Pcia Theory in Field Practice: World Vision's Pursuit of Peace Impact and Programming Quality Across Sectors

REFERENCES

• Africa Peace Forum et al. 2004, Conflict-Sensitive Approaches to Development, Humanitarian Assistance and Peace Building: Tools for Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment. Available from http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/publications/conflict-sensitive-approaches-development-humanitarian-assistance-and-peacebuilding-res.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B.M.1999, Do No Harm, How Aid Can Support Peace — or War, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B.M.2000 ed., Options For Aid in Conflict. Lessons from Field Experience, Cambridge, MA: CDA Collaborative Learning Projects.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folke, C.2003, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K.1990, The Three Faces of Power, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, K.1998, ‘A Measure of Peace: Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment (PCIA) of Development Projects in Conflict Zones’, Working Paper No. 1, Peacebuilding and Reconstruction Program Initiative & Evaluation Unit, IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, K.2003, Hands-On PCIA, Part 1, A Handbook for Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment (PCIA), Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, R. & Benne, K.1969, ‘General Strategies for Effecting Changes in Human Systems’ in Bennis, W.G., Benne, K.D. & Chin, R. eds, The Planning of Change, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston: 32–59.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, R. & Benne, K.2005, ‘General Strategies for Effecting Changes in Human Systems’ in Conflict, Power and Change, Birmingham: Responding to Conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalisation_(sociology), accessed 1 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.2009, ‘Four Priorities for WV Programming in Fragile Contexts, Good Governance, Economic Development, Civic Participation, and Peace and Reconciliation’, internal review of 25 ‘Making Sense of Turbulent Contexts’ workshops in 17 countries, WV International.
   Google Scholar
• Garred, M.2007, ‘Conflict-Sensitivity in Emergencies, Learning from the Asia Tsunami Response’, WV: www.wvasiapacific.org.
   Google Scholar
• Garred, M. & Abu-Nimer, M.2006 eds, A Shared Future: Local Capacities for Peace in Community Development, Monrovia, CA: WV International.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L.H. & Holling, C.S.2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, H.2009, ‘Community-based Approaches to Peacebuilding in Conflict-Affected and Fragile Contexts’, Issue Paper, International Development Department, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, D.2009, ‘Complexity Theory and Conflict Transformation: An Exploration of Potential and Implications’, Working Paper 17, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S.2004, ‘From Complex Regions to Complex Worlds’ in Ecology and Society9: 1. Available from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/, accessed 8 June 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S.2005, ‘From Complex Regions to Complex Worlds’, http://mjlst.umn.edu/prod/groups/ahc/@pub/@ahc/…/ahc_asset_365941.pdf, accessed 28 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, M.2000, Conflict Impact Assessment of EU Development Co-operation with ACP Countries, A Review of Literature and Practice, International Alert and Saferworld.
   Google Scholar
• Loode, S.2011, ‘Peacebuilding in Complex Social Systems, Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development’ in Journal of Peace, Conflict & Development18: 68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Nepal, R.T.2007, ‘Effective Ways of Influencing to Integrate Peacebuilding Components in a Development Project’, MA action research report, Paññãsãstra University of Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• NPI Africa & NCCK 2002. ‘Strategic and Responsive Evaluation of Peacebuilding, Towards a Learning Model’, report of 2nd Action–Reflection Seminar convened by NPI Africa and NCCK-CPBD Project.
   Google Scholar
• OECD DAC 2008. ‘Evaluating Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities’, Fact Sheet: www.oecd.org/dac/conflict, accessed 1 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pojasek, B.R.2005, ‘Improving Processes: The Traditional Approach versus the Systems Approach’ in Environmental Quality Management15: 1: 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, E.R. & Sonenshein, S.2007, ‘Four General Strategies for Changing Human Systems’, http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/17525_chapter_5.pdf cite, accessed 8 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., Chassy, A. & Bamat, T.2010, Integrating Peacebuilding into Humanitarian and Development Programming, Practical Guidance on Designing Effective, Holistic Peacebuilding Projects, Catholic Relief Services, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D.2004, Towards a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding: Getting Their Act Together, Overview of the Joint Utstein Study of Peacebuilding, Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• WV Canada 2007. Governance, Ecosystems and Livelihoods, Application of Complex Adaptive Systems to WV's Transformational Development Model October 1, 2007–September 31, 2010. A Three-year Program Implemented by WV Canada in Tanzania, Rwanda, Mauritania and DRC.
   Google Scholar
• WV International 2011. I-PACS Assessment Manual, Draft 2.3.
   Google Scholar
• WV Kenya 2009. Evaluation of the North Rift Food Security Recovery Project: Applying a Conflict-Sensitive and Peacebuilding Lens.
   Google Scholar
• WV Rwanda 2013. Integrating Peacebuilding and Conflict-Sensitivity in Programming, Training and Learning Forum Summary Report.
   Google Scholar
• WV South Sudan 2010. Conflict-Sensitivity Program Integration (C-SPIN) Project, End of Project Evaluation Report.
   Google Scholar
• WV Uganda 2008. Capacity Support for Peacebuilding Project, Local Capacities for Peace / Do No Harm (LCP/DNH) Lessons Learnt Report.
   Google Scholar