284
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Do Industrial Robots Improve Export Product Quality of Multi-Product Enterprises? Evidence in China

, , &

References

  • Acemoglu, D., C. Lelarge, and P. Restrepo. 2020. Competing with robots: Firm-level evidence from France. AEA Papers & Proceedings 110 (5):383–88. doi:10.1257/pandp.20201003.
  • Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2019. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (2):3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3.
  • Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2020. Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy 128 (6):2188–244. doi:10.1086/705716.
  • Acemoglu, D., P. Restrepo, and D. Krueger. 2022. Demographics and automation. The Review of Economic Studies 89 (1):1–44. doi:10.1093/restud/rdab031.
  • Alguacil, M., A. L. Turco, and I. Martínez-Zarzoso. 2022. Robot adoption and export performance: Firm-level evidence from Spain. Economic Modelling 114:105912. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105912.
  • Amable, B., I. Ledezma, and S. Robin. 2016. Product market regulation, innovation, and productivity. Research Policy 45 (10):2087–104. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.003.
  • Amiti, M., and A. K. Khandelwal. 2013. Import competition and quality upgrading. The Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (2):476–90. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00271.
  • Anwar, S., and S. Sun. 2018. Foreign direct investment and export quality upgrading in China’s manufacturing sector. International Review of Economics & Finance 54:289–98. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.09.009.
  • Baldwin, R., and J. Harrigan. 2011. Zeros, quality, and space: Trade theory and trade evidence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3 (2):60–88. doi:10.1257/mic.3.2.60.
  • Bas, M., and V. Strauss-Kahn. 2015. Input-trade liberalization, export prices, and quality upgrading. Journal of International Economics 95 (2):250–62. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.005.
  • Bernini, M., S. Guillou, and F. Bellone. 2015. Financial leverage and export quality: Evidence from France. Journal of Banking & Finance 59:280–96. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.014.
  • Bøler, E., A. Moxnes, and K. Ulltveit-Moe. 2015. R&D, international sourcing, and the joint impact on firm performance. American Economic Review 105 (12):3704–39. doi:10.1257/aer.20121530.
  • Bonfiglioli, A., R. Crinò, H. Finger, and G. Gancia. 2020. Robot imports, and firm-level outcomes. CESifo Working Paper, 8741.
  • Brambilla, I., and G. G. Porto. 2016. High-income export destinations, quality and wages. Journal of International Economics 98:21–35. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.09.004.
  • Broda, C., and D. E. Weinstein. 2006. Globalization and the gains from variety. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2):541–85. doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541.
  • Cai, Z., and J. Qi. 2021. Does the application of industrial robots improve the quality of export products of enterprises? Evidence from Chinese enterprise data. Journal of International Trade 10:17–33.
  • Chen, Y., L. Cheng, and C. C. Lee. 2022. How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence. Ecological Economics 198:107483. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107483.
  • Chen, Y., J. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. 2022. Spatial allocation of industrial robots and labor force. Economic Research Journal 57 (1):172–88.
  • Crowley, F., and P. McCann. 2018. Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: Evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies. Applied Economics 50 (11):1203–21. doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1355543.
  • Crozet, M., K. Head, and T. Mayer. 2012. Quality sorting and trade: Firm-level evidence for French wine. The Review of Economic Studies 79 (2):609–44. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr030.
  • Deming, W. E.1981. Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management. National Productivity Review 1 (1):12–22. doi:10.1002/npr.4040010105.
  • DeStefano, T., and J. Timmis. 2021. Robots and export quality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Research Working Papers. No.9678.
  • Eckel, C., and J. P. Neary. 2010. Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy. The Review of Economic Studies 77 (1):188–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00573.x.
  • Fan, H. Y. Hu, and L. Tang. 2021. Labor costs and the adoption of robots in China. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 186:608–31. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.024.
  • Fan, H., Y. A. Li, and S. R. Yeaple. 2015. Trade Liberalization, quality, and export prices. The Review of Economics and Statistics 97 (5):1033–51. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00524.
  • Feng, L., F. Yuan, and X. Liu. 2023. Industrial robots and enterprise innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. China Economic Quarterly 23 (4):1264–82.
  • Fine, C. H.1986. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Science 32 (10):1301–15. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301.
  • Gervais, A. 2015. Product quality and firm heterogeneity in international trade. Canadian Journal of Economics 48 (3):1152–74. doi:10.1111/caje.12171.
  • Glass, A. J., and X. Wu. 2007. Intellectual property rights and quality investment. Journal of Development Economics 82 (2):393–415. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.08.002.
  • Graetz, G., and G. Michaels. 2018. Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5):753–68. doi:10.1162/rest_a_00754.
  • Graham, J., C. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (1):3–73. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002.
  • Hallak, J. C. and P. K. Schott. 2011. Estimating cross-country differences in product quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (1):417–74. doi:10.1093/qje/qjq003.
  • Hallak, J. C., and J. Sivadasan. 2013. Product and process productivity: Implications for quality choice and conditional exporter premia. Journal of International Economics 91 (1):53–67. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.05.001.
  • Hemous, D., and M. Olsen. 2014. The rise of the machines: Automation, horizontal innovation, and income inequality. CEPR Discussion Paper, 10244.
  • He, J., and X. Tian. 2013. The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 109 (3):856–78. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.001.
  • Hong, L., X. Liu, H. Zhan, and F. Han. 2022. Use of industrial robots and Chinese enterprises’ export quality upgrading: Evidence from China. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 31 (6):860–75. doi:10.1080/09638199.2021.2018021.
  • Huang, X., L. Yu, and Y. Yuan. 2023. Industrial robotics and enterprise innovation: From the perspective of human capital. Studies in Science of Science 41 (2):356–68.
  • Khandelwal, A. K., P. K. Schott, and S. J. Wei. 2013. Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform: Evidence from Chinese exporters. American Economic Review 103 (6):2169–95. doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2169.
  • Klette, T., and Z. Griliches. 2000. Empirical patterns of firm growth and R&D investment: A quality ladder model interpretation. The Economic Journal 110 (463):363–87. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00529.
  • Koch, M., I. Manuylov, and M. Smolka. 2021. Robots and firms. The Economic Journal 131 (638):2553–84. doi:10.1093/ej/ueab009.
  • Kugler, M., and E. Verhoogen. 2012. Prices, plant size, and product quality. The Review of Economic Studies 79 (1):307–39. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr021.
  • Lee, C. C., S. Qin, and Y. Li. 2022. Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 183:121893. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121893.
  • Lee, C. C., Z. Yuan, and S. J. Ho. 2022. How does export diversification affect income inequality? International evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 63:410–21. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.010.
  • Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies 70 (2):317–41. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00246.
  • Li, H., H. Cai, X. Lin, and J. Gu. 2020. Quality imports and quality exports: Micro evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56 (1):106–25. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2019.1680361.
  • Li, Y. Y. Li, A. Pan, X. Pan, and E. Veglianti. 2022. The network structure characteristics and determinants of the belt & road industrial robot trade. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade 58. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.1897315.
  • Lin, C., S. Xiao, and Z. Yin. 2022. How do industrial robots applications affect the quality upgrade of Chinese export trade? Telecommunications Policy 46 (10):102425. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102425.
  • Liu, J., and P. Sun. 2021. How do digital product imports effectively promote enterprise innovation: An empirical analysis based on Chinese microenterprises. Journal of International Trade 464 (8):38–53.
  • Li, L., X. Wang, and Q. Bao. 2021. The employment effect of robots: Mechanism and Chinese experience. Management World 37 (9):104–19.
  • Lu, Y., and L. Yu. 2015. Trade liberalization and markup dispersion: Evidence from China’s WTO accession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7 (4):221–53. doi:10.1257/app.20140350.
  • Manova, K., and Z. Yu. 2017. Multi-product firms and product quality. Journal of International Economics 109:116–37. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.08.006.
  • Mayer, T., M. J. Melitz, and G. I. P. Ottaviano. 2014. Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters. The American Economic Review 104 (2):495–536. doi:10.1257/aer.104.2.495.
  • Melitz, M. J., and S. Polanec. 2015. Dynamic olley-pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. The RAND Journal of Economics 46 (2):362–75. doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12088.
  • Mokyr, J., C. Vickers, and N. L. Ziebarth. 2015. The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3):31–50. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.31.
  • Shen, G., and H. Yu. 2019. Improve Chinese enterprises’ export product quality: Import intermediate goods or import capital goods. Word Economy Studies (12):31-46+131–132.
  • Shi, B. Z., and W. B. Shao. 2014. Measuring and determining factors of export product quality of Chinese enterprises-A micro perspective on cultivating new export competitive advantages. Management World (9):90–106.
  • Song, Y., Y. Wu, G. Deng, and P. Deng. 2021. Intermediate imports, institutional environment, and export product quality upgrading: Evidence from Chinese micro-level enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57 (2):400–26. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2019.1668765.
  • Verhoogen, E. 2008. Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2):489–530. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.489.
  • Wang, Y., and W. Dong. 2020. How does the rise of robots affect China’s labor market?—evidence from listed manufacturing companies. Economic Research Journal 55 (10):159–75.
  • Wang, E. Z., C. C. Lee, and Y. Li. 2022. Assessing the impact of industrial robots on manufacturing energy intensity in 38 countries. Energy Economics 105:105748. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105748.
  • Xie, W., and T. Xue. 2020. FDI and improvements in the quality of export products in the Chinese manufacturing industry. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56 (13):3106–16. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2019.1609936.
  • Xu, H. L., and H. C. Wang. 2016. The effect of minimum wage standards on firms’ export quality. Journal of World Economy 7:73–96.
  • Yu, M. J., and R. Zhang. 2017. The effect of RMB appreciation on export quality: Micro evidence from China. Management World (5):28–40+187.
  • Zhang, J., F. X. Zhai, and X. Y. Zhou. 2015. Government subsidies, market competition and export product quality [J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics 32 (4):71–87.
  • Zhao, P., Y. Gao, and X. Sun. 2022. How does artificial intelligence affect green economic growth?—evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment 834:155306. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155306.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.