Comparable and Yet Context-Sensitive? Improving Evaluation in Violently Divided Societies Through Methodology

References

• Anderson , M.B. , Chigas , D. , Olson , L. and Woodrow , P. 2004 . Reflecting on Peace Practice Handbook , Cambridge, MA : Collaborative for Development Action. . www.cdainc.com/rpp/docs/ReflectingOnPeacePracticeHandbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell , S. 2000 . Logical Frameworks, Aristotle and Soft Systems: A Note on the Origins, Values and Uses of Logical Frameworks, in Reply to Gasper . Public Administration and Development , 20 ( 1 ) : 29 – 31 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum , A. 2011 . Improving Peacebuilding Evaluation: A Whole-of-Field Approach , Washington : USIP .
   Google Scholar
• Brounéus , K. 2008 . Analyzing Reconciliation: A Structured Method for Measuring National Reconciliation Initiatives . Journal of Peace Psychology , 14 ( 3 ) : 291 – 313 .
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, A. & Ali, S.H. 2010, ‘Developing a Reconciliation Indicator’, 19 January: http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/innovations/data/000154
   Google Scholar
• Denskus , T. 2012 . Challenging the International Peacebuilding Evaluation Discourse with Qualitative Methodologies . Evaluation and Program Planning , 35 : 148 – 153 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of State. 2011 . Conflict Mitigation and Reconciliation [indicators] , Washington : United States Department of State. . http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/101762.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of State. 2012 . Program Evaluation , Washington : United States Department of State. . http://www.state.gov/s/d/rm/rls/perfrpt/2010/html/153549.htm
   Google Scholar
• Department of State & USAID 2010, ‘Leading through Civilian Power: The First Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Report’, Washington: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/153635.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DFID 2010, ‘Briefing Paper 1: Monitoring and Evaluation, Working Effectively in Conflict-Affected and Fragile Situations’, London: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Documents/publications1/governance/building-peaceful-states-I.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diehl , P.F. and Druckman , D. 2010 . Evaluating Peace Operations , Boulder, CO : Lynne Rienner .
   Google Scholar
• Dziedzic , M. , Sotirin , B. and Agoglia , J. 2008 . “ Measuring Progress in Conflict Environment (MPICE): A Metrics Framework for Assessing Conflict Transformation and Stabilization ” . United States Institute of Peace . Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Easterly , W. and Williamson , C.R. 2011 . Rhetoric Versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices . World Development , 39 ( 11 ) : 1930 – 1949 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galama , A. and van Tongeren , P. 2002 . “ Towards Better Peace Building Practice ” . In Towards Better Peacebuilding Practice: On Lessons Learned, Evaluation Practices and Aid & Conflict , Edited by: Galama , A. and van Tongeren , P. 13 – 41 . Utrecht : European Centre for Conflict Prevention .
   Google Scholar
• Gasper , D. 2000 . Evaluating the “Logical Framework Approach” towards Learning-Oriented Development Evaluation . Public Administration and Development , 20 ( 1 ) : 17 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George , A.L. and Bennett , A. 2004 . Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, BCSIA Studies in International Security , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gibson , J.L. 2006 . Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science January , 603 ( 1 ) : 82 – 110 .
   Google Scholar
• Gibson , J.L. 2007 . “Truth” and “Reconciliation” as Social Indicators . Social Indicators Research , 81 ( 2 ) : 257 – 281 .
   Google Scholar
• Grofman , B. 1997 . “ Seven Durable Axes of Cleavage in Political Science ” . In Contemporary Empirical Political Theory , Edited by: Monroe , K.R. 75 – 86 . Berkeley, CA : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hamber , B. and Kelly , G. 2008 . “ The Challenge of Reconciliation: Translating Theory into Practice ” . In Northern Ireland Community Relations Council, A Sustainable Peace? Research as a Contribution to Peace Building in Northern Ireland 3 – 26 . Belfast
   Google Scholar
• Hermann , T. 2004 . “ Reconciliation: Reflections on the Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Term ” . In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation , Edited by: Bar-Siman-Tov , Y. 39 – 60 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• ISA 2013, ‘Engaging with the New Deal: Amplifying Voices from Fragile and Conflict Affected Countries’, Peace Studies Roundtable, International Studies Association Annual Convention, San Francisco, 3 April
   Google Scholar
• Kelman , H.C. 2004 . “ Reconciliation as Identity Change: A Social-Psychological Perspective ” . In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation , Edited by: Bar-Siman-Tov , Y. 111 – 124 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kelman , H.C. 2008 . Evaluating the Contributions of Interactive Problem Solving to the Resolution of Ethnonational Conflicts . Peace and Conflict , 14 ( 1 ) : 29 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Leach , W.D. and Sabatier , P.A. 2005 . To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking . American Political Science Review , 99 ( 4 ) : 491 – 503 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederach , J.P. 1997 . Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies , Washington : United States Institute of Peace .
   Google Scholar
• Lederach , J.P. , Neufeldt , R. and Culbertson , H. 2007 . Reflective Peacebuilding: A Planning, Monitoring, and Learning Toolkit , Notre Dame, IN : Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Leonhardt , M. 2003 . “ Towards a Unified Methodology: Reframing PCIA ” . In Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment: Critical Views on Theory and Practice Edited by: Austin , A. , Fischer , M. and Wils , O. 53 – 66 . http://www.berghof-handbook.net/documents/publications/dialogue1_leonhardt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty , R. 2013 . Indicators +: A Proposal for Everyday Peace Indicators . Evaluation and Program Planning , 36 ( 1 ) : 56 – 63 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, I.S. 2008, ‘Measuring Reconciliation When There Is No Roadmap: A Study of Trajectory’, paper presented at International Peace Research Association Conference, Institute for International and European Policy, Leuven, Belgium, 15–19 July
   Google Scholar
• Meierhenrich , J. 2008 . Varieties of Reconciliation . Law & Social Inquiry , 33 ( 1 ) : 195 – 231 .
   Google Scholar
• Mika , H. 2002 . Evaluation as Peacebuilding?: Transformative Values, Processes, and Outcomes . Contemporary Justice Review , 5 ( 4 ) : 339 – 349 .
   Google Scholar
• Neufeldt , R.C. 2011 . “Frameworkers” and “circlers” — Exploring Assumptions in Impact Assessment ” . In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II , Edited by: Austin , B. , Fischer , M. and Giessmann , H.J. 483 – 504 . Opladen, Germany : Barbara Budrich .
   Google Scholar
• OECD . 2007 . Encouraging Effective Evaluation of Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities . OECD Journal on Development , 8 ( 3 ) : 7 – 106 .
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2008, ‘Guidance on Evaluating Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities: Working Draft for Application Period’, Paris
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2012, Evaluating Peacebuilding Activities in Settings of Conflict and Fragility: Improving Learning for Results, Paris
   Google Scholar
• Peacebuilding Centre 2011, Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment (PCIA) Handbook, version 3.3, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Scharbatke-Church , C. 2011 . “ Evaluating Peacebuilding: Not Yet All It Could Be ” . In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II , Edited by: Austin , B. , Fischer , M. and Giessmann , H.J. 460 – 482 . Opladen, Germany : Barbara Budrich .
   Google Scholar
• Shaw , R. 2005 . Rethinking Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: Lessons from Sierra Leone , Washington : United States Institute of Peace .
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2004, ‘Towards a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding — Getting Their Act Together: Overview of the Joint Utstein Study of Peacebuilding’, report commissioned by Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, April
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.W. 2010, ‘From Truth to Justice: How Does Amnesty Factor in? A Comparative Analysis of South Africa and Sierra Leone's Truth and Reconciliation Commissions’, honors scholar thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs
   Google Scholar
• Stover , H. and Weinstein , H.M. 2004 . “ Conclusions: A Common Objective, a Universe of Alternatives ” . In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity , Edited by: Stover , E. and Weinstein , H.M. 323 – 342 . Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tiemessen, A. 2008, ‘Transitional Justice as a Normative Structure: What to Expect When You're Expecting Accountability’, paper presented at Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 4–6 June
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2010, ‘Monitoring Peace Consolidation: United Nations Practitioners' Guide to Benchmarking’, New York: http://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pbso/pdf/monitoring_peace_consolidation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2011, ‘Strategic Results Framework on Women, Peace and Security: 2011–2020’, New York, July: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/ianwge/taskforces/wps/Strategic_Framework_2011-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USAID. 2010, Office of Inspector General: Audit of USAID/East Africa's Conflict Mitigation Activities, Washington
   Google Scholar
• USAID. 2011a, ‘Foreign Operations: FY 2011 Performance Report, FY 2013 Performance plan’, Washington: http://www.usaid.gov/performance/apr/APR2011-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USAID. 2011b, Mid-Term Evaluation of USAID's Counter-Extremism Programming in Africa, Washington
   Google Scholar
• USAID. 2011c, ‘Food for Peace Standard Indicators Handbook’, Washington, December: http://transition.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/ffpstdindicatorhb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera , S. 2003 . “ Why States Believe Foolish Ideas: Nonself-Evaluation by States and Societies ” . In Perspectives on Structural Realism , Edited by: Hanami , A.K. 163 – 198 . New York : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Villa-Vicencio , C. 2009 . Walk with Us and Listen: Political Reconciliation in Africa , Washington : Georgetown University Press .
   Google Scholar