NEW COMMONS: TOWARDS A NECESSARY REAPPRAISAL

References

• Bauwens, M., & Kostakis, V. (2014). From the communism of capital to capital for the commons: Towards an open co-operativism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(1), 356–361. doi:10.31269/triplec.v12i1.561
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2013). Commons and growth: The essential role of open commons in market economies. University of Chicago Law Review, 80(3), 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlinguer, M. (2018). The value of sharing. How commons have become part of informational capitalism and what we can learn from it. The case of FOSS. Rassegna italiana di sociologia, 2(2018), 263–288. doi:10.1423/90580
   Google Scholar
• Berlinguer, M. (2019). “Introduction.” In M. Berlinguer (Ed.), Barcelona innovadora: Bienes comunes digitales y nuevos modelos económicos (pp. 13–35). Repensar la Smart City: Icaria, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Berlinguer, M. (2020, January). Commons, Markets and Public Policy. Transform! ePaper, ISBN: 978-3-903343-00-9.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinbine, B. (2017). From the commons to capital: Red Hat, Inc. and the business of free software. Journal of Peer Production, 10. http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/issues/issue-10-peer-production-and-work/from-the-commons-to-capital/
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3–4), 161–188. doi:10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 33–74.
   Google Scholar
• Coriat, B. (2015). Le retour des communs & la crise de l’idéologie propriétaire. Paris: Éditions Les Liens qui libèrent.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A., & Wright, G. (1999, September). General purpose technologies and surges in productivity: Historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution ( Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History Number 31). University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eghbal, N. (2016). Roads and bridges: The unseen labor behind our digital infrastructure. Ford Foundation.  https://fordfoundcontent.blob.core.windows.net/media/2976/roads-and-bridges-the-unseen-labor-behind-our-digital-infrastructure.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, L. (2011). Ostrom’s Law: Property rights in the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 5(1), 1. doi:10.18352/ijc.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLOSSMetrics Consortium. (2010). FLOSSMetrics final report. https://es.scribd.com/document/112962603/Fm3-Final-Report-En
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, K. (2017). Producing open source software: How to run a successful free software project.  Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann, B. M. (2009). Infrastructure commons in economic perspective. In W. H. Lehr, & L. Pupillo (eds.), Internet Policy and Economics (pp. 29–55). Berlino: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 162 (13), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2004). The ‘new’imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001). Regulationist and autopoieticist reflections on Polanyi’s account of market economies and the market society. New Political Economy, 6(2), 213–232. doi:10.1080/13563460120060616
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2, 459–482.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, A. (2017). Wikipedia, work, and capitalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013). Taxpayers Helped Apple but Apple Won’t Help Them. Harvard Business Review Blog, 8.  https://hbr.org/2013/03/taxpayers-helped-apple-but-app
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Canto Classics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316423936
   Google Scholar
• Perens, B. (2005, October 3). The emerging economic paradigm of open source. First Monday. Special Issue #2: Open Source
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185–202. doi:10.1093/cje/bep051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichman, J. H., & Uhlir, P. F. (2003). A contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 315–462.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rigi, J. (2014). The coming revolution of peer production and revolutionary cooperatives. A response to Michel Bauwens, Vasilis Kostakis and Stefan Meretz. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(1), 390–404. doi:10.31269/triplec.v12i1.486
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. (1986). The comedy of the commons: Custom, commerce, and inherently public property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 53(3), 711–781. doi:10.2307/1599583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C. (2003). Romans, roads, and romantic creators: Traditions of public property in the information age. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. E. (2000). Semicommon property rights and scattering in the open fields. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 131–169. doi:10.1086/468066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg, J. (2015). Hacking capitalism: The free and open source software movement. New York. : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vercellone, C., Bria, F., Monnier, Fumagalli, A., Gentilucci, E., Giuliani, A., … Vattimo, P. (2015). Managing the commons in the knowledge economy, D3. 1 - D-Cent. Retrieved 04/ 01/2018. https://dcentproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/D3.2-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. MA, US: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar