Documenting Georeferenced Social Science Survey Data: Limits of Metadata Standards and Possible Solutions

References

• AdV and KLA. 2015. “Leitlinien Zur Bundesweit Einheitlichen Archivierung von Geobasisdaten. Abschlussbericht Der Gemeinsamen AdV-KLA-Arbeitsgruppe ‘Archivierung von Geobasisdaten’ 2014-2015. Hamburg. http://www.bundesarchiv.de/DE/Content/Downloads/KLA/leitlinien-geobasisdaten.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ahonen-Rainio, Paula. 2006. Metadata for geographic information. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 2 (1):37–66. doi: 10.1300/J230v02n01_03.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, James W. 2002. Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces 81 (1):117–52. doi: 10.1353/sof.2002.0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Allshouse, William B., Molly K. Fitch, Kristen H. Hampton, Dionne C. Gesink, Irene A. Doherty, Peter A. Leone, Marc L. Serre, and William C. Miller. 2010. Geomasking sensitive health data and privacy protection: An evaluation using an E911 database. Geocarto International 25 (6):443–52. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2010.496496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Marc P., and Amy J. Ruggles. 2005. Geographic information technologies and personal privacy. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 40 (4):63–73. doi: 10.3138/RU65-81R3-0W75-8V21.
   Google Scholar
• Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bluemke, Matthias, Bernd Resch, Clemens Lechner, René Westerholt, and Jan-Philipp Kolb. 2017. Integrating geographic information into survey research: Current applications, challenges and future avenues. Survey Research Methods 11 (3):307–27. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i3.6733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1958. Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1):3–7. doi: 10.2307/1388607.
   Google Scholar
• Bocquier, Aurélie, Sébastien Cortaredona, Céline Boutin, Aude David, Alexis Bigot, Basile Chaix, Jean Gaudart, and Pierre Verger. 2014. Is exposure to night-time traffic noise a risk factor for purchase of anxiolytic-hypnotic medication? A cohort study. European Journal of Public Health 24 (2):298–303. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boes, Stefan, Stephan Nüesch, and Steven Stillman. 2013. Aircraft noise, health, and residential sorting: Evidence from two quasi-experiments: Aircraft noise and health. Health Economics 22 (9):1037–51. doi: 10.1002/hec.2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, Kyle, and Scott J. South. 2011. Spatial and temporal dimensions of neighborhood effects on high school graduation. Social Science Research 40 (1):87–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DataCite. 2017. DataCite Metadata Scheme 4.1. Accessed February 15, 2019 https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, Verena, and Uwe Jirjahn. 2014. Ethnic residential segregation and immigrants’ perceptions of discrimination in West Germany. Urban Studies 51 (16):3330–47. doi: 10.1177/0042098014522719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, Liam, Kyle Crowder, and Robert J. Kemp. 2016. Family structure, residential mobility, and environmental inequality: Family structure and environmental inequality. Journal of Marriage and Family 79 (2):535–55. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, George T., Sallie A. Keller-McNulty, and S. Lynne Stokes. 2003. Disclosure risk vs. data utility: The R-U confidentiality map. CHANCE 17 (3):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul N., Matthew S. Mayernik, Archer L. Batcheller, Geoffrey C. Bowker, and Christine L. Borgman. 2011. Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science 41 (5):667–90. doi: 10.1177/0306312711413314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament and European Council. 2002. “Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council.” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002L0049.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and European Council. 2008. REGULATION (EC) No 763/2008 on Population and Housing Censuses.
   Google Scholar
• Förster, André. 2018. Ethnic heterogeneity and electoral turnout: Evidence from linking neighbourhood data with individual voter data. Electoral Studies 53 (June):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• German Environmental Agency/EIONET Central Data Repository. 2016. “Road Traffic Noise 2012 Shapefiles.” Accessed November 30, 2016, https://github.com/stefmue/georefum/blob/master/data/cdr.road.lden.dat.rda.
   Google Scholar
• GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. 2015. “ALLBUS/GGSS 2014 (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage Der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey 2014). GESIS Data Archive. http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.12209.
   Google Scholar
• GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. 2018. “ALLBUS/GGSS (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey) - Sensitive Regional Data.” GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13010.
   Google Scholar
• GESIS-Data Archive For The Social Sciences. 2018. “Downloadstatistik GESIS Datenarchiv.” GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12979.
   Google Scholar
• Goebel. 2017, Jan. SOEP 2015-Informationen Zu Den SOEP-Geocodes in SOEP V32. SOEP Survey Papers 407. DIW.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Nancy-Diana, Eva Méndez, and Tony Hernández-Pérez. 2016. Data and metadata research in the social sciences and humanities: An approach from data repositories in these disciplines. El Profesional de La Información 25 (4):545. doi: 10.3145/epi.2016.jul.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Ann, and Chuck Humphrey. 2013. Building the DDI. IASSIST Quarterly 37 (1–4):36–44. doi: 10.29173/iq500.
   Google Scholar
• Hillmert, Steffen, Andreas Hartung, and Katarina Weßling. 2017. Dealing with space and place in standard survey data. Survey Research Methods, Vol 11, No 3 (2017): Special Issue: Uses of Geographic Information Systems Tools in Survey Data Collection and Analysis, October. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i3.6729.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, Larry, Fortunato Castillo, Benjamin Clark, Neeraj Kumar Kashyap, Denise Perpich, Joachim Wackerow, and Knut Wenzig. 2011. Metadata for the longitudinal data life cycle: The role and benefit of metadata management and reuse. DDI Alliance Working Papers Series doi: 10.3886/DDILongitudinal03.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Uwe, Alexia Katsanidou, and Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen. 2011. Metadaten und Standards. In Handbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, eds. Stephan Büttner, Hans-Christoph Hobohm, and Lars Müller. Bad Honnef: Bock + Herchen Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Uwe, Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen, and Catharina Wasner. 2019. Metadatenstandards Im Kontext Sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten. In Forschungsdatenmanagement Sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten. Grundlagen Und Praktische Lösungen Für Den Umgang Mit Quantitativen Forschungsdaten, eds. Uwe Jensen, Sebastian Netscher, and K atrin Weller, 151–78. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Jünger, Stefan. 2019. Using georeferenced data in social science survey research: The method of spatial linking and its application with the German General Social Survey and the GESIS Panel (GESIS Series, 24). Cologne: GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63688-7
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, Julia, Stefan Müller, and Merlin Schaeffer. 2017. Der Halo-Effekt in Einheimisch-Homogenen Nachbarschaften: Steigert Die Ethnische Diversität Angrenzender Nachbarschaften Die Xenophobie? Zeitschrift Für Soziologie 46 (6):402–19. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1022.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Nicole Ningning. 2015. Exploring best management practices for geospatial data in academic libraries. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 11 (2):207–25. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2015.1043170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legewie, Joscha, and Merlin Schaeffer. 2016. Contested boundaries: Explaining where ethnoracial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. American Journal of Sociology 122 (1):125–61. doi: 10.1086/686942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martig, Noemi, and Julian Bernauer. 2016. Der Halo-Effekt: Diffuses Bedrohungsempfinden Und SVP-Wähleranteil. Swiss Political Science Review 22 (3):385–408. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12217.
   Google Scholar
• Matloff, Norman, and Patrick Tendick. 2015. A new method for avoiding data disclosure while automatically preserving multivariate relations. arXiv:1510.04406.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Reto, and Heidi Bruderer Enzler. 2013. Geographic Information System (GIS) and its application in the social sciences using the example of the Swiss environmental survey. MDA 7 317–346. doi: 10.12758/mda.2013.016.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefan, Stefan Schweers, and Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen. 2015. Georeferenced survey data at the GESIS data archive. Presented at the EDDI15 – 7th annual European DDI user conference, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefan, Stefan Schweers, and Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen. 2016. The past, present and future of geocoded survey data at the GESIS data archive. Presented at the EDDI16 – 8th annual European DDI user conference, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefan. 2019. Räumliche Verknüpfung Georeferenzierter Umfragedaten Mit Geodaten: Chancen, Herausforderungen Und Praktische Empfehlungen. In Forschungsdatenmanagement Sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten. Grundlagen Und Praktische Lösungen Für Den Umgang Mit Quantitativen Forschungsdaten, eds. Uwe Jensen, Sebastian Netscher, and Katrin Weller, 211–29. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Stefan, Stefan Schweers, and Pascal Siegers. 2017. Geocoding and spatial linking of survey data – An introduction for social scientists. GESIS Paper 15:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnenmacher, Alexandra, and Juergen Friedrichs. 2011. The missing link: Deficits of country-level studies. A review of 22 articles explaining life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research 110 (February):1221–44. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9981-8.
   Google Scholar
• Oiamo, Tor H., Jamie Baxter, Alice Grgicak-Mannion, Xiaohong Xu, and Isaac N. Luginaah. 2015. Place effects on noise annoyance: cumulative exposures, odour annoyance and noise sensitivity as mediators of environmental context. Atmospheric Environment 116 (September):183–93. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.024.
   Google Scholar
• OpenStreetMap Contributors. 2017. Planet dump. https://Planet.Osm.Org.
   Google Scholar
• Porcal-Gonzalo, Maria C. 2015. A strategy for the management, preservation, and reutilization of geographical information based on the lifecycle of geospatial data: An assessment and a proposal based on experiences from Spain and Europe. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 11 (3):289–329. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2015.1064054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Karsten Boye. 2014. Social Science Metadata and the Foundations of the DDI. IASSIST Quarterly 37 (1):28. doi: 10.29173/iq499.
   Google Scholar
• Rüttenauer, Tobias. 2018. Neighbours matter: A nation-wide small-area assessment of environmental inequality in Germany. Social Science Research 70 (February):198–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.11.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens, and Patrick Ruth. 2013. Contextual explanations of radical right-wing support in Sweden: Socioeconomic marginalization, group threat, and the halo effect. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (4):711–28. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.623786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saib, Mahdi-Salim, Julien Caudeville, Florence Carre, Olivier Ganry, Alain Trugeon, and Andre Cicolella. 2014. Spatial relationship quantification between environmental, socioeconomic and health data at different geographic levels. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11 (4):3765–86. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110403765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweers, Stefan, Katharina, Kinder-Kurlanda, Stefan Müller, and Pascal Siegers. 2016. Conceptualizing a spatial data infrastructure for the social sciences: An example from Germany. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 12 (1):100–26. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2015.1100152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Chris. 2012. Statistical disclosure risk: Separating potential and harm: Statistical Disclosure Risk. International Statistical Review 80 (3):349–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00194.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluiter, Roderick, Jochem Tolsma, and Peer Scheepers. 2015. At which geographic scale does ethnic diversity affect intra-neighborhood social capital? Social Science Research 54 (November):80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stansfeld, S. A., and M. Shipley. 2015. Noise sensitivity and future risk of illness and mortality. Science of the Total Environment 520 (July):114–9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.053.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statistical Offices of the Federation and the Länder. 2018. “Immigrant Rates. German Census 2011.” https://github.com/stefmue/georefum/blob/master/data/census.attr.rda.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, R. 2014. A spatially integrated approach to social science research. In Handbook of research methods and applications in spatially integrated social science, edited by R. Stimson, 13–25. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Termorshuizen, Fabian, Arjan W. Braam, and Erik J. C. van Ameijden. 2015. Neighborhood ethnic density and suicide risk among different migrant groups in the four big cities in the Netherlands. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 50 (6):951–62. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0993-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolsma, J., and T. W. G. van der Meer. 2017. Losing wallets, retaining trust? The relationship between ethnic heterogeneity and trusting coethnic and non-coethnic neighbours and non-neighbours to return a lost wallet. Social Indicators Research 131 (2):631–58. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1264-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Eynden, Veerle, and Louise Corti. 2017. Advancing research data publishing practices for the social sciences: From archive activity to empowering researchers. International Journal on Digital Libraries 18 (2):113–21. doi: 10.1007/s00799-016-0177-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardigan, Mary. 2013. The DDI Matures: 1997 to the Present. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Vardigan, Mary, Pascal Heus, and Wendy Thomas. 2008. Data documentation initiative: Toward a standard for the social sciences. International Journal of Digital Curation 3 (1):107–13. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.45.
   Google Scholar
• Weßling, Katarina Dorothee. 2016. The influence of socio-spatial contexts on transitions from school to vocational and academic training in Germany. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 7 (12). https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-15222
   Google Scholar
• Zandbergen, Paul A. 2014. Ensuring confidentiality of geocoded health data: Assessing geographic masking strategies for individual-level data. Advances in Medicine 2014:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2014/567049.
   Google Scholar
• Zenk-Möltgen, Wolfgang. 2012. Metadaten und die Data Documentation Initiative (DDI). In Langzeitarchivierung von Forschungsdaten: Standards und disziplinspezifische Lösungen, eds. Reinhard Altenhöner and Claudia Oellers, 111–26. Berlin: Scivero Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zwickl, Klara, Michael Ash, and James K. Boyce. 2014. Regional variation in environmental inequality: Industrial air toxics exposure in U.S. cities. Ecological Economics 107 (November):494–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.013.
   Google Scholar