The Impact of Digital Economy on Firm Performance: Evidence from China

References

• Anandhi, B., B. Sundar, and K. Benn. 1999. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science 45 (7):905–1024. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos, J. Y. 1991. A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quarterly 15 (3):295–310. doi:10.2307/249641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, I., J. Whitaker, and S. Mithas. 2006. Information technology, production process outsourcing, and manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (2):13–40. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayo‐Moriones, A., M. Billón, and F. Lera‐López. 2013. Perceived performance effects of ICT in manufacturing SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems 113 (1):117–35. doi:10.1108/02635571311289700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. 2000. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24 (1):169–96. doi:10.2307/3250983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and L. Hitt. 1996. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42 (4):541–58. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt, and S. Yang. 1996. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2002 (1):137–81.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee. 2011. Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy[M]. Broomfield, Colorado: Digital Frontier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buyl, T., C. Boone, W. Hendriks, and P. Matthyssens. 2011. Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies 48 (1):151–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00932.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygstad, B., H. P. Aanby, and J. Iden. 2017. Leading digital transformation: The Scandinavian way. In Proceedings of Scandinavian conference on information systems, Halden, Norway, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, H. C., C. E. Koh, and V. R. Prybutok. 2014. Information technology capability and firm performance: Contradictory findings and their possible causes. MIS Quarterly 38 (1):305–26. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., R. H. Chiang, and V. C. Storey. 2012. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly 36 (4):1165–88. doi:10.2307/41703503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. 2020. Improving market performance in the digital economy. China Economic Review 62:101482. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciriello, R. F., A. Richter, and G. Schwabe. 2018. Digital innovation. Business & Information Systems Engineering 60 (6):563–69. doi:10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côrte-Real, N., P. Ruivo, and T. Oliveira. 2020. Leveraging internet of things and big data analytics initiatives in European and American firms: Is data quality a way to extract business value? Information & Management 57 (1):103–41. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., H. Singh, and W. S. Hesterly. 2018. The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal 39 (12):3140–62. doi:10.1002/smj.2785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elyasiani, E., and J. Jia. 2010. Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance. Journal of Banking and Finance 34 (3):606–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J., C. I. Fernandes, and F. A. Ferreira. 2019. To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research 101:583–90. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G20 Research Group. 2016. G20 digital economy development and cooperation initiative. Report of G20 Meetings.
   Google Scholar
• Gnangnon, S. K., and H. Iyer. 2018. Does bridging the internet access divide contribute to enhancing countries’ integration into the global trade in services markets? Telecommunications Policy 42 (1):61–77. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., M. Keil, J. Muntermann, and M. Mähring 2015. Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research 26 (1):57–80. doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresov, C., H. A. Haveman, and T. A. Oliva. 1993. Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organization Science 4 (2):181–208. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.2.181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. 2019. Proposals for a digital industrial policy for Europe. Telecommunications Policy 43 (2):116–27. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajli, M., J. M. Sims, and V. Ibragimov. 2015. Information technology (IT) productivity paradox in the 21st century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64 (4):457–78. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haucap, J., and U. Heimeshoff. 2014. Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the internet driving competition or market monopolization? International Economics & Economic Policy 11 (1):49–61. doi:10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6.
   Google Scholar
• He, F., and H. Liu. 2019. Evaluation of Performance Enhancement of Brick-and-Mortar Enterprise under the digital-economy perspective. Reform 4 (1):137–48. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, and D. L. Sexton. 2001. Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6‐7):479–91. doi:10.1002/smj.196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., S. Qin, and Y. Zhang. 2022. How does the digital economy drive the upgrading of manufacturing industry?(In Chinese). Business Management Journal 44 (4):80–97.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, D. W. 2018. Information technology and US productivity growth: Evidence from a prototype industry production account. Journal of Productivity Analysis 49 (2–3):143–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., and D. Sarv. 2003. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research 14 (2):127–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohtamäki, M., V. Parida, P. C. Patel, and H. Gebauer. 2020. The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151:119804. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leischnig, A., S. Woelfl, and B. S. Ivens. 2016. When does digital business strategy matter to market performance? In Proceedings of Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems 2016, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., X. Yan, M. Song, and W. Yang. 2020. Fintech and corporate innovation ———evidence from Chinese NEEQ-listed companies (in Chinese). China Industrial Economics 2020 (1):18.
   Google Scholar
• Loebbecke, C., and A. Picot. 2015. Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24 (3):149–57. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Caro, E., J. G. Cegarra-Navarro, and F. J. Alfonso-Ruiz. 2020. Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 154 (2):119962. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119962.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, F. J., W. L. Fuerst, and J. B. Barney. 1995. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19 (4):487–505. doi:10.2307/249630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., M. Boura, G. Lekakos, and J. Krogstie. 2019. Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management 30 (2):272–98. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., V. A. Framnes, F. Danielsen, J. Krogstie, and D. Olsen. 2017. Big data analytics capability: Antecedents and business value. In Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2017, Langkawi, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., and J. Krogstie. 2020. Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. European Journal of Information Systems 29 (3):260–87. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., I. O. Pappas, J. Krogstie, and M. Giannakos. 2018. Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and E-Business Management 16 (3):547–78. doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review 80 (3):511–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and J. Wilsdon. 2001. Digital futures—an agenda for a sustainable digital economy. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8 (3):275–80. doi:10.1016/S1066-7938(01)00116-6.
   Google Scholar
• Mithas, S., and R. T. Rust. 2016. How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance. Mis Quarterly 40 (1):223–46. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.1.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, O., M. Fay, and J. Vom Brocke. 2018. The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 35 (2):488–509. doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 10 (S1):125–41. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemand, T., J. P. C. Rigtering, A. Kallmünzer, S. Kraus, and A. Maalaoui. 2020. Digitalization in the financial industry: A contingency approach of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic vision on digitalization. European Management Journal 39 (3):317–26. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., O. A. El Sawy, and P. C. Fiss. 2017. The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: A configurational approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 18 (9):648–86. doi:10.17705/1jais.00467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rei, C. M. 2004. Causal evidence on the “productivity paradox” and implications for managers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 53 (2):129–42. doi:10.1108/17410400410515034.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, S., L. Li, Y. Han, Y. Hao, and H. Wu. 2022. The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (4):1656–78. doi:10.1002/bse.2975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, H. S., and J. N. Lee. 2018. Understanding the role of technology in service innovation: Comparison of three theoretical perspectives. Information & Management 55 (3):294–307. doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. H., Z. Long, C. C. Lee, and J. Zhang. 2022. Comparative advantage, endowment structure, and trade imbalances. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 60:365–75. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2021.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, N., T. Knudsen, and M. C. Becker. 2016. Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environment. Strategic Management Journal 37 (9):1854–64. doi:10.1002/smj.2433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., L. Zhao, P. Kaur, N. Islam, and A. Dhir. 2023. Theorizing the relationship between the digital economy and firm productivity: The idiosyncrasies of firm-specific contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 189:122329. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppatvech, C., J. Godsell, and S. Day. 2019. The roles of internet of things technology in enabling servitized business models: A systematic literature review. Industrial Marketing Management 82:70–86. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. 1996. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence[M], 98–101. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vidgen, R., S. Shaw, and D. B. Grant. 2017. Management challenges in creating value from business analytics. European Journal of Operational Research 261 (2):626–39. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., L. Chen, and Y. Li. 2022. Digital economy and urban low-carbon sustainable development: The role of innovation factor mobility in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (32):1–19. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19182-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., C. C. Wang, S. Sepasgozar, and S. Zlatanova. 2020. A systematic review of digital technology adoption in off-site construction: Current status and future direction towards industry 4.0. Buildings 10 (11):204. doi:10.3390/buildings10110204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, H., Q. Zhong, and C. C. Lee. 2022. Digitalization, competition strategy and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies. International Review of Financial Analysis 82:102166. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Y. Wu, M. Zhang, and J. Li. 2023. Opening the black box of human resource allocations in audit firms: The assignment of audit partners to audit engagements. The British Accounting Review 101231.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D. M., and Y. W. Liu. 2018. Why can internet plus increase performance (in Chinese). China Industrial Economics 5:80–98.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., L. Ying, and M. Gao. 2020. The influence of intelligent manufacturing on financial performance and innovation performance: The case of China. Enterprise Information Systems 14 (6):812–32. doi:10.1080/17517575.2020.1746407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef, A. B., S. Boubaker, B. Dedaj, and M. Carabregu-Vokshi. 2021. Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 164:120043. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunis, M., A. Tarhini, and A. Kassar. 2018. The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research 88:344–56. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., H. J. Sapienz, and P. Davidsson. 2006. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, Model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4):917–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Y., Tao, and C. Nie, 2022. Does broadband infrastructure boost firm productivity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Finance Research Letters 48:102886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., Z. Zhang, and S. K. Liang. 2020. Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from urban China (in Chinese). Management World 36 (10):65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, X., and G. Ren. 2023. Independent and joint effects of CSR and CSI on the effectiveness of digital transformation for transition economy firms. Journal of Business Research 156:113478. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., M. Kautonen, W. Dai, and H. Zhang. 2021. Exploring how digitalization influences incumbents in financial services: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, firm assets, and organizational legitimacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173:121120. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar