The Development of a Concept Map for Understanding Spiritual Integration in Evangelically Based Social Service Organizations

REFERENCES

• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: A guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bukiewicz, R. (2012, February 13). Intentional, appropriate, relevant: Relevant evangelism doesn’t mean compromising our message [Special section]. Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Retrieved from http://www.christianitytoday.com/le/channel/utilities/print.html?type=article&id=95198
   Google Scholar
• Cnaan, R. A., & Boddie, S. C. (2008). Setting the context: Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based social services. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3–4), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W. L. (2005). Embracing spirituality as an element of professional self care. Social Work & Christianity, 32, 263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Concept Systems, Inc. (2002). Health and aging. Ithaca, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Concept Systems, Inc. (2006). The concept system: Facilitator training seminar manual (4th ed.). Ithaca, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cornett, C. (1992). Toward a more comprehensive personology: Integrating a spiritual perspective into social work practice. Social Work, 37(2), 101–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, B. (2002). Duty to inform: Preparing social work students to understand vicarious traumatization. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22, 3–19. Retrieved from http://www.haworthpressinc.com/store/product.asp?sku=J067
   Google Scholar
• Dilulio, J. J. (2000). Godly people in the public square. The Public Interest, 141, 113–114.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, C. (2011). The complete proposal: Integrating IRB requirements into the research proposal development process. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas11/Article_79.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ebaugh, H. R., Chafetz, J. S., & Pipes, P. F. (2006). Where’s the faith in faith-based organizations? Measures and correlates of religiosity in faith-based social service coalitions. Social Forces, 84(4), 2259–2272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebaugh, H. R., Pipes, P. F., Chafetz, J. S., & Daniels, M. (2003). Where’s the religion? Distinguishing faith-based from secular social service agencies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43(3), 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fact sheet: Salvation army organization and structure. (2010). Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3CIs-F1kElgJ:www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn_2.nsf/0/D93486CB77A60B8D852577D00067ACE2/%24file/Fact_Sheet_-_Salvation_Army_Organization_and_Structure.doc+salvation+army+organizational+structure&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. M., Wu, Q., Spruijt-Metz, D., & Dyrness, G. (2007). Outcomes evaluation in faith-based social services: Are we evaluating faith accurately? Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 264–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R. L. (2004). The devil is in the details: Implementing secular outcome measurement methods in faith-based organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, N., & Rosas, S. (2010). Concept mapping of photovoices: Sequencing and integrating methods to understand immigrants’ perceptions of neighborhood influences on health. Family & Community Health, 33(3), 193–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatry, H., Van Houten, T., Plantz, M., & Greenway, M. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hazzard, J. (1998). Marching on the margins: An analysis of the Salvation Army in the United States. Review of Religious Research, 40(2), 121–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, D. (2000). Do faith-based providers respect client autonomy? A comparison of client and staff perceptions in faith-based and secular residential treatment programs. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 19(3), 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., & Trochim, W. M. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 307–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. R. (2002). Objective hope, assessing the effectiveness of faith-based organizations: A review of the literature [White paper]. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. B. (2007). The multiple sources of mission drift. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M., & Trochim, W. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. M., Baker, E. A., Brownson, R. C., & Schootman, M. (2007). Translating research into practice: Using concept mapping to determine locally relevant intervention strategies to increase physical activity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 282–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. S., & Bielefeld, W. (2002). Government shekels without government shackles? The administrative challenges of Charitable Choice. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. S., & Bielefeld, W. (2003). Charitable choice: First results from three states [White paper]. Indianopolis, IN: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. G., & Shepherd, D. M. (1997). Concept mapping organizational cultures. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(4), 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multdimensional scaling. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, number 07-011. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. M. (2008). Issues and dilemmas in faith-based social service delivery: The case of the Salvation Army of greater Philadelphia. Administration in Social Work, 27(3), 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, S. (2009). Reputation management in the Salvation Army: A narrative study. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. S., III. ( December 2005–January 2006). A hospitable Army. The Journal of Aggressive Christianity Online,40, 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Monette, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R. ( Eds). (2008). Applied social research: A Tool for human services. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Monsma, S. V., & Soper, J. C. (2003, September). What works: Comparing the effectiveness of welfare-to-work programs in Los Angeles. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C. D. (1999). Making room: Recovering hospitality as a Christian tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ragan, M. (2004). Faith-based vs. secular: Using administrative data to compare the performance of faith-affiliated and other service providers [Research report]. Retrieved from The Roundtable on Religion and Social Welfare Policy at http://www.religionandsocialpolicy.org/docs/research/Benchmarking_report_12-23-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rao, J. K., Alongi, J., Anderson, L. A., Jenkins, L., Stokes, G.A., & Kane, M. (2005). Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(5), 453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (1997). A spiritual strategy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, S. (2005). Concept mapping as a technique for program theory development: An illustration using family support programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2011). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 236–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sider, R. J., & Unruh, H. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 109–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Salvation Army. (1987). Order and regulations for officers of The Salvation Army (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). London, UK: Campfield Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Salvation Army. (1993). Good news: The official publication of The Salvation Army in the USA Eastern Territory. West Nyack, NY.
   Google Scholar
• The Salvation Army Northern Division. (2013). Salvation Army officers: All the things you never knew. Retrieved from http://salvationarmynorth.org/2013/02/salvation-army-officers-all-the-things-you-never-knew/
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. (2006). Faith-based programs and the role of empirical research. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3–4), 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. In W. Trochim ( Ed.), A Special Issue of Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderwoerd, J. R. (2004). How faith-based social service organizations manage secular pressures associated with government funding. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(3), 239–262.
   Google Scholar
• Winship, J. (2001). Faith in action: Guiding principles for community caring ministries. Des Plaines, IL: The Salvation Army.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group on Human Needs and Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. (2002). Finding common ground: 29 recommendations of the working group on human needs and faith-based and community initiatives. Washington, DC: Search for Common Ground.
   Google Scholar
• Yampolskaya, S., Nesman, T. M., Hernandez, M., & Koch, D. (2004). Using concept mapping to develop a logic model and articulate a program theory: A case example. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(2), 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanis, D. A., & Cnaan, R. A. (2006). Social service research and religion: Thoughts how to measure intervention-based impact. Journal of Spirituality & Religion in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3–4), 83–104.
   Google Scholar