Business Student Perceptions of Online Learning: Using Focus Groups for Richer Understanding of Student Perspectives

References

• Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174. doi:10.2307/249763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2014, July 7). E-learning reaches a milestone. Chief Learning Officer. Retrieved from http://www.clomedia.com/2014/07/07/e-learning-reaches-a-milestone/
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, B. (2010). Online and blended business education for the 21st century: Current research and future directions. Cambridge, UK: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction in Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32–54. doi:10.1177/105256290002400104
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. (2010). Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1234–1244. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J., Dearmond, S., & Rau, B. (2013). New uses for existing tools? A call to study on-line management instruction and instructors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(4), 635–655. doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0018A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 169–182. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Do undergraduates and MBAs differ online?: Initial conclusions from the literature. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(2), 129–142. doi:10.1177/1548051810364989
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2013). Does academic discipline moderate CoI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16–28. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggaley, J. (2014). Online learning: A new testament. Distance Education, 35(1), 133–140. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.889589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, K., & Savage, S. (2013). The chalkboard versus the avatar: Comparing the effectiveness of online and in-class courses. Teaching Sociology, 41(3), 294–306. doi:10.1177/0092055X13479949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, H. H. (2003). On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an on-line learning community. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 22–36. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2003.9324013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M., & Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students’ academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. Internet and Higher Education, 21, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, E-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLange, P., Suwardy, T., & Mavondo, F. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: Determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1080/0963928032000064567
   Google Scholar
• Docebo. (2014). E-learning market trends & forecast 2014–2016 report. Retrieved from https://www.docebo.com/landing/contactform/elearning-market-trends-and-forecast-2014-2016-docebo-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, A., Bennett, D., & Greasley, K. (2004). A virtual learning environment for operations management: Assessing the student’s perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(9/10), 974–993. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 18, 315–325. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, H., & Karau, S. (2013). The importance of personality in students’ perceptions of the online learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2494–2500. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, D. L., & Smith, M. A. (2009). Student-to-student interaction revisited: A case study of working adult business students in online courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(2), 433–456. doi:10.1111/dsji.2009.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2008). Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 341–353. doi:10.1080/02602930701563070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. J., & Dolph, D. (2015). Student motives for taking online courses in educational administration. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(1), 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1993). The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms. Information Systems Research, 4, 24–54. doi:10.1287/isre.4.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, N., & Fry, N. (2006). Accounting students’ perceptions of a virtual learning environments: Springboard or safety net. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 15(2), 151–166. doi:10.1080/06939280600609201
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 531–563. doi:10.1177/1052562904271199
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 707–754. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moessenlechner, C., Obexer, R., Sixl-Daniell, K., & Seeler, J.-M. (2015). E-learning degree programs: A better way to balance work and education. International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, New York, NY. doi:10.3991/ijac.v8i3.4844
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nemanich, L., Banks, M., & Vera, D. (2009). Enhancing knowledge transfer in classroom versus online settings: The interplay among instructor, student, content, and context. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 123–148. doi:10.1111/dsji.2009.7.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Northrup, P. T. (2002). Online learners’ preferences for interaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Peltier, J., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing, 25, 260–276.
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426. doi:10.2307/3250989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Agenda. (2013). Not yet sold: What employers and community college students think about online education. Retrieved from http://www.publicagenda.org/files/NotYetSold_PublicAgenda_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redpath, L. (2012). Confronting the bias against on-line learning in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 125–140. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2012). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 81–88. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. A., Duray, R., & Reddy, V. (2006). Teamwork orientation, group cohesiveness, and student learning: A study of the use of teams in online distance education. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 592–616. doi:10.1177/1052562905276740
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 683–699. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.563279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students’ perspectives. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., Klemz, B., & Murphy, J. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 130–142. doi:10.1177/0273475303254004
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar