Audit Pricing of Shared Leadership

References

• Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22:17–32. doi:10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M. P., S. P. Ferris, and E. Unlu. 2011. It takes two: The incidence and effectiveness of co-CEOs. The Financial Review 46:385–412. doi:10.1111/fire.2011.46.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, G. S., S. U. K. Choi, and J. H. W. A. Rho. 2016. Audit hours and unit audit price of industry specialist auditors: Evidence from Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research 33 (1):314–40. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, J., and K. Johnstone. 2004. Earnings management risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decision. The Accounting Review 79:277–304. doi:10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T., W. Landsman, and D. Shackelford. 2001. Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 39:35–43. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., and A. Schoar. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:1169–208. doi:10.1162/003355303322552775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, M. A. 2011. Does CEO duality constrain board independence? Some evidence from audit pricing. Accounting and Finance 51:361–80. doi:10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L. 2007. The CEO within: Why inside outsiders are the key to succession. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19:365–84. doi:10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and Z. Ye. 2011. Corporate Governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30:1–31. doi:10.2308/ajpt-10112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and D. Hanno. 2000. Auditors’ consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19:133–46. doi:10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2002. Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research 19:573–94. doi:10.1506/983M-EPXG-4Y0R-J9YK.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J., N. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Finance Economics 87:329–56. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., A. Gregory, and A. Committee. 1996. Effectiveness and the audit fee. European Accounting Review 5:177–98. doi:10.1080/09638189600000012.
   Google Scholar
• De George, E. T., C. B. Ferguson, and N. A. Spear. 2013. How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review 88:429–62. doi:10.2308/accr-50317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13:1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x.
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., and J. Jimbalvo. 1993. Factors related to auditor-client disagreements over income-increasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research 9:415–43. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00889.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88:288–307. doi:10.1086/260866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. K., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2):301–25. doi:10.1086/467037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return and equilibrium—empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81:607–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann, D. A., W. J. Read, and M. J. Abdolmohammadi. 2009. Financial restatements, audit fees, and the moderating effect of CFO turnover. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28:205–23. doi:10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., and J. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 16:135–65. doi:10.1111/care.1999.16.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, S. C. 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks and blockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 27:355–87. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(90)90060-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. A., D. H. Lont, Y. Sun, and C. Governance. 2008. Audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 4:18–49. doi:10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70028-X.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F., C. Chen, J. Tsui, and D. A. Accruals. 2003. Managers’ incentives and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20:441–64. doi:10.1506/686E-NF2J-73X6-G540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., Ed. 2002. Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, T. 2007. The cost of being public in the era of Sarbanes-Oxley. West Palm Beach, FL: Foley & Lardner LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D., W. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of the supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Research 23:141–91. doi:10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hribar, P., T. Kravet, and R. Wilson. 2014. A new measure of accounting quality. Review of Accounting Studies 19:506–38. doi:10.1007/s11142-013-9253-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29:193–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E., E. Lazear, and P. Pressure. 1992. Partnerships. Journal of Political Economy 100:801–17. doi:10.1086/261840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., M. B. Muttakin, and J. Siddiqui. 2015. Audit fees, auditor choice and stakeholder influence: Evidence from a family-firm dominated economy. The British Accounting Review 47:304–20. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-B., X. Liu, and L. Zheng. 2012. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review 87:2061–94. doi:10.2308/accr-50223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. Y., Y. D. Lim, and R. Simnett. 2010. Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality: Evidence from the Korean audit market. Working paper Seoul, Korea: Korea University.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., J. Francis, and Z. Wang. 2012. Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review 87:589–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNichols, M. F. 2002. Discussion of “The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors”. The Accounting Review 77:61–69. doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1989. Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J., J. Galbraith, and E. E. Lawler III. 2002. When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review 44:65–83. doi:10.2307/41166143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P., G. Marwell, and R. Teixeira. 1985. A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3):522–56. doi:10.1086/228313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., and J. A. Conger. 2003. Shared leadership: Reframing the how’s and why’s of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlman, W. A. 1990. Why same people shouldn’t serve on public boards. Harvard Business Review 68:28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia-Atmajaa, L., J. Hamanb, and G. Tanewskib. 2011. The role of board independence in mitigating agency problem II in Australian family firms. The British Accounting Review 43:230–46. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, J. E., Q. T. Swanquist, and R. L. Whited. 2017. Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review 92:213–44. doi:10.2308/accr-51449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18:161–90. doi:10.2307/2490397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, J., B. Jaggi., F. A. Gul, C. E. O. Domination, D. Accruals, and A. Fees. 2001. Journal of Accounting. Auditing and Finance 16:189–207. doi:10.1177/0148558X0101600303.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., and L. Rosenkopf. 1996. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the US cement industry. Management Science 42:939–53. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.7.939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., and C. O’Reilly. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior 20:77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40:185–212. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. 2007. Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review 39:290–302. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2007.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zmijewski, M. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Supplement):59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar