Innovation in Business Groups: Evidence from China

References

• Aghion, P., S. Bond, A. Klemm, and I. Marinescu. 2004. Technology and financial structure: Are innovative firms different? Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2–3):277–88. doi:10.1162/154247604323067989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, H. V., and D. Wolfenzon. 2006. A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. The Journal of Finance 61 (6):2637–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bena, J., and H. Ortiz-Molina. 2013. Pyramidal ownership and the creation of new firms. Journal of Financial Economics 108 (3):798–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneito, P., P. Coscollá‐Girona, M. E. Rochina‐Barrachina, and A. Sanchis. 2015. Competitive pressure and innovation at the firm level. The Journal of Industrial Economics 63 (3):422–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., I. Kim, and X. Tian. 2017. Do unions affect innovation?. Management Science, 63 (7):2251–2271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. R., and B. C. Petersen. 2011. Cash holdings and R&D smoothing. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (3):694–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., H. Liang, and X. Zhan. 2019. Peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Management Science 65 (12):5487–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. E., and B. C. Petersen. 2002. Is growth of small firms constrained by internal finance?. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2):298–309.
   Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T., and X. Tian. 2018. Anti-takeover provisions, innovation, and firm value: A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 53 (3):1163–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T. J., E. Loutskina, and X. Tian. 2014. Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Review of Financial Studies 27:2434–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., and H. Ma. 2017. Peer effects in decision-making: Evidence from corporate investment. China Journal of Accounting Research 2 (10):167–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Y., X. Tian, and W. Wang. 2019. Corporate innovation along the supply chain. Management Science 65 (6):2445–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornaggia, J., Y. Mao, X. Tian, and B. Wolfe. 2015. Does banking competition affect innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 115:189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, H., and Z. Lu. 2014. Enterprise group, large shareholders’ supervision and over-investment (in Chinese). Management World 7:134–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dougal, C., C. A. Parsons, and S. Titman. 2015. Urban vibrancy and corporate growth. The Journal of Finance 70 (1):163–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J. X., J. Pittman, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhao. 2017. Auditor choice and its implications for group-affiliated firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 34 (1):39–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, V. W., X. Tian, and S. Tice. 2014. Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? The Journal of Finance 69 (5):2085–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, T., and L. Fresard. 2014. Learning from peers’ stock prices and corporate investment. Journal of Financial Economics 111 (3):554–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, R. H., D. S. Scharfstein, and J. C. Stein. 1994. Internal versus external capital markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:1211–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, R., V. Nanda, and A. Seru. 2007. Affiliated firms and financial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics 86 (3):759–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., and X. Tian. 2018. Finance and corporate innovation: A survey. Asia? Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 47 (2):165–212.
   Google Scholar
• He, J. J., and X. Tian. 2013. The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 109 (3):856–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G., G. Phillips, and N. Prabhala. 2014. Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. The Journal of Finance 69 (1):293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes Jr, R. M., R. E. Hoskisson, H. Kim, W. P. Wan, and T. R. Holcomb. 2018. International strategy and business groups: A review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business 53 (2):134–150.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (2):225–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, G., L. Charles, and H. Yue, 2010. Tunneling through Inter-corporate Loans: The China Experience. Journal of Financial Economics 98:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaustia, M., and V. Rantala. 2015. Social learning and corporate peer effects. Journal of Financial Economics 117 (3):653–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and J. W. Rivkin. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22 (1): 45–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and Y. Yafeh. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. The Journal of Business 78 (1):301–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küllü, A. M., D. Dyer, G. Yilmaz, and Z. Sharma.. 2019. The impact of business group affiliation on stock price informativeness: Evidence from an emerging market. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 28 (2):187–212.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. T., and M. R. Roberts. 2014. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy. The Journal of Finance 69 (1):139–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and S. Asaba. 2006. Why do firms imitate each other?. Academy of Management Review 31 (2):366–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., and H. Zhang. 2010. The arrangement of ownership, the space in rent-seeking and the cash distribution (in Chinese). Management World 5:150–58.
   Google Scholar
• Manso, G. 2011. Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance 66 (5):1823–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H., and M. Yu. 2010. Business group, bank lending and capital allocation efficiency. Journal of Financial Research (In Chinese) 2010 (10):83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, L., W. Ocasio, and T. H. Kim. 2019. Performance feedback in hierarchical business groups: The cross-level effects of cognitive accessibility on R&D search behavior. Organization Science 30 (1): 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfstein, D. S., and J. C. Stein. 2000. The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. The Journal of Finance 55 (6):2537–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., and Z. Liu. 2006. Are the capital markets of the internal capital of the “level- by- level- holding companies” are efficient? A study based hongyi’s series of corporations (In Chinese). Management World 6:114–22.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D., C. Pattnaik, A. S. Gaur, and E. Ketencioglu. 2019. Corporate expansion during pro-market reforms in emerging markets: The contingent value of group affiliation and diversification. Journal of Business Research 82:220–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics 312–320.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. C. (1997). Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. The Journal of Finance 52 (1): 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, T. W., W. He, Z. L. He, and J. Lu. 2014. Patent regime shift and firm innovation: Evidence from the second amendment to China’s patent law. Academy of Management 1:14174.
   Google Scholar
• Vives, X. 2008. Innovation and competitive pressure. The Journal of Industrial Economics 56 (3):419–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and J. Zhao. 2015. Hedge funds and corporate innovation. Financial Management 44 (2):353–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalabik, B., and R. J. Fairchild. 2011. Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. International Journal of Production Economics 131 (2):519–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar