1,249
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

An On-Demand Oxygen Flow Meter for Enhanced Patient Comfort and Reduced Oxygen Cost in Hospitals

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 274-281 | Received 01 Feb 2022, Accepted 12 May 2022, Published online: 01 Jun 2022

References

  • Campbell EJ, Baker MD, Crites-Silver P. Subjective effects of humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula. A prospective study. Chest. 1988;93(2):289–293.
  • Andres D, Thurston N, Brant R, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of the effects of humidified compared with nonhumidified low flow oxygen therapy on the symptoms of patients. Can Respir J. 1997;4(2):76–78. DOI:10.1155/1997/296763
  • O’Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008;63(Supplement 6):vi1–68. DOI:10.1136/thx.2008.102947
  • Jadhav S, Sahasrabudhe T, Kalley V, et al. The microbial colonization profile of respiratory devices and the significance of the role of disinfection: a blinded study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1021–1026.
  • Wada S, Tanaka M, et al. Effective timing of oxygen inhalation for alveolar gas exchange:a simulation using a respiratory model. Am Soc Mech Eng Bioeng Div. 2001;40:401–402.
  • Barker AF, Burgher LW, Plummer AL. Oxygen conserving methods for adults. Chest. 1994;105(1):248–252. DOI:10.1378/chest.105.1.248
  • Floreani A, Kerby GR, Pingleton SK, et al. Evaluation of a demand-flow O2 delivery device. Chest. 1986;89:485S.
  • Tiep B, Carter R. Oxygen conserving devices and methodologies. Chron Respir Dis. 2008;5(2):109–114. DOI:10.1177/1479972308090691
  • Kerby GR, O’Donohue WJ, Romberger DJ, et al. Clinical efficacy and cost benefit of pulse flow oxygen in hospitalized patients. Chest. 1990;97(2):369–372. DOI:10.1378/chest.97.2.369
  • Gloeckl R, Osadnik C, Bies L, et al. Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology. 2019;24(4):329–337. DOI:10.1111/resp.13457
  • Langenhof S, Fichter J. Comparison of two demand oxygen delivery devices for administration of oxygen in COPD. Chest. 2005;128(4):2082–2087. DOI:10.1378/chest.128.4.2082
  • Garrod R, Bestall JC, Paul E, et al. Evaluation of pulsed dose oxygen delivery during exercise in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999;54(3):242–244. DOI:10.1136/thx.54.3.242
  • Cuvelier A, Muir JF, Czernichow P, et al. Nocturnal efficiency and tolerance of a demand oxygen delivery system in COPD patients with nocturnal hypoxemia. Chest. 1999;116(1):22–29. DOI:10.1378/chest.116.1.22
  • Chatburn RL, Lewarski JS, McCoy RW. Nocturnal oxygenation using a pulsed-dose oxygen-conserving device compared to continuous flow. Respir Care. 2006;51(3):252–256.
  • Bower JS, Brook CJ, Zimmer K, et al. Performance of a demand oxygen saver system during rest, exercise, and sleep in hypoxemic patients. Chest. 1988;94(1):77–80. DOI:10.1378/chest.94.1.77
  • Peter T, Bliss L L, Robert W, et al. Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations. Respir Care. 2004;49(2):160–165.
  • Peter T, L Bliss L, Robert W, et al. A bench study comparison of demand oxygen delivery systems and continuous flow oxygen. Respir Care. 1999;44:925–931.