Mind Mapping: An Experiential Approach to Syllabus Review

References

• Becker, A. H., & Calhoon, S. K. (1999). What introductory psychology students attend to on a course syllabus. Teaching of Psychology, 26(1), 6–11. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2601_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. doi:10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbaugh, B., Seibel, S., & Archibald, T. (2017). Using a participatory approach to investigate a leadership program's theory of change. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(1), 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential. New York: Penguin Books USA Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Leyland, A., & Popham, F. (2017). Natural experiments: An overview of methods, approaches, and contributions to public health intervention research. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 39–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhindsa, H. S., Makarimi-Kasim, & Anderson, O. R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 186–200. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, R. A., & Lammi, M. (2014). Cognitive mapping techniques: Implications for research in engineering and technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 25(2), 2–17. doi:10.21061/jte.v25i2.a.1
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle, P. E., & Siudzinski, R. A. (2010). Recommended syllabus components: What do higher education faculty include in their syllabi? Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 21(3), 29–61.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., & Cooper, N. (2010). Mind mapping as a teaching resource. Clinical Teacher, 7(4), 236–239. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00395.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson, L. T., & Hauer, A. M. (2004). Mind map marketing: A creative approach in developing marketing skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 174–187. doi:10.1177/0273475304265634
   Google Scholar
• Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the `mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flammer, C., & Kacperczyk, A. (2016). The impact of stakeholder orientation on innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Science, 62(7), 1982–2001. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2011). Field experiments and natural experiments. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 1–28). Oxford, UK: Oxford Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Glascoff, D. W. (1984). The syllabus quiz: A multipurpose strategy. Journal of Marketing Education, 6(3), 46–49. doi:10.1177/027347538400600310
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M. E. (1990). A quasi-experiment assessing the effectiveness of TV advertising directed to children. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), 445–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X. (2014). Incorporating mind maps into teaching and learning in higher education: My experience as an international university lecturer. Accounting Education, 23(3), 258–261. doi:10.1080/09639284.2014.894772
   Google Scholar
• James, S. (2011). Does business school research have to be “excellent” to benefit business school teaching? International Journal of Management Education, 9(2), 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, K. D. (2015). A legal analysis and contrarian view of the syllabus-as-contract perspective. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 26(2), 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Matejka, K., & Kurke, L. B. (1994). Designing a great syllabus. College Teaching, 42(3), 115–117. doi:10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838
   Google Scholar
• Mento, A. J., Martinelli, P., & Jones, R. M. (1999). Mind mapping in executive education: Applications and outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 18(4), 390–416. doi:10.1108/02621719910265577
   Google Scholar
• Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2016). Empirical study: Mind mapping as a meta-learning strategy: Stimulating pre-adolescents’ text-learning strategies and performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 128–147. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M. (2015). University students’ understanding of the concepts empirical, theoretical, qualitative and quantitative research. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(7), 684–698. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1072152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymark, P. H., & Connor-Greene, P. A. (2002). The syllabus quiz. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 286–288. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2904_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosciano, A. (2015). The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching & Learning in Nursing, 10(2), 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. F., & Razzouk, N. Y. (1993). Improving classroom communication: The case of the course syllabus. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 215–221. doi:10.1080/08832323.1993.10117616
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. M., Armstrong, G. R., & Massad, V. J. (2010). Profiling a mind map user: A descriptive appraisal. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., Copeland-Solas, E., & Guthrie-Dixon, N. (2016). A preliminary study on the use of mind mapping as a visual-learning strategy in general education science classes for Arabic speakers in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 31–52. doi:10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19181
   Google Scholar
• Younge, K. A., Tong, T. W., & Fleming, L. (2015). How anticipated employee mobility affects acquisition likelihood: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5), 686–708. doi:10.1002/smj.2015.36.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar