An Examination of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Dedicated Biotechnology Firms: Context Matters

REFERENCES

• Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐Laham, A., Amburgey, T. L., & Bates, K. (2008). The dynamics of research alliances: Examining the effect of alliance experience and partner characteristics on the speed of alliance entry in the biotech industry. British Journal of Management, 19(4), 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (2003). Small-firms strategic research partnerships: The case of biotechnology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(2), 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, S., Todd, C., Finlay, I., Grande, G., & Wyatt, P. (2002). Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Family Practice, 19(1), 105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., & Smith, A. D. (2006). Improving survey response rates for chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 54(4), 421–438.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1),31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3),411–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., & Hultenschmidt, N. (2007). New path to profits in biotech: Take the acquisition exit. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 13(2), 78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, G. (2005). Cluster, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A., Bradley, S. P., & Hamel, G. H. (1992). Outsourcing and industrial decline. The Executive, 6(1), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshuizen, J., Geurts, P., & Van Der Veen, A. (2009). Regional social networks as conduits for knowledge spillovers: Explaining performance of high-tech firms. Tijdschrift voor Econimishce en Sociale Geografie, 100(2), 183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. E., & Davidsson, P. (1998 , May). Entrepreneurial orientation versus entrepreneurial management: Relating Miller/Covin & Slevin’s conceptualization to Stevenson’s. Entrepreneurship Research Conference (pp. 21–23). Gent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill, G. S., & Lee, K. B. (1992). Biotech 93: Accelerating commercialization: An industry annual report. New York, NY: Ernst & Young.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, S. (2007). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Research Policy, 36(4), 438–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities: Venture strategies and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (1999). A theory of the going public decision. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 249–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V., & Chiaroni, D. (2005). Industrial clusters in biotechnology, driving forces, development processes and management practices. London, England: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation, 32(9–10), 560–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., & D. M. DeCarolis (2010). Business–university alliances and innovation in new and adolescent technology ventures. In D. B. Audretsch, G. B. Dagnino, and R. Faraci ( Eds.), New frontiers in entrepreneurship: Recognizing, seizing, and executing opportunities ( pp. 175–194). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. S., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 175–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2011). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A., Marino, L. D., Aaron, J. R., & Tolbert, C. L. (2011). An examination of entrepreneurial orientation, environmental scanning, and market strategies of nonprofit and for-profit nursing home administrators. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarolis, D. M. (2003). Competencies and imitability in the pharmaceutical industry: An analysis of their relationship with firm performance. Journal of Management, 29(1), 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeClercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 21–229.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configuration models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entebang, H., Harrison, R. T., & de Run, C. E. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation of public enterprises in Malaysia. Business Strategy Series, 11(2), 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young (2005). Competitive growth and growing competition. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/alumni/whitepapers
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. H. (1949). The entrepreneur and economic theory: A historical and analytical approach. The American Economic Review, 39(3), 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes, M. (2005). Distant networking: The knowledge acquisition strategies of “out-cluster” biotechnology firms. European Planning Studies, 13(6), 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, G. (2006, December). Pipeline problems are increasing the urge to merge. Nature, 5, 977–979.
   Google Scholar
• Gaglio, C. (1997). Opportunity identification: Review, critique and suggested research direction. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus ( Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth ( pp. 139–202). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gassman, O., Reepmeyer, G., & Zedwitz, M. V. (2004). Leading pharmaceutical innovation: Trends and drivers for growth in the pharmaceutical industry. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, B., & Dousset, B. (2005). Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 34(10), 1457–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Zahra, S., & Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Kerr, W. R. (2009). Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 623–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golec, J. H., & Vernon, J. A. (2007). Financial risk in the biotechnology industry (Paper No. w13604). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1987). The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 910–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashai, N., & Almor, T. A. (2004). Gradually internationalizing “born global” firms: An oxymoron. International Business Review, 13(4), 465–483.
   Google Scholar
• Herper, M. (2012). The truly staggering cost of inventing new drugs. Forbes Online. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2012/02/10/the-truly-staggering-cost-of-inventing-new-drugs/
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. J., & Rodriguez, D. (2006). The outsourcing of R&D through acquisition in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 351–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. R., Holmes R. M., & Connelly, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., & Hill, C. W. (1993). Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organization Science, 4(2), 325–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1207–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, D. H., Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2007). Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Research Policy, 36(5), 768–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing and Management, 36(5), 651–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, K. P., & Chiang, Y. H. (2010). Open innovation proclivity, entrepreneurial orientation, and perceived firm performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3), 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Murray, F., & Henderson, R. (2003). Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 203–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilji, S. E., Mroczkowski, T., & Bernstein, B. (2006). From invention to innovation: Toward developing an integrated innovation model for biotech firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 528–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klapper, L., Laeven, L., and Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Finance Economics, 82(3), 591–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2012). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00530.x
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S. I., Frese, M., Friedrich, C., & Unger, J. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 143), 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiser, P., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kukalis, S. (2010). Agglomeration economies and firm performance: The case of industry clusters. Journal of Management, 26(2), 453–481.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., Dowling, M., (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 615–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., & Merges, R. P. (1998). The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46 (2), 125–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. (2001). How does new venture strategy matter in the environment–performance relationship? Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Liu, Y., Yi, D., & Li, M. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic flexibilities and indigenous firm innovation in transitional China. International Journal of Technology Management, 41(1), 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W., & Tsai, M. T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (2001). Why has IPO underpricing increased over time? ( Working paper). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 241–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to the firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhok, R., & Osegowitsch, T. (2000). The international biotechnology industry: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. (1997). Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional, and national change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, L., Strandholm, K., Steensma, H. K., & Weaver, K. M. (2002). The moderating effect of national culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• McEachern, W. A. (1975). Managerial control and performance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organization strategy, structure, and process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momma, S., & Sharp, M. (1999). Developments in new biotechnology firms in Germany. Technovation, 19(5), 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J. (2008). Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organization “buzz” and pipelines” in life science communities. Economic Geography, 84(4), 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niosi, J (2003). Alliances are not enough: Explaining rapid growth in biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(5), 737–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: Subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norburn, D. (1989). The chief executive: A breed apart. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, A. L. (2004). Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research Policy, 33(4), 583–597.
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effect of spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1),5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Luño, A., Wiklund, J., & Cabrera, R. V. (2010). The dual nature of innovative activity: How entrepreneurial orientation influences innovation generation and adoption. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 555–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2013). The research and development process. Retrieved from http://www.phrma.org/research-development-process
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. P. (2006). Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 114–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollack, A. (2009, March 28). Biotech firm to liquidate under investor’s pressure. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com on March 30, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. M., Ainuddin, R.A., & Junit, SH. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits on entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(1),61–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevezer, M. (1997). The dynamics of industrial clustering in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 9(3), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, G., & Li, L. (2003). Profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 881–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, K., & Ramnarayan, S. (1993). Entrepreneurial orientation and networking: Some Indian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 86, 513–524.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renko, M., Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2009). The effect of a market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and technological capability on innovativeness: A study of young biotechnology ventures in the United States and in Scandinavia. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 331–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, O. C., Wu, R. P., & Chadwick, K. (2009). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: The role of CEO position tenure and industry tenure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 1078–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience, and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1980). Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 653–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarmoutzos, L. M. (2006). The Economic Promise of Biotechnology. BioExecutive International, 2(7), 12–13
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1950). Essays. Ed. R. V. Clemence. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmesiter, E. B. (1997). Research methods in psychology (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D, firm size and innovation: An empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. S., & Baum, J. A. (2002). Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 791–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Veiga, J. J. F. (2010). The impact of CEO core self‐evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. S. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March ( Ed.), Handbook of organizations ( pp. 153–193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Stram, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Ding, W. W. (2007).Vertical alliance networks: The case of university-biotechnology-pharmaceutical alliance changes. Research Policy, 36(4), 477–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Exploring proactiveness as a moderator in the process of perceiving industrial munificence: A field study of SMEs in four countries. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesmar, D., & Thoenig, M. (2004). Financial market development and the rise in firm level uncertainty. Paris, France: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tripsas, M. (1997). Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18( Summer Special Issue), 119–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. (2003). A survey of the use of biotechnology in US industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Administration Bureau of Industry Security.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. (1971). The process of technological innovation within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales, W. J., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 35(5), 895–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 541–567.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship, Theory, and Practice, Firm Performance, 32(4), 635–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. M., & Catanach, A. H. (1997). A longitudinal disaggregation of operational risk under changing regulatory conditions: Evidence from the savings and loan industry. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 799–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship, Theory, & Practice, 35(2), 293–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93(23), 12709–12716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. (1997). Individual action and the demand for institution. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 502–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar