378
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Digital Finance

Can Digital Finance Improve Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Heavy Polluting Listed Companies in China

, &

References

  • Bauer, A. M., J. Fang, J. Pittman, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhao. 2020. How aggressive tax planning facilitates the diversion of corporate resources: Evidence from path analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research 37 (3):1882–913. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12563.
  • Beck, T., and A. Demirguc-Kunt. 2006. Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance 30 (11):2931–43. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009.
  • Campos, L. M. S., D. A. de Melo Heizen, M. A. Verdinelli, and P. A. C. Miguel. 2015. Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 99:286–96. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019.
  • Cao, S., L. Nie, H. Sun, W. Sun, and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2021. Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: Evidence from China’s regional economies. Journal of Cleaner Production 327:129458. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129458.
  • Chai, J., H. Wu, and Y. Hao. 2022. Planned economic growth and controlled energy demand: How do regional growth targets affect energy consumption in China?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 185:122068. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122068.
  • Chang, L., W. Li, and X. Lu. 2015. Government engagement, environmental policy, and environmental performance: Evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 24 (1):1–19. doi:10.1002/bse.1802.
  • Chang, C.-P., J. Wen, M. Dong, and Y. Hao. 2018. Does government ideology affect environmental pollutions? New evidence from instrumental variable quantile regression estimations. Energy Policy 113:386–400. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.021.
  • Chen, H., and S. S. Yoon. 2022. Does technology innovation in finance alleviate financing constraints and reduce debt-financing costs? Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review 28 (4):467–92. doi:10.1080/13602381.2021.1874665.
  • Chen, S., J. Zhang, and C. Liu. 2021. Environmental regulation, financing constraints, and enterprise emission reduction: Evidence from pollution levy standards adjustment. Journal of Financial Research 9:51–71.
  • Dey, S., A. Sreenivasulu, G. T. N. Veerendra, K. V. Rao, and P. A. Babu. 2022. Renewable energy present status and future potentials in India: An overview. Innovation and Green Development 100006. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100006.
  • Duan, J., and W. Gao. 2022. Research on the impact of digital finance development on the total factor productivity of enterprises. Contemporary Finance & Economics 5 (5):51–62.
  • Duanmu, J.-L. 2018. Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China. Strategy Management Journal 39 (11):3006–30. doi:10.1002/smj.2948.
  • Duarte, J., S. Siegel, and L. Young. 2012. Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies 25 (8):2455–84. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs071.
  • Elmagrhi, M. H., C. G. Ntim, A. A. Elamer, and Q. Zhang. 2019. A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (1):206–20. doi:10.1002/bse.2250.
  • Feng, G. F., and M. Zheng 2022. Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy innovation: International evidence 100010. Innovation and Green Development. 10.1016/j.igd.2022.100010
  • Fu, Q., Q. Gong, X. X. Zhao, and C. P. Chang. 2022. The effects of international sanctions on green innovations. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 1–24. doi:10.3846/tede.2022.17782.
  • Gabor, D., and S. Brooks. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era. New Political Economy 22 (4):423–36. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1259298.
  • Glass, C., A. Cook, and A. R. Ingersoll. 2016. Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (7):495–511. doi:10.1002/bse.1879.
  • Gomber, P., R. J. Kauffman, C. Parker, and B. W. Weber. 2018. On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems 35 (1):220–65. doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766.
  • Hao, Y., Y. Guo, S. Li, S. Luo, X. Jiang, Z. Shen, and H. Wu. 2022. Towards achieving the sustainable development goal of industry: How does industrial agglomeration affect air pollution?. Innovation and Green Development 1 (1):100003. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100003.
  • Hao, X., Y. Li, S. Ren, H. Wu, and Y. Hao. 2023. The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter?. Journal of environmental management 325:116504. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504.
  • Haque, F., and C. G. Ntim. 2018. Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (3):415–35. doi:10.1002/bse.2007.
  • He, D. 2018. The expansion of internet applications and microeconomic foundations: A theoretical explanation based on the future “data and data dialogue”. Economic Research Journal 53 (08):177–92.
  • Jiang, P. C., G. F. Feng, and H. C. Yang 2022. New measurement of sovereign ESG index 100009. Innovation and Green Development. 10.1016/j.igd.2022.100009
  • Jiang, Y., C. Guo, and Y. Wu. 2022. Does digital finance improve the green investment of Chinese listed heavily polluting companies? The perspective of corporate financialization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (47):71047–63. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z.
  • Kong, T., R. Sun, G. Sun, and Y. Song. 2022. Effects of digital finance on green innovation considering information asymmetry: An empirical study based on Chinese listed firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 1–13. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2022.2149262.
  • Kshetri, N. 2016. Big data’s role in expanding access to financial services in China. International Journal of Information Management 36 (3):297–308. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.014.
  • Laeven, L., R. Levine, and S. Michalopoulos. 2015. Financial innovation and endogenous growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation 24 (1):1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2014.04.001.
  • Lee, C. C., and J. Hussain. 2022. Carbon neutral sustainability and green development during energy consumption. Innovation and Green Development 1 (1):100002. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100002.
  • Lee, I., and Y. J. Shin. 2018. Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons 61 (1):35–46. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003.
  • Liu, T., Y. Zhang, and D. Liang. 2019. Can ownership structure improve environmental performance in Chinese manufacturing firms? The moderating effect of financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 225:58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.267.
  • Long, H., C. P. Chang, S. Jegajeevan, and K. Tang. 2022. Can Central Bank mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the macroeconomy?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58 (9):2652–69. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.2007880.
  • Luo, S., N. Yimamu, Y. Li, H. Wu, M. Irfan, and Y. Hao. 2022. Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China?. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.3223.
  • Maiti, M. 2022. Does improvement in green growth influence the development of environmental related technology?. Innovation and Green Development 1 (2):100008. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100008.
  • Meng, F., and W. Zhang. 2022. Digital finance and regional green innovation: Evidence from Chinese cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (59):89498–521. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22072-2.
  • Muhammad, N., F. Scrimgeour, K. Reddy, and S. Abidin. 2015. The relationship between environmental performance and financial performance in periods of growth and contraction: Evidence from Australian publicly listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 102:324–32. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.039.
  • Nie, X., W. Wang, and X. Pei. 2022. Does enterprise digital transformation affect accounting comparability? Accounting Research 5 (5):17–39.
  • Omonijo, O. N., and Z. Yunsheng. 2022. Impact mechanism of technological innovation by Chinese companies on CSR in Africa mobile communication industry. Innovation and Green Development 1 (2):100005. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100005.
  • Pan, A., X. Liu, J. Qiu, and Y. Shen. 2019. Can green M&A of heavy polluting enterprises achieve substantial transformation under the pressure of media. China Industrial Economics 2 (2):174–92.
  • Peng, B., S. Chen, E. Elahi, and A. Wan. 2021. Can corporate environmental responsibility improve environmental performance? An inter-temporal analysis of Chinese chemical companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (10):12190–201. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11636-9.
  • Peng, X. Y., X. Y. Zou, X. X. Zhao, and C. P. Chang. 2022. How does economic policy uncertainty affect green innovation?. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. doi:10.3846/tede.2022.17760.
  • Ren, S., Y. Hao, and H. Wu. 2022. Digitalization and environment governance: Does internet development reduce environmental pollution?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1–30. doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2033959.
  • Sarfraz, M., B. He, and S. G. M. Shah. 2020. Elucidating the effectiveness of cognitive CEO on corporate environmental performance: The mediating role of corporate innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (36):45938–48. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10496-7.
  • Sun, J. 2020. Environmental protection policy, technological innovation and dynamic effects of carbon emission intensity: Simulation analysis based on three-sector DSGE model. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition) 26 (2):31–45.
  • Tang, S., X. Wu, and J. Zhu. 2020. Digital finance and enterprise technology innovation: Structural feature, mechanism identification and effect difference under financial supervision. Journal of Management World 36 (05):52–66+9.
  • Tao, L., L. Chen, and K. Li. 2021. Corporate financialization, financing constraints, and environmental investment. Sustainability 13 (24):14040. doi:10.3390/su132414040.
  • Walls, J. L., P. Berrone, and P. H. Phan. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal 33 (8):885–913. doi:10.1002/smj.1952.
  • Wang, H. J., K. An, and M. Zheng. 2021. Who has done a better job in fighting the COVID-19 epidemic? Left or Right?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57 (8):2415–25. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.1908259.
  • Wang, Q. J., G. F. Feng, H. J. Wang, and C. P. Chang. 2022. The influence of political ideology on greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change 74:102496. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102496.
  • Wang, Q. J., K. Tang, and H. Q. Hu. 2022. The impact of digital finance on green innovation: Evidence from provinces in China. Innovation and Green Development 100007. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100007.
  • Wang, W., X. Yang, J. Cao, W. Bu, T. S. Adebayo, A. Dilanchiev, and S. Ren 2022. Energy internet, digital economy, and green economic growth: Evidence from China 100011. Innovation and Green Development. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100011.
  • Wen, H., C.-C. Lee, and Z. Song. 2021. Digitalization and environment: How does ICT affect enterprise environmental performance? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (39):54826–41. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14474-5.
  • Wen, H., J. Yue, J. Li, X. Xiu, and S. Zhong. 2022. Can digital finance reduce industrial pollution? New evidence from 260 cities in China. Plos One 17 (4):1–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266564.
  • Wen, J., X. X. Zhao, and C. P. Chang. 2021. The impact of extreme events on energy price risk. Energy Economics 99:105308. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105308.
  • Wu, Y. 2022. The effects of digital finance and financial constraint on financial performance: Firm-level evidence from China’s new energy enterprises. Energy Economics 112:106158. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106158.
  • Xie, X., and Q. Zhu. 2021. How can green innovation solve the dilemmas of“harmonious coexistence”? Journal of Management World 37 (01):128–49+9.
  • Xin, D., Y. Yi, and J. Du. 2022. Does digital finance promote corporate social responsibility of pollution-intensive industry? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (56):1–17. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21695-9.
  • Xue, Q., S. Feng, K. Chen, and M. Li. 2022. Impact of digital finance on regional carbon emissions: An empirical study of sustainable development in China. Sustainability 14 (14):8340. doi:10.3390/su14148340.
  • Xue, Y., C. Jiang, Y. Guo, J. Liu, H. Wu, and Y. Hao. 2022. Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58 (11):3191–214. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2022.2034616.
  • Xu, W., and A. Fan. 2022. Digital finance, internal drive mechanism and real economy growth —-A view from the financialization of entity enterprise. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics 44 (01):28–42.
  • Yang, H. C., Y. F. Cai, and M. Y. Zhang. 2022. Political risk and green technology improvement: New insights from global evidence. Innovation and Green Development 1 (1):100004. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100004.
  • Yang, H. C., G. F. Feng, X. X. Zhao, and C. P. Chang. 2022. The impacts of energy insecurity on green innovation: A multi-country study. Economic Analysis and Policy 74:139–54. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.017.
  • Yin, H. -T., C. -P. Chang, and H. Wang. 2022. The impact of monetary policy on green innovation: Global evidence. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 28 (6):1933–53.
  • Zhang, W., Q. Luo, and S. Liu. 2022a. Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy 74:105–21. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018.
  • Zhang, M., H. Shi, and V. Shi. 2021. Social insurance contributions ratio and productivity of private enterprises in the heavy pollution industry: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 311:127592. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127592.
  • Zhang, Y., R. Zhang, and C. Zhang. 2022b. Insight into the driving force of environmental performance improvement: Environmental regulation or media coverage. Journal of Cleaner Production 358:132024. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132024.
  • Zheng, M., G. -F. Feng, R. -A. Jiang, and C. -P. Chang. 2022. Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China?. Business Strategy and the Environment 1–10. doi:10.1002/bse.3211.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.