Subversive communication against neoliberalism

References

• Arancibia, J. P. (2006). Comunicación Política. Fragmentos para una Genealogía de la Mediatización en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Arcis.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. (2006). Capitalism 3.0: A guide to reclaiming the commons. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V., & Pazaitis, A. (2019). Peer to peer: The commons manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2013). Practical anarchism: Peer mutualism, market power, and the fallible state. Politics & Society, 41(2), 213–251. doi:10.1177/0032329213483108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinbine, B. (2018). Commons praxis: Towards a critical political economy of the digital commons. tripleC, 16(1), 290–305. doi:10.31269/triplec.v16i1.929
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, S. (2011, November 18). La tecnocracia desaloja la política. El País. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/diario/2011/11/18/internacional/1321570805_850215.html
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2014). Think like a commoner: A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2005). Edgework, critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalín, C. (2014). The conservative response to the 2011 Chilean student movement: Neoliberal education and media. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(4), 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón, F., Piscitelli, A., & Reyna, J. (1992). Social movements: Actors, theories, expectations. In A. Escobar & S. Alvarez (Eds.), The making of social movements in Latin America (pp. 19–36). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J. (2013). 24/7 late capitalism and the ends of sleep. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J. (2002). Media and power. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun, Essai sur la Revolution au Xxie Siècle. Paris, France: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia, on the commons and the transformation to postcapitalism. London, UK: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2009). Neoliberalism and Other Fantasies. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Euler, J. (2015). Commons-creating society: On the radical German commons discourse. Review of Radical Political Economics, 48(1), 93–110. doi:10.1177/0486613415586988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: Moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economics, 143, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. (1979). Personal politics: the roots of women’s liberation in the civil rights movement and the new left. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, N. (2016). Digital, radical, political. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, J. M. (1989). Les transformations de la publicité politique. Hermes, La Revue, 4, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J. (2002). The decline and fall of the lettered city: Latin America in the cold war. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy]. In C. Calhoun (Ed.) Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. (2014). Common ground. Democracy and collectivity in an age of individualism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy project. A history, a crisis, a movement. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, (3), 49–55. doi:10.2307/487737
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. (2008). Neoliberalism, social movements and change in media systems in the late twentieth century. In D. Hesmondhalgh & J. Toynbee (Eds.), The media and social theory (pp. 43–58). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2002). Change the world without taking power. The meaning of revolution today. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplún, M. (1985). Democracia y Comunicación Popular. Revista Accio´n Cri´tica, 18. Retrieved from http://www.ts.ucr.ac.cr/binarios/accioncritica/ac-cr-018-05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ketchley, N. (2017). Egypt in a time of revolution. Contentious politics and the arab spring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabish, A. (2019). Ecologies of the radical imagination. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2001). The future of ideas. The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop, thief!: The commons, enclosures, and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lugo-Ocando, J. (2008). An introduction to the maquilas of power: media and political transition in Latin America. In J. Lugo-Ocando (Ed.), The media in Latin America (pp. 1–12). New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magrini, A., & Rincón, O. (2010). Mucho Gobierno y Muchos Medios, Poco Periodismo y Pocas Ciudadanías. In O. Rincón (Ed.), ¿Por Qué Nos Odian Tanto? Estado y Medios de Comunicación en América Latina (pp. 313–329). Bogotá, Colombia: Centro de Competencia en Comunicación para América Latina Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Márquez, I. (2010). Liberation in theology, philosophy, and pedagogy. In S. Nuccetelli & O. Schutte (Eds.), A companion to Latin American philosophy (pp. 297–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2014). First thoughts of a phenomenology of the commons. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the commons. A world beyond market and state (pp. 37–44). Amherst, MA: Levelers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. (1992). Emociones y Lenguaje en Educación y Política. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Pedagógicas Chilenas, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2001). Coloniality at large: The western hemisphere in the colonial horizon of modernity. CR The New Centennial Review, 1(2), 19–54. doi:10.1353/ncr.2003.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraña, M., Dussel, E., & Jáuregui, C. (2008). Colonialism and its Replicants. In M. Moraña, E. Dussel, & C. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large. Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 1–22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, L. (2010). From the streets to the net? The political use of the internet by social movements. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 1(1), 1–21. doi:10.4018/jep.2010102201
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics, Thinking the world politically. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2011). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284, 278–282. doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitropoulos, E. (2018). Commons-based peer production in the work of Yochai Benkler. tripleC, 16(2), 835–856. doi:10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1009
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, M. (1996). Un Cierto Desparpajo. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Número Crítico.
   Google Scholar
• Portales, D. (1983). El Movimiento Popular y las Comunicaciones: Reflexiones a Partir de la Experiencia Chilena. In F. Reyes (Ed.), Comunicación Alternativa y Búsquedas Democráticas (pp. 59–69). Ciudad de México, México: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales and Friederich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2004). Disagreement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra Utman, J. (2019). The media commons and social movements: Grassroots mediations against neoliberal politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Unequal political voice and the broken promise of american democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (2013). Foreword of Ricoveri, G. Nature for sale, commons versus commodities. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. (1997). Ascenso tecnocrático y democracia en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 152, 68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B., & Yuill, S. (2016). Capital experimentation with person/a formation: how facebook’s monetization refigures the relationship between property, personhood and protest. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 380–396. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1111403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrides, S. (2017). Omnia sunt communia: Principles for the transition to postcapitalism. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2000). Media in South America: Between the rock of the state and the hard place of the market. In J. Curran & M.-J. Park (Eds.), De-Westernizing media studies (pp. 50–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolton, D. (1998). La Comunicación Política: Construcción de un Modelo. In J. M. Ferry & D. Wolton (Eds.), El Nuevo Espacio Público (pp. 28–44). Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar