transnational Corporations Review 1 (4):24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrer-Borras, B., and G. Serrano-Domingo. 2007. Innovation and R&D spillover effects in Spanish regions: A spatial approach. Research Policy 36 (9):1357–71. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A., S. Chatterjee, and R. M. Hunt. 2007. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics 61 (3):389–419. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlot, S., and G. Duranton. 2004. Communication externalities in cities. Journal of Urban Economics 56 (3):581–613. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2004.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlot, S., and G. Duranton. 2006. Cities and workplace communication: Some quantitative French evidence. Urban Studies 43 (8):1365–94. doi: 10.1080/00420980600776459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K., and L. Ping. 2004. Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review 15 (1):25–44. doi:10.1016/S1043-951X(03)00027-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun-Chien, K., and Y. Chih-Hai. 2008. Knowledge capital and spillover on regional economic growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review 19 (4):594–604. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2008.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A., and R. E. Hall. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86 (1):54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2002. Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1):133–45. doi:10.1023/A:1013160923450.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., A. Rodríguez-Pose, and M. Storper. 2007. The territorial dynamics of innovation: A Europe–United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (6):673–709. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., A. Rodríguez-Pose, and M. Storper. 2012. The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (5):1055–85. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman, C. 2010. Innovation strategies of three of the BRICS: Brazil, India and China-what can we learn from three different approaches. The Rise of Technological Power in the South. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Debarsy, N. 2012. The Mundlak approach in the spatial Durbin panel data model. Spatial Economic Analysis 7 (1):109–31. doi:10.1080/17421772.2011.647059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and D. Puga. 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4:2063–117. doi:10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. 2010. Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5 (1):9–28. doi:10.1080/17421770903541772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., and A. And Rodríguez-Pose. 2011. Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies 19 (4):555–74. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 2002. Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy 31 (2):191–211. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X. 2008. Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from China. Oxford Development Studies 36 (1):89–110. doi:10.1080/13600810701848193.
   Google Scholar
• Funke, M., and A. Niebuhr. 2005. Regional geographic research and development spillovers and economic growth: Evidence from west Germany. Regional Studies 39 (1):143–53. doi:10.1080/0034340052000321904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J. L., and R. Hayes. 2004. Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy 33 (9):1329–54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J. L., M. E. Porter, and S. Stern. 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 31 (6):899–933. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. R., and P. Mccann. 2005. Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography 5 (5):523–43. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbh072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., S. Redding, and J. Van Reenen. 2004. Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4):883–95. doi:10.1162/0034653043125194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., and J. V. Reenen. 2006. How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on UK firms as a test of technology sourcing. American Economic Review 96 (5):1859–75. doi:10.1257/000282806779396265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value’. American Economic Review 76 (5):984–1001. doi:10.2307/1816464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, S. S. 1997. Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica : Journal of the Econometric Society 65 (6):1389–419. doi:10.2307/2171741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckiki, A., and M. Tsuji. 2010. From Agglomeration to Innovation: Upgrading industrial clusters in emerging economies – Edited by Akifumi Kuckiki and Masatsugu Tsuji. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 24 (2):178–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8411.2010.01267_6.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2013. Innovation and spatial inequality in Europe and USA. Journal of Economic Geography 13 (1):1–22. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2014. Innovation in creative cities: Evidence from British small firms. Industry and Innovation 21 (6):494–512. doi:10.1080/13662716.2014.983748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and T. Buck. 2007. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy 36 (3):355–66. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Bazo, E., E. Vayá, and M. Artís. 2004. Regional externalities and growth: Evidence from European regions. Journal of Regional Science 44 (1):43–73. doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2004.00327.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., T. E. Uberti, and M. Nosvelli. 2014. Does intentional mean hierarchical? Knowledge flows and innovative performance of European regions. Annals of Regional Science 53 (2):453–85. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0618-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. 1981. Product cycles, innovation cycles, and regional economic change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 19 (4):291–306. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(81).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. A. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37 (1/2):17–23. doi:10.2307/2332142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naz, A., A. Niebuhr, and J. C. Peters. 2015. What’s behind the disparities in firm innovation rates across regions? Evidence on composition and context effects. The Annals of Regional Science 55 (1):131–56. doi:10.1007/s00168-015-0694-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, R. K., and J. P. LeSage. 2009. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Park, I. K., and G. Kim. 2016. Innovation of ICT manufacturing and agglomeration economies: Evolution over the life cycle. In Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea, eds. E. Kim and B. H. S. Kim, 69–87. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., F. V. Oort, and K. Frenken. 2009. Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 10 (2):231–55. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and R. Crescenzi. 2006. R&D, spillovers, innovation systems and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Bruges European Economic Research Papers 42 (1):51–67. doi:10.1080/00343400701654186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleuwaegen, L., and P. Boiardi. 2014. Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy 43 (9):1508–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, M. J., M. A. Abreu, and H. L. Groot. 2015. Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities. Papers in Regional Science 94 (2):249–72. doi:10.1111/pirs.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, H. M., M. D. Partridge, and A. Faggian. 2013. Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science 53 (5):778–812. doi:10.1111/jors.12019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and A. J. Venables. 2004. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography 4 (4):351–70. doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. 2000. Spatial distribution of patents in China. Regional Studies 34 (5):441–54. doi:10.1080/00343400050058693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, A. 2000. Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science 40 (2):289–309. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., D. Wan, and Y. Sun. 2014. Technology spillovers of foreign direct investment in coastal regions of east China: A perspective on technology absorptive capacity. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 50 (s1):96–106. doi:10.2753/REE1540-496X5001S106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., and H. Lin. 2012. Openness, absorptive capacity, and regional innovation in China. Environment and Planning A 44 (2):333–55. doi:10.1068/a44182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. 1989. Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2):369–405. doi:10.2307/2937942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh, L. 2009. Patent laws and innovation in China. International Review of Law and Economics 29 (4):304–13. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., F. Li, S. Song, and Y. Yu. 2013. Central government’s infrastructure investment across Chinese regions: A dynamic spatial panel data approach. China Economic Review 27:264–76. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2012.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar