Research on the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Sustainable Performance: A Multi-dimensional Balance Perspective

References

• Ackerman, R. W. 1973. How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review 51:88–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, A. M., and T. Shavit. 2008. How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in CSR?’. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):899–905. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9600-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. B., and A. M. Bonnefous. 2011. Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (2):124–40. doi:10.1002/bse.681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi, S., M. Caporin, and F. Fontini. 2018. A multidimensional analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firms’ economic performance. Ecological Economics 147:218–29. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnie, B., C. X. Cao, and C. Chen. 2018. Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance 52:73–95. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., and A. Millington. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29 (12):1325–43. doi:10.1002/smj.714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucker, K. D., C. Macharis, and A. Verbeke. 2013. Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research 224 (1):122–31. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4):497–505. doi:10.2307/257850.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. 2020. Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications 168:114186. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., A. Feldmann, and O. Tang. 2015. The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics 170:445–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2 (3):70–76. doi:10.2307/41166246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, B., L. Ji, and Z. Liu. 2021. The effect of strategic corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58 (6):1726–39. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.1925245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, V. 2011. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review 86 (6):1969–94. doi:10.2308/accr-10130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, F., D. H. Erkens, S. M. Young, and G. Tang. 2018. How adopting new performance measures affects subjective performance evaluations: Evidence from EVA adoption by Chinese state-owned enterprises. The Accounting Review 93 (1):161–85. doi:10.2308/accr-51763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Oxford,UK: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Fauzi, H., G. Svensson, and A. A. Rahman. 2010. “Triple bottom line” as “sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability 2 (5):1345–60. doi:10.3390/su2051345.
   Google Scholar
• Foo, C., L. Teck, and Yuanhui. 2015. A sociological theory of corporate finance societal responsibility and cost of equity in China. Chinese management studies 9 (3):269–94. doi:10.1108/CMS-12-2014-0232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Management Studies 29:131–54.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galant, A. C., and Simon. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Ekonomska Istraivanja 30:676–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang, C., C. Lu, and P. Yuan. 2009. “The relation of entrepreneurs’ social responsibility orientation with the social and organizational performances of the corporate.” In International Conference on Management and Service Science. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., R. Khodaverdi, and A. Jafarian. 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 47:345–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque, N., A. Rahman, R. I. Molla, A. Noman, and M. Bhuiyan. 2018. Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25 (6):1130–42. doi:10.1002/csr.1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., N. Sim, and H. Zhao. 2020. Corporate social responsibility, corporate financial performance and the confounding effects of economic fluctuations: A meta-analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis 70:101504. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JamaliRamez, D., and Mirshak. 2007. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):243–62. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauernig, J., and V. Valentinov. 2018. CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: A conceptual framework. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 10 (1):2–25. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., and K. A. Kim. 2020. Corporate governance in China: A survey. Review of Finance 24 (4):733–72. doi:10.1093/rof/rfaa012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanis, R., and G. Richardson. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 26 (1):75–100. doi:10.1108/09513571311285621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70 (4):1–18. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J., M. Bi, and H. Kuang. 2021. Design of evaluation scheme for social responsibility of China’s transportation enterprises from the perspective of green supply chain management. Sustainability 13 (6):3390. doi:10.3390/su13063390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masud, M., M. Rashid, T. Khan, S. M. Bae, and J. D. Kim. 2019. Organizational strategy and corporate social responsibility: The mediating effect of triple bottom line. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (22):1–19. doi:10.3390/ijerph16224559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, P. B., J. P. Vieito, and M. Wang. 2017. The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 42:75–99. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, A., B Zu, C Mza, D. Hwk, G. Msef, and H. Hh. 2021. Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27:1138–48. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou, I. E. 2019. A framework to explicate the relationship between CSER and financial performance: An intellectual capital-based approach and knowledge-based view of firm. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 10 (4):1427–46. doi:10.1007/s13132-017-0491-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Parku, S. S. 2021. When public and business interests collide: An integrated approach to the altruism-instrumentalism tension and corporate social responsibility theory. Journal of Media Ethics 36 (1):2–19. doi:10.1080/23736992.2020.1857254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okafor, A., M. Adusei, and B. N. Adeleye. 2021. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from U.S tech firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 292:126078. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orazalin, N., and M. Baydauletov. 2020. Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (4):1664–76. doi:10.1002/csr.1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primc, K., and T. Čater. 2016. The Influence of organizational life cycle on environmental proactivity and competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities view. Organization & Environment 29 (2):113–16. doi:10.1177/1086026615584684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reverte, C., E. Gomez-Melero, and J. G. Cegarra-Navarro. 2015. The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: Evidence from eco-responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:2870–84. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):111–32. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, S. 1996. Corporate social responsibilities: Law and practice. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., H. Ai, and X. Li. 2015. Political connections, financing constraints, and the optimization of innovation efficiency among China’s private enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 92:290–99. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., and Y. Cui. 2018. Evaluating the coordinated development of economic, social and environmental benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure: Case study of four Chinese autonomous municipalities. Transport Policy 66:116–26. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S., Y. Zhu, F. Wang, and N. Shen. 2022. Can marketization improve sustainable development in northeastern China? Evidence from the perspective of coupling coordination degree model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2022:7419430. doi:10.1155/2022/7419430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., J. Dou, and S. Jia. 2016. A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society 55 (8):1083–121. doi:10.1177/0007650315584317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., H. Lin, and M. Tian. 2019. Corporate sustainability performance of Chinese firms: An empirical analysis from a social responsibility perspective. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56 (9):2027–38. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2019.1608522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., X. Yuan, X. Cheng, R. Mu, and J. Zuo. 2014. Coordinated development of energy, economy and environment subsystems—a case study. Ecological indicators 46:514–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and N. Hu. 2019. The spatial and temporal evolution of coordinated ecological and socioeconomic development in the provinces along the silk road economic belt in China. Sustainable Cities and Society 47:101466. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, L., T. Li, X. Wang, G. Ge, and T. Zhang. 2022. Corporate social responsibility performance evaluation from the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29 (4):918–35. doi:10.1002/csr.2245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., X. Zhao, and Y. He. 2022. Does it pay to be responsible? The performance of ESG investing in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58 (11):3048–75. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2022.2026768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar