Phenomenology Redux: Doing Phenomenology, Becoming Phenomenological

REFERENCES

• Alvesson, M., C., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aprigliano, T. C. (2000). The experience of courage development in transformational leaders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(10), 5245B.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. (1972). A precise phenomenology for the general scholar. Journal of General Education, 23, 261–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaga, G. L., Jr. (2000). A calling to work, a labor of love: A phenomenological study of the experience of work as calling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(04), 1502A.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, L. (2004). A hermeneutic phenomenological study of philanthropian leadership. Boca Raton FL: Dissertation.com
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1989). The rustle of language. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beets, N. (1952/75). Verstandhouding en onderscheid: Een onderzoek naar de verhouding van medisch en pedagogisch denken. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Meppel.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P. (1994). The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In P. Benner ( Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness (pp. 99–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S.D. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Meet the movement. An interview with Kim Cameron, Jane Dutton, and Robert Quinn. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 266–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and thou, Trans. R. G. Smith. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, J. G., & Hodgson, V. E. (1983). Natural learning and managerial action: A phenomenological study in the field setting. Journal of Management Studies. 20(3), 387–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R. (2007). Appreciative inquiry is not (just) about the positive. Organization Development Practitioner, 39(4), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1943). Over de pijn. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Het Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, T. A. (2007). Method or madness: Phenomenology as knowledge creator. Journal of Management Inquiry.16(3), 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L. (1990). Positive image, positive action: The affirmative basis of organizing. In S. Srivastva & D. L. Cooperrider ( Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organizations ( pp. 91–125). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore ( Eds.), Research in organizational change and development ( Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person–environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(4), 802–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, R., Simpson, P., & Harvey, C. (2009). ‘Negative capability’: A contribution to the understanding of creative leadership. In B. Sievers, H. Brunning, J. De Gooijer, & L. J. Gould ( Eds.), Psychoanalytic studies of organizations: Contributions from the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations ( pp. 197–216). London, UK: Karnac Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fripp, J., Fripp, M., & Fripp, D. (2000). Speaking of science: Notable quotes on science, engineering, and the environment. Eagle Rock, VA: LLH Technology Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, S. (2006). The (im)possibilities of writing the self writing: French Post-structural theory and autoethnography. Cultural Studies, Critical Mythologies. 6(4), 474–495.
   Google Scholar
• Garratt, D., & Hodkinson, P. (1999). Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 515–539.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1979). From the native’s point of view. On the nature of anthropological understanding. In P. Rabinow & W. M. Sullivan ( Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader ( pp. 225–241). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Reprinted from Meaning in Anthropology, pp. 221–237, by K. H. Basso & H. A. Selby [Eds.], 1976, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press)
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (2002). Ethnographic representation as relationship. In A. Bochner & C. Ellis ( Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics ( pp. 11–33). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. K. (2004). Being mentored: The experience of women faculty. Journal of Career Development, 30(3), 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. K., & Hanes, L. A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review. 2(2), 181–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, W. L. (2000). Exploring the sense of self in the workplace. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(09), 5042B.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. M. (1990). Applied phenomenology and organization. Public Administration Quarterly, 14(1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. (1997, June). Relativity without relativism: Reflexivity in post-paradigm organization studies. British Journal of Management, 8( Special Issue), S5–S17.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Clegg, S. (2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research ‘subject.’ Human Relations, 54(5), 531–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, M., Hardy, C., & Alvesson, M. (2004). Reflecting on reflexivity. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2004 CMS.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselgreen, B. & Beach, D. (1999). Phenomenography: a “good for nothing brother” of phenomenology?, Net Paper, Goteborg, Sweden: Goteborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Huffington, C. (2004). What women leaders can tell us. In C. Huffington, D. Armstrong, W. Halton, L. Hoyle, & J. Pooley ( Eds.), Working below the surface: The emotional life of contemporary organizations ( pp. 49–66). London, UK: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Huffington, C., James, K., & Armstrong, D. (2004). What is the emotional cost of distributed leadership? In C. Huffington, D. Armstrong, W. Halton, L. Hoyle, & J. Pooley ( Eds.), Working below the surface: The emotional life of contemporary organizations ( pp. 67–82). London, UK: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, D. E. (1987). Beginning with ourselves: In practice, theory, and human affairs. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas toward a pure phenomenology and a phenomenological philosophy. Trans. W. R. B. Gibson. New York, NY: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1913)
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York, NY: Collier.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations. Trans. J. Findlay. London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1900)
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations. Ed. D. Moran. 2nd ed., 2 vols. London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1900–1901).
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, M. A. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, K. (1968). The phenomenological approach in psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1313–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. J. & Klee, T. (2007). Passive-aggressive behavior and leadership styles in organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 14(2), 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Trans. H. J. Patton. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Keats, J. (1970) The letters of John Keats: A selection. Ed. R. Gittings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kupers, W. (2002). Phenomenology of aesthetic organizing: Ways towards aesthetically responsive organizations. Consumption, Markets and Culture. 5(1), 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kupers, W. (2008). Embodied “inter-learning”: An integral phenomenology of learning in and by organizations, The Learning Organization. 15(5), 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Langeveld, M.J. (1983a). The stillness of the secret place. Phenomenology and Pedagogy 1(1), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Langeveld, M.J. (1983b). The secret place in the life of the child. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 1(2), 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & McLean, G. (2002). The meaning of Korean women’s experience of reentering the workforce. In T. M. Egan & S. A. Lynham ( Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference ( pp. 33–40). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development.
   Google Scholar
• LeVasseur, J. J. (2003). The problem of bracketing in phenomenology. Qualitative Health Research, 13(3), 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linschoten, J. (1987). On falling asleep. In J. J. Kockelmans ( Ed.), Phenomenological psychology: The Dutch school ( pp. 79–118). Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., & Church, A. H. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive. 16(1), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Trans. C. Smith. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Eye and mind. In J. M. Edie ( Ed.), The primacy of perception ( pp. 159–190). Trans. C. Dallery. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morenu, V., Jr. (2001). The rupture and restructuring of professional self-identity: A phenomenological study of BPR experiences. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(06), 2170A.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. (2003). Making sense of executive sensemaking: A phenomenological case study with methodological critism. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(4), 240–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling ( Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology ( pp. 41–60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, J. (2004). Layers of meaning: A coaching journey. In C. Huffington, D. Armstrong, W. Halton, L. Hoyle, & J. Pooley ( Eds.), Working below the surface: The emotional life of contemporary organizations ( pp. 171–190). London, UK: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (1993). Sexing the self: Gendered positions in cultural studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramis, H. (1993). Groundhog day. Culver City, CA: Columbia Pictures.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, T. (2007). Strengths finders 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., & Ryave, A. (2002). Systematic self-observation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R., & Roethlisberger, F. J. (1991, November–December). Barriers and gateways to communication. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 105–111.,
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2006). Auto/biography and auto/ethnography: Praxis of research method. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, P. (1982). Phenomenology: A new way of viewing organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 353–360.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, F. (1999). Phenomenology and the reflective practitioner. Management Learning, 30(4), 473–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist (55), 5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M E. P., Steen, T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherlock, J. (2002). Learning at the top: An investigation of nonprofit CEO’s learning experiences. In T. M. Egan & S. A. Lynham ( Eds.) Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference ( pp. 632–639). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P., & French, R. (2006). Negative capability and the capacity to think in the present moment: Some implications for leadership practice. Leadership, 2(2), 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. W. (2009). Phenomenology. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer edition). Ed. E. N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/phenomenology
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg, H. (1975). Doing phenomenology. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Srikantia, P. & Pasmore, W. (1996). Conviction and doubt in organizational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbruner, J. D. (1974). The cybernetic theory of decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, J. H. (1966). The psychology of the sickbed. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, J. H. (1972). A different existence: Principles of phenomenological psychopathology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zalm, J. E., & Bergum, V. (2000), Hermeneutic-phenomenology: Providing living knowledge for nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario Canada: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tiem, D. (1998). A phenomenological study of the strengths, weaknesses, limitations and future trends of training and performance technology. In R. J. Torraco ( Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference ( pp. 648–655). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. M., Mohr, B., & Kelly, R. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review 14, 516–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J. (2005). Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar