Factors Influencing Cambodian Rice Exports: An Application of the Dynamic Panel Gravity Model

References

• Amemiya, T. 1980. Selection of regressors. International Economic Review 21 (2):331–54. doi:10.2307/2526185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review 69 (1):106–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., and E. Wincoop. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1):170–92. doi:10.1257/000282803321455214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, A., and J. Weinblatt. 1998. Linder’s hypothesis revisited: Income similarity effects for low income countries. Applied Economics Letters 5 (10):607–11. doi:10.1080/135048598354267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asuyama, Y., D. Chhun, T. Fukunishi, S. Neou, and T. Yamagata. 2013. Firm dynamics in the Cambodian garment industry: Firm turnover, productivity growth and wage profile under trade liberalization. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 18 (1):51–70. doi:10.1080/13547860.2012.742671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atif, R. M., L. Haiyun, and H. Mahmood. 2016. Pakistan’s agricultural exports, determinants and its potential: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 26 (3):257–76. doi:10.1080/09638199.2016.1243724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. 2005. Econometric analysis of panel data. 3rd ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., P. Egger, and M. Pfaffermary. 2015. Panel data gravity models of international trade. In The Oxford handbook of panel data, ed. B. H. Baltagi, 608–41. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., P. Egger, and M. Pfaffermayr. 2013. A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects. Econometric Reviews 32 (5–6):650–85. doi:10.1080/07474938.2012.742342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., P. H. Egger, and M. Kesina. 2018. Generalized spatial autocorrelation in a panel-probit model with an application to exporting in China. Empirical Economics 55 (1):193–211. doi:10.1007/s00181-017-1409-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera, A. K., and C. M. Jarque. 1982. Model specification tests: A simultaneous approach. Journal of Econometrics 20 (1):59–82. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(82)90103-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3):474–81. doi:10.2307/1925976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. 1989. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1):143–53. doi:10.2307/1928061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. 1990. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Economic Journal 100 (403):1216–29. doi:10.2307/2233969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerema, A., A. Peeters, S. Swolfs, F. Vandevenne, S. Jacobs, J. Staes, and P. Meire. 2016. Soybean trade: Balancing environmental and socio-economic impacts of an intercontinental market. PLoS One 11 (5):e0155222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, T. H. H., and Q. Chen. 2017. An analysis of factors influencing rice export in Vietnam based on gravity model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8 (3):830–44. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0279-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buongiorno, J. 2016. Gravity models of forest products trade: Applications to forecasting and policy analysis. Forestry 89:117–26. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpw005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrère, C. 2006. Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review 50 (2):223–47. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. B., and H. E. Goemans. 2018. International trade and coordination: Tracing border effects. World Politics 70 (1):1–52. doi:10.1017/S0043887117000284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. S., E. C. Villanueva, and M. C. García-Cortijo. 2016. The international wine trade and its new export dynamics (1988–2012): A gravity model approach. Agribusiness 32 (4):466–81. doi:10.1002/agr.21463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, T. 2008. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review 98 (4):1707–21. doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, T. 2018. The gravity equation in international trade: An explanation. Journal of Political Economy 126 (1):150–77. doi:10.1086/694292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., and S. Saghaian. 2016. Market integration and price transmission in the world rice export markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 41 (3):444–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. A. 2018. The development of Cambodia–China relation and its transition under the OBOR Initiative. The Chinese Economy 51 (4):370–82. doi:10.1080/10971475.2018.1457317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhuor, S. 2017. Potential roles of export orientation of Cambodia’s agriculture and agro-industry: An application of CGE analysis. Journal of Economic Structures 6 (1):1–33. doi:10.1186/s40008-017-0087-6.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, C. 2002. Linder hypothesis revisited. Applied Economics Letters 9 (9):601–05. doi:10.1080/13504850110111234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, P., M. Kellman, and Y. Shachmurove. 1999. Linder hypothesis in Pacific NIC trade, 1965–1990. Applied Economics 31:175–82. doi:10.1080/000368499324408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosslett, T. L., and P. D. Cosslett. 2018. Sustainable development of rice and water resources in mainland Southeast Asia and Mekong river basin. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Bianco, A., V. L. Boatto, F. Caracciolo, and F. G. Santeramo. 2016. Tariffs and non-tariff frictions in the world wine trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics 43 (1):31–57. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascal, D., K. Mattas, and V. Tzouvelekas. 2002. An analysis of EU wine trade: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research 8 (2):135–47. doi:10.1007/bf02295344.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. V. 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In The regionalization of the world economy, ed. J. A. Frankel, 7–32. 1st ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delano, D. L., and J. D. Knottnerus. 2018. The Khmer Rouge, ritual and control. Asian Journal of Social Science 46:79–110. doi:10.1163/15685314-04601005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., and S. S. Kortum. 1997. Technology and bilateral trade. Cambridge, MA. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=226011.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, P. 2002. An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy 25 (2):297–312. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B., and D. A. Irwin. 1998. The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In The regionalization of the world economy, ed. J. A. Frankel, 33–62. 1st ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evenett, S. J., and W. Keller. 2002. On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy 110 (2):281–316. doi:10.1086/338746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z., R. Zhang, X. Liu, and L. Pan. 2016. China’s outward FDI efficiency along the Belt and Road: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model. China Agricultural Economic Review 8 (3):455–79. doi:10.1108/CAER-11-2015-0158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2018. FAOSTAT online database 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Accessed February 5, 2018. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.
   Google Scholar
• Filippini, C., and V. Molini. 2003. The determinants of East Asian trade flows: A gravity equation approach. Journal of Asian Economics 14 (5):695–711. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gashi, P., M. Hisarciklilar, and G. Pugh. 2016. Kosovo–EU trade relations: A dynamic panel poisson approach. Applied Economics 49 (27):2642–54. doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1245836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazalian, P. L., L. D. Tamini, B. Larue, and J.-P. Gervais. 2012. A gravity model to account for vertical linkages between markets with an application to the cattle/beef sector. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 21 (4):579–601. doi:10.1080/09638199.2010.505297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, J. A., and C. L. Williams. 2000a. Export-led growth: A survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 1. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 9 (4):261–337. doi:10.1080/09638190050086177.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, J. A., and C. L. Williams. 2000b. Export-led growth: A survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 2. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 9 (4):445–70. doi:10.1080/096381900750056867.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, P. V., H. T. M. Nguyen, T. Kompas, T. N. Che, and B. Trinh. 2015. Rice production, trade and the poor: Regional effects of rice export policy on households in Vietnam. Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (2):280–307. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarlund, C., and A. Andersson. 2019. What’s in it for Africa? European Union fishing access agreements and fishery exports from developing countries. World Development 113:172–85. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, Z. U., K. Meilke, and J. Cranfield. 2013. Selection bias in a gravity model of agrifood trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40 (2):331–60. doi:10.1093/erae/jbs028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasiner, E., and X. Yu. 2019. When institutions matter: A gravity model for Chinese meat imports. International Journal of Emerging Markets 14 (1):231–53. doi:10.1108/ijoem-11-2016-0290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., and T. Mayer. 2014. Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of international economics, ed. G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff, Vol. 4, 131–95. AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1):153–61. doi:10.2307/1912352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 1987. Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese andInternational Economies 1:62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2):441–87. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., and P. R. Krugman. 1985. Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H., and J. Menon. 2013. Cambodia: Rapid growth with weak institutions. Asian Economic Policy Review 8 (1):46–65. doi:10.1111/aepr.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., and J. Menon. 2014. Cambodia: Rapid growth in an open, post-conflict economy. The World Economy 37 (12):1649–68. doi:10.1111/twec.12206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, T. X., C. S. Pham, and M. A. Ulubaşoğlu. 2016. The role of rice in poverty dynamics in rural Vietnam: 2002–2008. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 21 (1):132–50. doi:10.1080/13547860.2015.1068600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, I. R. 2014. Foreign entry, quality, and cultural distance: Product-level evidence from US movie exports. Review of World Economics 150 (2):371–92. doi:10.1007/s10290-013-0180-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F., X. K. Zhang, M. M. Hu, and D. L. Cook. 2019. Chinese enterprises’ investment in infrastructure construction in Cambodia. Asian Perspective 43 (1):177–207. doi:10.1353/apr.2019.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot, N., and M. Kakinaka. 2007. Trade structure and trade flows in Cambodia: A gravity model. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 24 (3):305–19. doi:10.1353/ase.2008.0008/10.1355/ae24-3b.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. W., and S. S. Lim. 2017. Effect of non-tariff measures on international tea trades. Journal of Korea Trade 21 (4):309–23. doi:10.1108/JKT-05-2017-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Q. Xin, and H. Arshad. 2018. Competitiveness of Pakistani rice in international market and export potential with global world: A panel gravity approach. Cogent Economics & Finance 6 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/23322039.2018.1486690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Q. Xin, S. Shahriar, and F. Ali. 2018a. South Korea’s potential export flow: A panel gravity approach. Asian Journal of Empirical Research 8 (4):124–39. doi:10.18488/journal.1007/2018.8.4/1007.4.124.139.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Q. Xin, S. Shahriar, and H. Arshad. 2018b. A panel data analysis of China’s trade pattern with OPEC members: Gravity model approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review 8 (1):103–16. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.81.103.116.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, S., and J. Yoo. 2018. A study on the changes of agricultural import structure according to implementation of FTAs in South Korea. Journal of Korea Trade 22 (1):2–16. doi:10.1108/JKT-01-2018-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, B. F., and J. W. Mellor. 1961. The role of agriculture in economic development. American Economic Review 51 (4):566–93. doi:10.2307/2229883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahouli, B. 2016. Regional integration agreements, trade flows and economic crisis: A static and dynamic gravity model. International Economic Journal 30 (4):450–75. doi:10.1080/10168737.2016.1204338.
   Google Scholar
• Kahouli, B., and A. Omri. 2017. Foreign direct investment, foreign trade and environment: New evidence from simultaneous-equation system of gravity models. Research in International Business and Finance 42:353–64. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W., and J. H. Pyun. 2018. North Korea’s economic integration and growth potential. Asian Economic Journal 32 (3):301–25. doi:10.1111/asej.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and M. Tcha. 2005. Pass-through elasticity, substitution and market share: The case for sheep meat exports. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 14 (2):209–28. doi:10.1080/09638190500093380.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Z. Sun, and X. Long. 2019. An empirical analysis of night-time light data based on the gravity model. Applied Economics 51 (8):797–814. doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1523612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, D., and M. Lo. 2017. Economic impacts of cultural institutes. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 64:12–21. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2017.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. B. 1961. An essay on trade and transformation. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Linnemann, H. 1966. An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lundmark, R. 2018. Analysis and projection of global iron ore trade: A panel data gravity model approach. Mineral Economics 31 (1):191–202. doi:10.1007/s13563-017-0125-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariyono, J. 2014. Rice production in Indonesia: Policy and performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 36 (2):123–34. doi:10.1080/23276665.2014.911489.
   Google Scholar
• Marti, L., R. Puertas, and L. García. 2014. Relevance of trade facilitation in emerging countries’ exports. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 23 (2):202–22. doi:10.1080/09638199.2012.698639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzoso, I., and F. Johannsen. 2017. The gravity of arms. Defence and Peace Economics 30 (1):2–26. doi:10.1080/10242694.2017.1324722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzoso, I., N.-L. D. Felicitas, and N. Horsewood. 2009. Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 20 (1):46–65. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyas, L. (Ed.). 2017. The econometrics of multi-dimensional panels: Theory and applications. Series Vol. 50. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mátyás, L. 1998. The gravity model: Some econometric considerations. The World Economy 21 (3):397–401. doi:10.1111/twec.1998.21.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M. A., M. R. Redfearn, and M. A. Tieslau. 2000. A re-examination of the Linder hypothesis: A random-effects tobit approach. International Economic Journal 14 (3):123–36. doi:10.1080/10168730000000032.
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, J. 2008. Language and foreign trade. European Economic Review 52 (4):667–99. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miankhel, A. K., K. Kalirajan, and S. M. Thangavelu. 2014. Australia’s export potential: An exploratory analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 19 (2):230–46. doi:10.1080/13547860.2013.820472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, S., and T. T. Nguyen. 2016. Does the trade gravity model depend on trading partners? Some evidence from Vietnam and her 54 trading partners. International Review of Economics & Finance 41:220–37. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2015.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale, F., A. Borrello, and A. Motova. 2015. Analysis of the determinants of international seafood trade using a gravity model. Marine Policy 60:98–106. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, H. J. (Ed.). 1997. Rice production in Cambodia. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B. X. 2010. The determinants of Vietnamese export flows: Static and dynamic panel gravity approaches. International Journal of Economics and Finance 2 (4):122–29. doi:10.5539/ijef.v2n4p122.
   Google Scholar
• Niimi, Y., P. Vasudeva-Dutta, and L. A. Winters. 2004. Storm in a rice bowl: Rice reform and poverty in Vietnam in the 1990s. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 9 (2):170–90. doi:10.1080/1354786042000207326.
   Google Scholar
• Olivero, M. P., and Y. V. Yotov. 2012. Dynamic gravity: Endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics 45 (1):64–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2015. Time series and panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, L., and E. Rasoulinezhad. 2016. Have sanctions modified Iran’s trade policy? An evidence of Asianization and De-Europeanization through the gravity model. Economies 4 (4):24. doi:10.3390/economies4040024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto, G. G. 2006. Using survey data to assess the distributional effects of trade policy. Journal of International Economics 70 (1):140–60. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, P. 1963. A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90:93–100. doi:10.2307/40436776.
   Google Scholar
• Pulliainen, K. 1963. A world trade study: An econometric model of the pattern of the commodity flows in international trade in 1948–1960. Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift 16:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, R., S. Shahriar, and S. Kea. 2019. Determinants of exports: A gravity model analysis of the Bangladeshi textile and clothing industries. FIIB Business Review 8 (3):229–44. doi:10.1177/2319714519872643.
   Google Scholar
• Rasoulinezhad, E., and G. S. Kang. 2016. A panel data analysis of South Korea’s trade with OPEC member countries: The gravity model approach. Iranian Economic Review 20 (2):203–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rasoulinezhad, E., and L. Popova. 2017. An estimation of the impact of economic sanctions and oil price shocks on Iran-Russian trade: Evidence from a gravity-VEC approach. Iranian Economic Review 21 (3):469–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rasoulinezhad, E., and W. Wei. 2017. China’s trade with OPEC member countries: A panel-gravity model approach. The Chinese Economy 50:339–55. doi:10.1080/10971475.2017.1345272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RGC. 2010. Policy document on the promotion of paddy rice production and export of milled rice. Phnom Penh: The Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC), approved by the Council of Ministers on July 25th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4):641–58. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2010. On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in poisson regression. Economics Letters 107 (2):310–12. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2011. Further simulation evidence on the performance of the poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters 112 (2):220–22. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareth, V. 2015. The study on rice trade between Cambodia and the Greater Mekong subregion: China, Thailand and Vietnam. Ph.D Dissertation. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Dissertation, China.
   Google Scholar
• Schierhorn, F., P. Meyfroidt, T. Kastner, T. Kuemmerle, A. V. Prishchepov, and D. Müller. 2016. The dynamics of beef trade between Brazil and Russia and their environmental implications. Global Food Security 11:84–92. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Semykina, A., and J. M. Wooldridge. 2013. Estimation of dynamic panel data models with sample selection. Journal of Applied Econometrics 28 (1):47–61. doi:10.1002/jae.1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahriar, S. 2019a. Literature survey on the “Belt and Road” initiative: A bibliometric analysis. In Foreign business in China and opportunities for technological innovation and sustainable economics, ed. V. Anna, L. Miltiadis, Z. Xi, and Z. Jie, 79–115. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, S. 2019b. Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: The institutional economics approach. Beau Bassin, Mauritius: Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, S., L. Qian, and S. Kea. 2018. China’s economic integration with the Greater Mekong sub-region: An empirical analysis by a panel dynamic gravity model. Economics Discussion Paper 44:1–45. Accessed April 28, 2018. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2018-44/file.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, S., L. Qian, and S. Kea. 2019. Determinants of exports in China’s meat industry: A gravity model analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (11):2544–65. doi:10.1080/1540496x.2019.1578647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahriar, S., L. Qian, S. Kea, and N. M. Abdullahi. 2019. The gravity model of trade: A theoretical perspective. Review of Innovative and Competitiveness: A Journal of Economic and Social Research 5 (1):21–42. doi:10.32728/ric.2019.51/2.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, B. 2016. The gravity model of international trade: A user guide (An updated version). Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Economic and Social Commissions for Asia and the Pacific.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, B. 2019. Mega-regional trade agreements and Asia: An application of structural gravity to goods, services, and value chains. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 51:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H. W., and E. Thorbecke. 1971. The role of agriculture in economic development. Economic Journal 81 (323):673–76. doi:10.2307/2229883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, T. 2010. Does international trade cause economic growth? A survey. The World Economy 33:1517–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soeng, R., and L. Cuyvers. 2018. Domestic institutions and export performance: Evidence for Cambodia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 27 (4):389–408. doi:10.1080/09638199.2017.1386230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamini, L. D., M. Doyon, and R. Simon. 2016. Analyzing trade liberalization effects in the egg sector using a dynamic gravity model. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (2):383–411. doi:10.1111/cjag.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuong, N. T. T. 2018. The effect of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on Vietnam’s rice exports. EconomiA 19 (2):251–65. doi:10.1016/j.econ.2017.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the world economy. The International Executive 5 (1):27–30. doi:10.1002/tie.5060050113.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., R. Korm, and K. Veara. 2017. Government policy and private sector development in post-conflict states: Growing Cambodia’s rice production and export industries. Economic and Labour Relations Review 28 (2):252–69. doi:10.1177/1035304617705269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNcomtrade. 2018. UN comtrade database, the international trade statistics database of the United Nations. The United Nations (UN). Accessed April 28, 2018. https://comtrade.un.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2016. Analysis of the factors influencing Japan’s soybean import trade: Based on gravity model. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 6 (2):109–16. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2016.62011.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G.-X., J.-K. Huang, and J. Yang. 2012. Honey safety standards and its impacts on China’s honey export. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 11 (4):684–93. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(12)60056-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., and B. Tadesse. 2008. Immigrants, cultural distance and U.S. state-level exports of cultural products. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 19 (3):331–48. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2008.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 1st ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, B., and S. Chen. 2014. Estimating gravity equation models in the presence of sample selection and heteroscedasticity. Applied Economics 46 (24):2993–3003. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.920481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiwei, W. 2016. The belt and road initiative: What will China offer the world in its rise. Beijing, China: New World Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yotov, Y. V., R. Piermartini, J.-A. Monteiro, and M. Larch. 2016. An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations; The World Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., L. Li, and L. Lei. 2018. Avian influenza, non-tariff measures and the poultry exports of China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 63 (1):72–94. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar