Determinants of Households’ Intention to Take Out or Convert to a Trust-Type Home Pension: Evidence from South Korea

References

• Agresti, A. 2013. An introduction to categorical data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Caplin, A. 2000. Inertia in the U.S. housing finance market: Cases and causes. Paper prepared for the Joint AEA/AREUEA Session, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Caplin, A. 2001. The reverse mortgage market: Problems and prospects. In Innovations in housing finance for the elderly, ed. O. Mitchell, 234–53. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. 2016. Reverse mortgage participation in the United States: Evidence from a national study. International Journal of Financial Studies 4 (1):5. doi:10.3390/ijfs4010005.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K., S. Noh, and I. Baek. 2022. Does home equity liquidation reduce older adults’ poverty rate? Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 30 (1):59–76. doi:10.1332/175982721X16385307728468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, K. L., N. W. S. Chow, and I. Chi. 2006. Willingness to consider applying for reverse mortgage in Hong Kong Chinese middle-aged homeowners. Habitat International 30:716–27. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, T., P. Gerhard, and T. Post. 2017. Reverse mortgages: What homeowners (don’t) know and how it matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 133:151–71. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Mortgage Federation. 2009. Hypostat 2008. Brussels: European Mortgage Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, J. H., O. S. Mitchell, and B. S. K. Koh. 2021. Asset-rich and cash-poor: Which older adults value reverse mortgages? Ageing & Society 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0144686X21001045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibler, K., and J. Rabianski. 1993. Elderly interest in home equity conversion. Housing Policy Debate 4 (4):565–88. doi:10.1080/10511482.1993.9521145.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, L., W. Fan, and E. M. Washing. 2016. Modeling severity of single vehicle run-off-road crashes in rural areas: Model comparison and selection. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 43 (6):493–503. doi:10.1139/cjce-2015-0449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, J., and S. Lee. 2018. Population aging and the possibility of a middle-income trap in Asia. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54 (6):1225–38. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2018.1429263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haukka, A., A. M. Heikkinen, J. H. Haukka, and M. Kaila. 2020. Oral health indices predict individualised recall interval. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 6 (6):585–95. doi:10.1002/cre2.319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaack, P., M. Margaret, and F. Stewart. 2020. Reverse mortgages, financial Inclusion, and economic development: Potential benefit and risks. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9134.
   Google Scholar
• Kutty, N. K. 1998. The scope for poverty alleviation among elderly home-owners in the United States through reverse mortgages. Urban Studies 35 (1):113–29. doi:10.1080/0042098985104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviton, R. 2002. Reverse mortgage decision-making. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 13 (4):1–16. doi:10.1300/J031v13n04_01.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and W. Fan. 2019. Pedestrian injury severities in pedestrian-vehicle crashes and the partial proportional odds logit model: Accounting for age difference. Transportation Research Record 2673 (5):731–46. doi:10.1177/0361198119842828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, D. 2018. Hacking reverse mortgages. MIT Golub Center for Finance and Policy working paper. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, S. R., F. Meryl, and K. K. Nandinee. 1994. Potential beneficiaries from reverse mortgage products for elderly homeowners: An analysis of American housing survey data. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 22 (2):257–99. doi:10.1111/1540-6229.00635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2021. 2020 Residential Status Survey Results. Press Release, August 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. A., I. F. Megbolugbe, and D. W. Rasmussen. 1996. Reverse mortgage and the economic status of elderly women. The Gerontologist 26 (3):400–05. doi:10.1093/geront/36.3.400.
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., C. Loibl, and D. Haurin. 2017. Reverse mortgage motivations and outcomes: Insights from survey data. Cityscape 19 (1):73–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima, M. 2012. Everything you always wanted to know about reverse mortgages but were afraid to ask. Business Review Q1:19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima, M., and I. A. Telyukova. 2017. Reverse mortgage loans: A quantitative analysis. The Journal of Finance 72 (2):911–50. doi:10.1111/jofi.12489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Pensions at a glance 2021: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/ca401ebd-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, R. 2008. Unlocking housing equity through reverse mortgages: The case of elderly homeowners in Australia. European Journal of Housing Policy 8 (1):61–79. doi:10.1080/14616710701817166.
   Google Scholar
• Pour, A. T., S. Moridpour, R. Tay, and A. Rajabifard. 2016. A partial proportional odds model for pedestrian crashes at mid-blocks in Melbourne metropolitan area. MATEC Web Conferences, Lucerne, Switzerland 81:02020.
   Google Scholar
• Pour-Rouholamin, M., and M. Jalayer. 2016. Analyzing the severity of motorcycle crashes in North Carolina using highway safety information systems data. ITE Journal 86 (10):45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfoot, D. L., K. Scholen, and S. K. Brown. 2007. Reverse mortgages: Niche product or mainstream solution? Report on the 2006 AARP National Survey of Reverse Mortgage Shoppers. Report #2007-22, AARP, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L., and W. Fan. 2020. Combined latent class and partial proportional odds model approach to exploring the heterogeneities in truck-involved severities at cross and T-intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention 144:105638. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. 2019. Population projection: 2017-2067. Deajeon: Statistics Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. 2022. Population trend survey. Deajeon: Statistics Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Venti, S. F., and D. A. Wise. 2004. Aging and housing equity: Another look. In Perspectives on the economics of aging, ed. D. A. Wise, 127–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whait, R. B., B. Lowies, P. Rossini, S. McGreal, and B. Dimovski. 2019. The reverse mortgage conundrum: Perspectives of older households in Australia. Habitat international 94:102073. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2008. Please release me! A review of the equity release market in the UK, its potential and consumer expectations. London: Council of Mortgage Lenders Research.
   Google Scholar