Do Female Board Directors Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? An Empirical Study Based on the Critical Mass Theory

References

• Adams, R. B., and D. Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Social Science Electronic Publishing 94 (2):291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., and K. Bremser. 2014. Strategic management decisions in power positions to achieve business excellence in small service businesses: Does gender matter? New York: Social Science Electronic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aspen Institute. 2008. Where will they lead? MBA student attitudes about business and society. The Aspen Institute Center for Business Education. http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/bsp/SAS_PRINT_FINAL.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Bear, S., N. Rahman, and C. Post. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):207–21. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., S. Bosco, and K. Vassill. 2006. Does female representation on boards of directors associate with Fortune’s 100 Best companies to work for list? Business and Society 45 (2):235–48. doi:10.1177/0007650305283332.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., and V. H. Threadgill. 2010. Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies 15 (2):15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, S. C., and Y. J. Ugras. 1992. The ethical attitudes of students as a function of age, sex and experience. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):961–79. doi:10.1007/BF00871962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulouta, I. 2013. Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (2):185–97. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocirlan, C., and C. Pettersson. 2012. Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of fortune 500 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19 (1):47–62. doi:10.1002/csr.v19.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in east asian corporations. Social Science Electronic Publishing 58 (1–2):81–112.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, B. S., and J. Wang. 1998. Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1595–603. doi:10.1023/A:1005748230228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro, J. J., and J. Sarkis. 2008. Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment 17 (5):304–17. doi:10.1002/bse.v17:5.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, S. S., L. B. Ferreri, and L. D. Parker. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 12 (2):111–22. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. 2006. The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics and Gender 2 (4):511–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, B., and G. Ladegard. 2012. Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management and Governance 16 (4):595–615. doi:10.1007/s10997-010-9165-y.
   Google Scholar
• Hafsi, T., and G. Turgut. 2013. Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):463–79. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handajani, L., B. Subroto, T. Sutrisno, and E. Saraswati. 2014. Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence, 535–40. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. L., and M. C. Cheng. 2012. What prompts small and medium enterprises to engage in corporate social responsibility? a study from taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19 (5):288–305. doi:10.1002/csr.276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M., A. Grethe Solberg, and A. Broadbridge. 2006. Gender related boardroom dynamics: How women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review 21 (2):113–30. doi:10.1108/09649420610650693.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, N. A., and J. P. Angelidis. 1995. The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):405–10. doi:10.1007/BF00872102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, N. A., D. P. Howard, and J. P. Angelidis. 2003. Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):393–401. doi:10.1023/A:1027334524775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joecks, J., K. Pull, and K. Vetter. 2013. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass?’. Social Science Electronic Publishing 118 (1):61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening. 1994. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5):564–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kahreh, M. S., S. M. Mirmehdi, and A. Eram. 2013. Investigating the critical success factors of corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from the Iranian banking sector. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society 13 (2):184–97. doi:10.1108/14720701311316661.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5):965–90. doi:10.1086/226425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., V. Kramer, and S. Erkut. 2008. Critical mass: Theimpact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics 37 (2):145–64. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kytle, B., and J. Ruggie. 2005. Corporate social responsibility as risk management. Management of Environmental Quality an International Journal 20 (20):311–20.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, L., T. Lin, and Y. Zhang. 2018. Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance: Evidence from china. Journal of Business Ethics 150 (1):211–25. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3176-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, L. S., and L. Thorne. 2005. Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from canada. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3):241–53. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-5367-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4):370–96. doi:10.1037/h0054346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, C., N. Rahman, and E. Rubow. 2011. Green governance: Boardsof Directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 50 (1):189–223. doi:10.1177/0007650310394642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., I. Gallego-Alvarez, and I. M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2010. Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16 (2):94–107. doi:10.1002/csr.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., J. M. Beyer, and C. Kruytbosch. 1980. Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (2):200–25. doi:10.2307/2392452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C. 2007. Does female board representation influence firm performance? the danish evidence. Corporate Governance An International Review 15 (2):404–13. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. M., E. Gedajlovic, and C. Erdener. 2003. The chinese family firm as a multinational enterprise. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 11 (2):105–22. doi:10.1108/eb028965.
   Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., A. Calabrò, M. Huse, and M. Brogi. 2011. Critical mass theory and women directors’ contribution to board strategic tasks. Ssrn Electronic Journal 6 (3). doi: 10.2139/ssrn1861447.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J. 2003. Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):1–10. doi:10.1023/A:1021626024014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and W. Stanton. 1988. The implications of board of directors’ composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management 5:229–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. Q., H. Zhu, and H. Ding. 2013. Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post sarbanes-oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):381–92. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1352-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar