How State Ownership Affects Firm Innovation Performance: Evidence from China

References

• Aghion, P., U. Akcigit, A. Bergeaud, R. Blundell, and D. Hemous. 2019. Innovation and top income inequality. The Review of Economic Studies 86 (1):1–45. doi:10.1093/restud/rdy027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., P. Howitt, and S. Prantl. 2015. Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation. Journal of Economic Growth 20 (3):223–62. doi:10.1007/s10887-015-9114-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcigit, U., and Q. Liu. 2016. The role of information in innovation and competition. Journal of European Economic Association 14 (4):828–70. doi:10.1111/jeea.12153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., and A. R. Vining. 1989. Ownership and performance in competitive environment: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. The Journal of Law & Economics 32 (1):1–33. doi:10.1086/467167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and J. Edler. 2020. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy 49 (5):103971. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., and R. W. Vishny. 1996. A theory of privatization. Economic Journal 106 (435):309–19. doi:10.2307/2235248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, L., C. Hsieh, and X. Zhu. 2008. Growth and structural transformation in China, in China’s great economic transformation. In China’s great economic transformation, chapter, eds. L. Brandt and T. Rawski, Vol. 17, 683–728. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton, G. D., M. W. Peng, D. Ahlstrom, C. Stan, and K. Xu. 2015. State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (1):92–114. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, G. D., and D. Ahlstrom. 2003. An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the west. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2):233–59. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00079-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P., J. Clegg, and C. Wang. 2002. The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies 33 (4):637–55. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukari, C., and E. A. A. Anaman. 2020. Corruption and firm innovation: A grease or sand in the wheels of commerce? Evidence from lower-middle and upper-middle income economies. Eurasian Business Review 11 (2):267–302. doi:10.1007/s40821-020-00164-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Micro econometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., R. R. Zhai, C. Wang, and C. Zhong. 2015. Home institutions, internationalization and firm performance: Evidence from listed chinese firms. Management Decision 53 (1):160–78. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2014-0311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2003. The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review 45 (3):33–58. doi:10.2307/41166175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. Research, innovation, and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (7):115–58. doi:10.1080/10438599800000031.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, L., and F. Jiang. 2012. State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies 43 (3):264–84. doi:10.1057/jibs.2012.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnirzki, D., P. Hannel, and J. M. Rosa. 2011. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy 40 (2):217–29. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, J., and K. Motohashi. 2015. Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review 35:137–55. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewenter, K. L., and P. H. Malatesta. 2001. State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. The American Economic Review 91 (1):320–34. doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, H., A. Li, and Y. Luo. 2021. Innovation in business groups: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57 (9):2503–13. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2020.1859365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., A. B. Winslow, R. M. J. Bohmer, and G. P. Pisano. 2003. Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences 34 (2):197–224. doi:10.1111/1540-5915.02316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L., J. Lerner, and C. Wu. 2017. Intellectual property rights protection, ownership, and innovation: Evidence from China. The Review of Financial Studies 30 (7):2446–77. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhx023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, G., X. Wang, and Z. Zhu. 2011. China marketization index. Economic Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, P., X. Wan, and M. Lu. 2012. China’s regional inequality in innovation capability, 1995–2006. China & World Economy 23 (3):16–36. doi:10.1111/j.1749-124X.2012.01285.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, R., R. Weng, and J. Pan. 2021. How property rights affect firm’s labor investment efficiency? Evidence from a property law enactment in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade (2):381–97. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.1987215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, M., O. M. Rui, and W. Wu. 2011. The effects of political connections and state ownership on corporate litigation in China. The Journal of Law & Economics 54 (3):573–607. doi:10.1086/659261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., and D. Harhoff. 2012. Recent research on the economics of patents. Annual Review of Economics 4 (4):541–65. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111008.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. 2010. Measuring the returns to R&D. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmersson, M., and M. Johanson. 2016. Speed of SME internationalization and performance. Management International Review 56 (1):67–94. doi:10.1007/s11575-015-0257-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., D. Ahlstrom, M. T. Dacin, E. Levitas, and L. Svobodina. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies, China vs. Russia. Organization Science 15 (2):173–85. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., C. Wang, and M. Kafouros. 2015. The role of the state in explaining the internationalization of emerging market enterprises. British Journal of Management 26 (1):45–62. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, P., X. Tian, and Y. Xu. 2014. Financial development and innovation: cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 112 (1):116–35. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafouros, M., C. Wang, P. Piperopoulos, and M. Zhang. 2015. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy 44 (3):803–17. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75 (4):41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khwaja, A. I., and A. Mian. 2005. Do lenders favor political connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4):1371–411. doi:10.1162/003355305775097524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., H. Kim, and P. M. Lee. 2008. Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science 19 (3):404–18. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos, K., A. Papalexandris, M. Papachroni, and G. Ioannou. 2011. Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research 64 (12):1335–43. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, S. G., and A. Musacchino. 2018. State ownership reinvented? Explaining performance differences between state-owned and private firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 26 (4):255–72. doi:10.1111/corg.12239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., W. Mbanyele, and J. Sun. 2022. Managerial R&D hands-on experience, state ownership, and corporate innovation. China Economic Review 72:101766. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., and C. Rosell. 2013. Import competition, multi-product firms, and basic innovation. Jjournal of International Economics 91 (2):220–34. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and X. Shi. 2012. Corporate governance reform and state ownership: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 41 (6):665–85. doi:10.1111/ajfs.12001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and J. Yao. 2006. Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (4):485–503. doi:10.1007/s10490-006-9017-0.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, S., and J. Pearce. 2009. The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 21 (3):285–302. doi:10.1080/08985620802279999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (1):1–27. doi:10.2307/2393531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemlioglu, I., and S. K. Mallick. 2017. Do managerial practices matter in innovation and firm performance relations? new evidence from the UK. European Financial Management 23 (5):1016–61. doi:10.1111/eufm.12123.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., R. Garde Sánchez, and A. M. López Hernández. 2015. Managers as drivers of CSR in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (5):777–801. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.892478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P., K. Mellahi, and E. Thun. 2010. The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (7):1161–82. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Q., W. H. S. Tong, and J. Tong. 2002. How does government ownership affect firm performance? evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29 (1–2):1–27. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00422.
   Google Scholar
• Susana, B., and J. Edler. 2020. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy 49 (5):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tihanyi, L., R. V. Aguilera, P. Heugens, M. van Essen, S. Sauerwald, P. Duran, and R. Turturea. 2019. State ownership and polical connection. Journal of Management 45 (6):2293–321. doi:10.1177/0149206318822113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, F., and H. Barkema. 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 23 (7):637–53. doi:10.1002/smj.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., J. Hong, M. Kafouros, and M. Wright. 2012. Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies 43 (7):655–76. doi:10.1057/jibs.2012.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., M. Kafouros, J. Yi, J. Hong, and P. Ganotakis. 2020. The role of government affiliation in explaining firm innovativeness and profitability in emerging countries: Evidence from China. Journal of World Business 55 (3):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., D. Kong, and J. Zhang. 2021. Does the political promotion of local officials impede corporate innovation? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57 (4):1159–81. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2019.1613223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., D. Sutherland, L. Ning, Y. Wang, and X. Pan. 2018. Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in China’s large-scale private sector firms. Technovation 69:40–53. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., I. Filatotchev, R. E. Hoskisson, and M. W. Peng. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies 42 (1):1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., J. Hong, W. C. Hsu, and C. Wang. 2017. The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation 62-63:4–13. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., C. Wang, and M. Kafourod. 2013. The effects of innovative capabilities on exporting: Do institutional forces matter?. International Business Review 22 (2):392–406. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., M. Yu, and G. Chen. 2020. Does mixed-ownership reform improve SOEs’ innovation? Evidence from state ownership. China Economic Review 61:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. 2014. Role of institutional quality in determining the R&D investment of chinese firms. China & World Economy 22 (4):60–82. doi:10.1111/j.1749-124X.2014.12075.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K., G. Gao, and H. Zhao. 2017. State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (2):375–404. doi:10.1177/0001839216674457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., and F. Wu. 2010. Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic strategic Management Journal 31 (5):547–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar